Brains and bravery: Little evidence of a relationship between brain size and flightiness in shorebirds

Austral Ecology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 516-522

  Guay, P J ^a   Weston, M A ^b   Symonds, M R E ^b   Glover, H K ^b,c  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Pioneer Catchment and Landcare Group   (Australia)

Author keywords

Brain size; Flight initiation distance; Phylogenetic generalized least squares regression; Shorebird

Indexed keywords

AKAIKE INFORMATION CRITERION; AVIFAUNA; BODY MASS; BODY SIZE; BRAIN; COGNITION; FLIGHTLESSNESS; HABITUATION; PERCEPTION; PHYLOGENETICS; SURVIVAL; WADER;

AVES;

EID: 84879763478     PISSN: 14429985     EISSN: 14429993     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02441.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Antos M. J., Ehmke G. C., Tzaros C. L. & Weston M. A. (2007) Unauthorised human use of an urban coastal wetland sanctuary: current and future patterns. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80, 173-83.
2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2004) Measures of Australia's Progress. Australian Government, Canberra.
3. Bennett P. M. & Harvey P. M. (1987) Active and resting metabolism in birds: allometry, phylogeny and ecology. J. Zool. 213, 327-63.
4. Blomberg S. P., Garland T. & Ives A. R. (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717-45.
5. Blumstein D. T. (2003) Flight initiation distance in birds is dependant on intruder starting distance. J. Wildl. Manage. 67, 852-7.
6. Blumstein D. T. (2006) Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim. Behav. 71, 389-99.
7. Burger J. & Gochfeld M. (1991) Human distance and birds: tolerance and response distances of resident and migrant species in India. Environ. Conserv. 104, 388-94.
8. Burnham K. P. & Anderson D. R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New York.
9. Burton R. F. (2008) The scaling of eye size in adult birds: relationship to brain, head and body sizes. Vision Res. 48, 2345-51.
10. Christidis L. & Boles W. E. (2008) Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood.
11. Cooke A. S. (1980) Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an apporaching human in rural and suburban areas. Biol. Conserv. 18, 85-8.
12. Day L. B., Westcott D. A. & Olster D. H. (2005) Evolution of bower complexity and cerebellum size in bowerbirds. Brain Behav. Evol. 66, 62-72.
13. Felsenstein J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1-15.
14. Fernández-Juricic E., Jimenez M. D. & Lucas E. (2002) Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats. Can. J. Zool. 80, 1212-20.
15. Frid A. & Dill L. M. (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6, 11.
16. Garamszegi L. Z., Møller A. P. & Erritzoe J. (2002) Coevolving avian eye size and brain size in relation to prey capture and nocturnality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269, 961-7.
17. Geering A., Agnew L. & Harding S. (2007) Shorebirds in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
18. Glover H. K., Weston M. A., Maguire G. S., Miller K. K. & Christie B. A. (2011) Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc. Urban Plan. 103, 326-34.
19. Grant J. W. A. & Noakes D. L. G. (1987) Escape behaviour and use of cover by young-of-the-year brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 1390-6.
20. Guay P.-J. & Iwaniuk A. N. (2008a) Captive breeding reduces brain size in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Condor 110, 276-84.
21. Guay P.-J. & Iwaniuk A. N. (2008b) Interspecific variation in relative brain size is not correlated with intensity of sexual selection in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Aust. J. Zool. 56, 311-21.
22. Guay P.-J., Parrott M. & Selwood L. (2012) Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations. Zoo Biol. 31, 82-6.
23. Harvey P. H. & Krebs J. R. (1990) Comparing brains. Science 249, 140-6.
24. Healy S. D. & Rowe C. (2007) A critique of comparative studies of brain size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274, 453-64.
25. Hediger H. (1934) Zur Biologie und Psychologie der Flucht bei Tieren. Biol. Zent. Bl 54, 21-40.
26. Higgins P. J. & Davies S. J. J. F. (1996) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Volume 3: Snipe to Pigeons. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
27. Holmes T. L., Knight R. L., Stegall L. & Craig G. R. (1993) Responses of wintering grassland raptors to human disturbance. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 21, 461-8.
28. Iwaniuk A. N. (2003) The Evolution of Brain Size and Structure in Birds. Monash University, Clayton.
29. Iwaniuk A. N. & Nelson J. E. (2001) A comparative analysis of relative brain size in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Brain Behav. Evol. 57, 87-97.
30. Iwaniuk A. N. & Nelson J. E. (2002) Can endocranial volume be used as an estimate of brain size in birds? Can. J. Zool. 80, 16-23.
31. Iwaniuk A. N. & Nelson J. E. (2003) Developmental differences are correlated with relative brain size in birds: a comparative analysis. Can. J. Zool. 81, 1913-28.
32. Kear J. (2005) Ducks, Geese and Swans. Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Kitchen K., Lill A. & Price M. (2010) Tolerance of human disturbance by urban magpie-larks. Aust. Field Ornithol. 27, 1-9.
34. Lord A., Wass J. R., Innes J. & Whittingham M. J. (2001) Effects of human approaches to nests of northern New Zealand dotterel. Biol. Conserv. 98, 233-40.
35. Madden J. (2001) Sex, bowers and brains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 268, 833-8.
36. Marchant S. & Higgins P. J. (1993) Handbook of Australian, New Zealand & Antarctic Birds. Volume 2: Raptors to Lapwings. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
37. Martins E. P. (2004) COMPARE, version 4.6b. Computer programs for the statistical analysis of comparative data. Distributed by the author at http://compare.bio.indiana.edu/. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington IN.
38. Martins E. P. & Hansen T. F. (1997) Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149, 646-67.
39. Møller A. P. (2008) Flight distance and population trends in European breeding birds. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1095-102.
40. Møller A. P. & Erritzøe J. (2010) Flight distance and eye size in birds. Ethology 116, 458-65.
41. Møller A. P., Nielsen J. T. & Garamszegi L. Z. (2008) Risk taking by singing males. Behav. Ecol. 19, 41-53.
42. Nicolakakis N., Sol D. & Lefebvre L. (2003) Behavioural flexibility predicts species richness in birds, but not extinction risk. Anim. Behav. 65, 445-52.
43. Pagel M. (1997) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26, 331-48.
44. Pagel M. (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877-84.
45. Porter C. & Wescott G. (2004) Recreational use of a marine protected area: Point Lonsdale, Victoria. Aust. J. Environ. Manage. 11, 201-11.
46. Price M. (2008) The impact of human disturbance on birds: a selective review. In: Too Close for Comfort: Contentious Issues in Human-Wildlife Encounters (eds D. Lunney, A. Munn & W. Meikle ) pp. 163-96. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman.
47. Shultz S., Bradbury R. B., Evans K. L., Gregory R. D. & Blackburn T. M. (2005) Brain size and resource specialization predict long-term population trends in British birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272, 2305-11.
48. Shultz S. & Dunbar R. I. M. (2007) The evolution of the social brain: anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274, 2429-36.
49. Sol D. (2009) Revisiting the cognitive buffer hypothesis for the evolution of large brains. Biol. Lett. 5, 130-3.
50. Sol D., Duncan R. P., Blackburn T. M., Cassey P. & Lefebvre L. (2005a) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5460-5.
51. Sol D., Lefebvre L. & Rodriguez-Teijeiro J. D. (2005b) Brain size, innovative propensity and migratory behaviour in temperate Palaearctic birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1433-41.
52. Sol D., Székely T., Liker A. & Lefebvre L. (2007) Big-brained birds survive better in nature. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274, 763-9.
53. Symonds M. R. E. & Moussalli A. (2011) A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 13-21.
54. Taylor I. R. (2006) Managing visitor disturbance of waterbirds on Australian inland wetlands. In: Wetlands of the Murrumbidgee River Catchment: Practical Management in An Altered Environment (eds I. R. Taylor, P. A. Murray & S. G. Taylor ) pp. 150-7. Fivebough and Tuckerbil Wetlands Trust, Leeton.
55. Thomas G. H., Wills M. A. & Székely T. (2004) A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC Evol. Biol. 4, 28.
56. Underwood A. J. & Kennelly S. J. (1990) Pilot studies for designs of human disturbance of intertidal habitats in New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 41, 165-73.
57. Weston M. A. & Elgar M. A. (2005) Disturbance to brood-rearing hooded plover Thinornis rubricollis: responses and consequences. Bird Conserv. Int. 15, 193-209.
58. Weston M. A. & Elgar M. A. (2007) Responses of incubating hooded plovers (Thinornis rubricollis) to disturbance. J. Coastal Res. 23, 569-76.
59. Weston M. A., McLeod E. M., Blumstein D. T. & Guay P.-J. (in press) A review of flight initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu.
60. Ydenberg R. C. & Dill L. M. (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Study Behav. 16, 229-49.