Prolegomena to integrating cognitive modeling and social simulation

Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 3-26

  Sun, Ron ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879716973     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610721.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Alexander, J., Giesen, B., Munch, R., & Smelser, N. (Eds.), (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press, Berkeley.
2. Andersen, S., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619-645.
3. Anderson, J., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2003). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterin- tuition, commitment, compassion, and communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in press.
5. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6. Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating Social Phenomena, 21-40, Berlin: Springer.
7. Axtell, R., Axelrod, J., & Cohen, M. (1996). Aligning simulation models: A case study and results. Computational and Mathematica! Organization Theory, 1(2), 123-141.
8. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychol- ogy and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Bickhard, M. (1993). Representational content in humans and machines. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5, 285-333.
10. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Boyer, P., & Ramble, C. (2001). Cognitive templates for religious concepts: Cross- cultural evidence for recall of counter-intuitive representations. Cognitive Science, 25,535-564.
12. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
13. Camerer, C. (1997). Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspec- tives, 11(4), 167-188.
14. Carley, K., & Newell, A. (1994). The nature of social agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19(4), 221-262.
15. Castelfranchi, C. (2001). The theory of social functions: Challenges for computa- tional social science and multi-agent learning. Cognitive Systems Research (Special issue on multidisciplinary studies of multi-agent learning, R. Sun. Ed.), 2(1), 5-38.
16. Cecconi, F., & Parisi, D. (1998). Individual versus social survival strategies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 1(2), 1-17.
17. Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., & Terna, P. (eds.), (1997). Simulating social phenomena. Berlin: Springer.
18. Coward, L. A., & Sun, R. (2004). Criteria for an effective theory of consciousness and some preliminary attempts. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 268-301.
19. Damasio, A. (1994). Decartes' Error. Grosset/Putnam, New York.
20. Durkheim, W. (1895/1962). The rules of the sociological method. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
21. Epstein, J., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Fodor, J. (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417-424.
23. Gilbert, N. (1995). Simulation: An emergent perspective. Conference on New Tech- nologies in the Social Sciences. Bournemouth, UK.
24. Gilbert, N., & Conte, R. (eds), (1995). Artificial societies. London: UCL Press.
25. Gilbert, N., & Doran, J. (1994). Simulating societies: The computer simulation of social phenomena. London, UK: UCL Press.
26. Gray, W., & Altmann, E. (2001). Cognitive modeling and human-computer interaction. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors: Vol. 1, pp. 387-391. New York: Taylor and Francis.
27. Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe. New York: Norton.
28. Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265-288.
30. Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. New York: Pantheon Books.
31. Kahan, J., & Rapoport, A. (1984). Theories of coalition formation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Kenrick, D., Li, N., & Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110(1), 3-28.
33. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. LeDoux, J. (1992). Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2(2), 191-197.
35. Mataric, M. (2001). Learning in behavior-based multi-robot systems: Policies, mod- els, and other agents. Cognitive Systems Research, 2(1), 81-93.
36. Milner, D., & Goodale, N. (1995). The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Moss, S. (1999). Relevance, realism and rigour: A third way for social and economic research. (CPM Report No. 99-56). Manchester, UK: Center for Policy Analysis, Manchester Metropolitan University.
38. Moss, S., & Davidsson P. (eds.), (2001). Multi-Agent-Based Simulation. Berlin: Springer.
39. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Nisbett, R., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
41. Nolfi, S., & Floreano, D. (1999). Learning and evolution. Autonomous Robots, 7(1), 89-113.
42. Pew, R., & Mavor, A. (eds), (1998). Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
44. Prietula, M., Carley, K., & Gasser, L. (eds.), (1998). Simulating Organizations: Com- putational Models of Institutions and Groups. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Ritter, F., Shadbolt, N., Elliman, D., Young, R., Gobet, F., & Baxter, G. (2003). Tech- niques for Modeling Human Performance in Synthetic Environments: A Supplemen- tary Review. Human Systems Information Analysis Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH.
46. Rizzello, S., & Turvani, M. (2000). Institutions meet mind: The way out of an impasse. Constitutional Political Economy, 11,165-180.
47. Rumelhart, D., McClelland, J., & The PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Sawyer, R. (2003). Multiagent systems and the micro-macro link in sociological theory. Sociological Methods and Research, 31(3), 325-363.
49. Schunn, C., & Gray, W. (2002). Introduction to the special issue on computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(1), 1-3.
50. Smith, A. (1976). The wealth of nations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
51. Sun, R. (2001a). Individual action and collective function: From sociology to multiagent learning. Cognitive Systems Research, 2(1), 1-3.
52. Sun, R. (2001b). Cognitive science meets multi-agent systems: A prolegomenon. Philosophical Psychology, 14(1), 5-28.
53. Sun, R. (2002). Duality of the mind. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Sun, R. (2004). Desiderata for cognitive architectures. Philosophical Psychology, 17(3), 341-373.
55. Sun, R., Coward, A., & Zenzen, M. (2004). On levels of cognitive modeling. Philosophical Psychology, in press.
56. Thagard, P. (1992). Adversarial problem solving: Modeling an opponent using ex- planatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 16,123-149.
57. van Fraasen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
58. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.