Inositol kinase and its product accelerate wound healing by modulating calcium levels, Rho GTPases, and F-actin assembly

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 27, 2013, Pages 11029-11034

  Soto, Ximena ^a   Li, Jingjing ^a   Lea, Robert ^a   Dubaissi, Eamon ^a   Papalopulu, Nancy ^a   Amaya, Enrique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; F ACTIN; INOSITOL 1,3,4,5 TETRAKISPHOSPHATE; INOSITOL TRIPHOSPHATE 3 KINASE B; INOSITOL TRISPHOSPHATE 3 KINASE; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CALCIUM SIGNALING; CALCIUM TRANSPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; EMBRYO; ENZYME ACTIVITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; WOUND HEALING; XENOPUS;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; CALCIUM; CALCIUM SIGNALING; ECTODERM; EPIDERMIS; FEMALE; GENE KNOCKDOWN TECHNIQUES; INOSITOL PHOSPHATES; OOCYTES; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASES (ALCOHOL GROUP ACCEPTOR); RHO GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; WOUND HEALING; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS PROTEINS;

EID: 84879701435     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1217308110     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Nodder S, Martin P (1997) Wound healing in embryos: A review. Anat Embryol (Berl) 195(3):215-228. (Pubitemid 27116444)
2. Davidson LA, Ezin AM, Keller R (2002) Embryonic wound healing by apical contraction and ingression in Xenopus laevis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 53(3):163-176. (Pubitemid 35154918)
3. Yoshii Y, Noda M, Matsuzaki T, Ihara S (2005) Wound healing ability of Xenopus laevis embryos. I. Rapid wound closure achieved by bisectional half embryos. Dev Growth Differ 47(8):553-561. (Pubitemid 43002134)
4. Stanisstreet M (1982) Calcium and wound healing in Xenopus early embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 67:195-205.
5. Clark AG, et al. (2009) Integration of single and multicellular wound responses. Curr Biol 19(16):1389-1395.
6. Burkel BM, Benink HA, Vaughan EM, von Dassow G, Bement WM (2012) A Rho GTPase signal treadmill backs a contractile array. Dev Cell 23(2):384-396.
7. Irvine RF, Moor RM (1986) Micro-injection of inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate activates sea urchin eggs by a mechanism dependent on external Ca2+. Biochem J 240(3):917-920. (Pubitemid 17010017)
8. Morris AP, Gallacher DV, Irvine RF, Petersen OH (1987) Synergism of inositol trisphosphate and tetrakisphosphate in activating Ca2+-dependent K+ channels. Nature 330(6149):653-655. (Pubitemid 18005579)
9. DeLisle S, Pittet D, Potter BV, Lew PD, Welsh MJ (1992) InsP3 and Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 act in synergy to stimulate influx of extracellular Ca2+ in Xenopus oocytes. Am J Physiol 262(6 Pt 1):C1456-C1463.
10. Smith PM, Harmer AR, Letcher AJ, Irvine RF (2000) The effect of inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate on inositol trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ mobilization in freshly isolated and cultured mouse lacrimal acinar cells. Biochem J 347(Pt 1):77-82. (Pubitemid 30199043)
11. Irvine RF, Schell MJ (2001) Back in the water: The return of the inositol phosphates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(5):327-338. (Pubitemid 33674045)
12. Pattni K, Banting G (2004) Ins(1,4,5)P3 metabolism and the family of IP3-3Kinases. Cell Signal 16(6):643-654.
13. Okabayashi K, Asashima M (2003) Tissue generation from amphibian animal caps. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13(5):502-507. (Pubitemid 37204927)
14. Kim SH, Yamamoto A, Bouwmeester T, Agius E, Robertis EM (1998) The role of paraxial protocadherin in selective adhesion and cell movements of the mesoderm during Xenopus gastrulation. Development 125(23):4681-4690. (Pubitemid 29027198)
15. Brehm MA, Schreiber I, Bertsch U, Wegner A, Mayr GW (2004) Identification of the actin-binding domain of Ins(1,4,5)P3 3-kinase isoform B (IP3K-B). Biochem J 382(Pt 1):353-362. (Pubitemid 39141599)
16. Nalaskowski MM, et al. (2011) Human inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase isoform B (IP3KB) is a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling protein specifically enriched at cortical actin filaments and at invaginations of the nuclear envelope. J Biol Chem 286(6):4500-4510.
17. Brock J, Midwinter K, Lewis J, Martin P (1996) Healing of incisional wounds in the embryonic chick wing bud: Characterization of the actin purse-string and demonstration of a requirement for Rho activation. J Cell Biol 135(4):1097-1107. (Pubitemid 26403781)
18. Kofron M, Heasman J, Lang SA, Wylie CC (2002) Plakoglobin is required for maintenance of the cortical actin skeleton in early Xenopus embryos and for cdc42-mediated wound healing. J Cell Biol 158(4):695-708. (Pubitemid 34920108)
19. Benard V, Bohl BP, Bokoch GM (1999) Characterization of rac and cdc42 activation in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophils using a novel assay for active GTPases. J Biol Chem 274(19):13198-13204.
20. Benink HA, Bement WM (2005) Concentric zones of active RhoA and Cdc42 around single cell wounds. J Cell Biol 168(3):429-439. (Pubitemid 40205065)
21. 2+ signaling pathway promotes actin-mediated epidermal wound closure in C. elegans. Curr Biol 21(23):1960-1967.
22. 2+ indicators. Science 333(6051):1888-1891.
23. Yu HY, Bement WM (2007) Control of local actin assembly by membrane fusiondependent compartment mixing. Nat Cell Biol 9(2):149-159.
24. Stutzmann GE, Mattson MP (2011) Endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) handling in excitable cells in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev 63(3):700-727.
25. Shaw TJ, Martin P (2009) Wound repair at a glance. J Cell Sci 122(Pt 18):3209-3213.
26. Mandato CA, Bement WM (2003) Actomyosin transports microtubules and microtubules control actomyosin recruitment during Xenopus oocyte wound healing. Curr Biol 13(13):1096-1105. (Pubitemid 36815257)
27. Abreu-Blanco MT, Verboon JM, Parkhurst SM (2011) Cell wound repair in Drosophila occurs through three distinct phases of membrane and cytoskeletal remodeling. J Cell Biol 193(3):455-464.
28. Wood W, et al. (2002) Wound healing recapitulates morphogenesis in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol 4(11):907-912. (Pubitemid 35331367)
29. Sonnemann KJ, Bement WM (2011) Wound repair: Toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27:237-263.
30. Bement WM, Yu HY, Burkel BM, Vaughan EM, Clark AG (2007) Rehabilitation and the single cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19(1):95-100. (Pubitemid 46123967)
31. McNeil PL, Steinhardt RA (2003) Plasma membrane disruption: Repair, prevention, adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:697-731. (Pubitemid 37487366)
32. Rossman KL, Der CJ, Sondek J (2005) GEF means go: Turning on RHO GTPases with guanine nucleotide-exchange factors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6(2):167-180. (Pubitemid 40215811)
33. Feig LA (2011) Regulation of neuronal function by Ras-GRF exchange factors. Genes Cancer 2(3):306-319.
34. Millard TH, Martin P (2008) Dynamic analysis of filopodial interactions during the zippering phase of Drosophila dorsal closure. Development 135(4):621-626. (Pubitemid 351405015)
35. Benard V, Bokoch GM (2002) Assay of Cdc42, Rac, and Rho GTPase activation by affinity methods. Methods Enzymol 345:349-359. (Pubitemid 32954108)