Wound healing ability of Xenopus laevis embryos. I. Rapid wound closure achieved by bisectional half embryos

Development Growth and Differentiation

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 553-561

  Yoshii, Yasuko ^a   Noda, Masahiro ^a   Matsuzaki, Takashi ^a   Ihara, Setsunosuke ^a  

^a SHIMANE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Epidermis; Wound closure; Wound healing; Xenopus laevis

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MOTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; EMBRYO; EPIDERMIS; EPITHELIUM; EYE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; INFLAMMATORY CELL; MALE; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; SURVIVAL TIME; TADPOLE; THEORETICAL STUDY; VIDEORECORDING; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FEMALE; MALE; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALIA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 29344456118     PISSN: 00121592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2005.00830.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bakin, A. V., Tomlinson, A. K., Bhowmick, N. A., Moses, H. L. & Arteaga, C. L. 2000. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for transforming growth factor beta-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36 803-36 810.
2. Bement, W. M., Forscher, P. & Mooseker, M. S. 1993. A novel cytoskeletal structure involved in purse string wound closure and cell polarity maintenance. J. Cell Biol. 121, 565-578.
3. Bement, W. M., Mandato, C. A. & Kirsch, M. N. 1999. Wound-induced assembly and closure of an actomyosin purse string in Xenopus oocytes. Curr. Biol. 9, 579-587.
4. Braga, V. M., Betson, M., Li, X. & Lamarche-Vane, N. 2000. Activation of the small GTPase Rac is sufficient to disrupt cadherin-dependent cell-cell adhesion in normal human keratinocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3703-3721.
5. Burrington, J. D. 1971. Wound healing in the fetal lamb. J. Pediatric Surg. 6, 523-528.
6. Ciruna, B. & Rossant, J. 2001. FGF signaling regulates mesoderm cell fate specification and morphogenetic movement at the primitive streak. Dev. Cell 1, 37-49.
7. Clark, R. A. F. 1996. Wound Repair: Overview and general considerations. In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (ed. R. A. F. Clark), pp. 3-50. Plenum Press, New York.
8. Davidson, L. A., Ezin, A. M. & Keller, R. 2002. Embryonic wound healing by apical contraction and ingression in Xenopus laevis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 53, 163-176.
9. Dixon, J. B. 1960. Inflammation in the foetal and neonatal rat: the local reactions to skin burns. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 80, 73-82.
10. Ferguson, M. W. & O'Kane, S. 2004. Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention. Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 839-850.
11. Gilbert, S. F. 2003. Developmental Biology, 7th edn. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland.
12. Grose, R. & Martin, P. 1999. Parallels between wound repair and morphogenesis in the embryo. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 395-404.
13. Hasegawa, K. & Kinoshita, T. 2000. Xoom is required for epibolic movement of animal ectodermal cells in Xenopus laevis gastrulation. Dev. Growth Differ. 42, 337-346.
14. Ihara, S. & Motobayashi, Y. 1992. Wound closure in foetal rat skin. Development 114, 573-582.
15. Ihara, S., Motobayashi, Y., Nagao, E. & Kistler, A. 1990. Ontogenetic transition of wound healing pattern in rat skin occurring at the fetal stage. Development 110, 671-680.
16. Jacinto, A., Wood, W., Balayo, T., Turmaine, M., Martinez-Arias, A. & Martin, P. 2000. Dynamic actin-based epithelial adhesion and cell matching during Drosophila dorsal closure. Curr. Biol. 10, 1420-1426.
17. Jacinto, A., Woolner, S. & Martin, P. 2002. Dynamic analysis of dorsal closure in Drosophila: from genetics to cell biology. Dev. Cell 3, 9-19.
18. Koivisto, L., Alavian, K., Hakkinen, L., Pelech, S., McCulloch, C. A. & Larjava, H. 2003. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 regulates formation of long lamellipodia in human keratinocytes. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3749-3760.
19. Koizumi, M., Matsuzaki, T. & Ihara, S. 2004. The subsets of keratinocytes responsible for covering open wounds in neonatal rat skin. Cell Tissue Res. 315, 187-195.
20. Koizumi, M., Matsuzaki, T. & Ihara, S. 2005. Expression of P-cadherin distinct from that of E-cadherin in re-epithelialization in neonatal rat skin. Dev. Growth Differ. 47, 75-85.
21. Li, G., Gustafson-Brown, C., Hanks, S. K. et al. 2003. c-Jun is essential for organization of the epidermal leading edge. Dev. Cell 4, 865-877.
22. Longaker, M. T. & Adzick, N. S. 1990. The biology of fetal wound healing: a review. Plast. Reconst Surg. 87, 788-798.
23. Mandato, C. A. & Bement, W. M. 2001. Contraction and polymerization cooperate to assemble and close actomyosin rings around Xenopus oocyte wounds. J. Cell Biol. 154, 785-797.
24. Mandato, C. A. & Bement, W. M. 2003. Actomyosin transports microtubules and microtubules control actomyosin recruitment during Xenopus oocyte wound healing. Curr. Biol. 13, 1096-1105.
25. Martin, P. 1996. Mechanisms of wound healing in the embryo and fetus. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. 32, 175-203.
26. Martin, P. 1997. Wound healing-aiming for perfect skin regeneration. Science 276, 75-81.
27. Martin, P. & Lewis, J. 1992. Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing. Nature 360, 179-183.
28. Martin, P. & Parkhurst, S. M. 2004. Parallels between tissue repair and embryo morphogenesis. Development 131, 3021-3034.
29. Matsubayashi, Y., Ebisuya, M., Honjoh, S. & Nishida, E. 2004. ERK activation propagates in epithelial cell sheets and regulates their migration during wound healing. Curr. Biol. 14, 731-735.
30. McCallion, R. L. & Ferguson, M. W. J. 1996. Fetal wound healing and the development of antiscarring therapies for adult wound healing. In: The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (ed. R. A. F. Clark), pp. 561-600. Plenum Press, New York.
31. McCluskey, J. & Martin, P. 1995. Analysis of the tissue movements of embryonic wound healing - Dil studies in the limb bud stage mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 170, 102-114.
32. Nieuwkoop, R. D. & Faber, J. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
33. Nodder, S. & Martin, P. 1997. Wound healing in embryos: a review. Anat Embryol. 195, 215-228.
34. Rajnicek, A. M., Stump, R. F. & Robinson, K. R. 1988. An endogenous sodium current may mediate wound healing in Xenopus neurulae. Dev. Biol. 128, 290-299.
35. Redd, M. J., Cooper, L., Wood, W., Stramer, B. & Martin, P. 2004. Wound healing and inflammation: embryos reveal the way to perfect repair. Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 777-784.
36. Ridley, A. J., Schwartz, M. A., Burridge, K. et al. 2003. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 302, 1704-1709.
37. Sive, H. L., Grainger, R. M. & Harland, R. M. 1998. Early development of Xenopus laevis: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
38. Stanisstreet, M., Wakely, J. & England, M. 1980. Scanning electron microscopy of wound healing in Xenopus and chicken embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 59, 341-353.
39. Sun, X., Meyers, E. N., Lewandoski, M. & Martin, G. R. 1999. Targeted disruption of Fgf8 causes failure of cell migration in the gastrulating mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 13, 1834-1846.
40. Yoshii, Y., Matsuzaki, T., Ishida, H. & Ihara, S. 2005. Wound healing ability of Xenopus laevis embryos. II. Morphological analysis of wound marginal epidermis. Develop. Growth Differ. 47, 563-571.