Effects of low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles on angiogenesis-associated proteins in subcutaneous tumors of nude mice

Oncology Reports

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 842-850

  Shen, Zhi Yong ^a,b   Shen, E ^a   Zhang, Ji Zhen ^a   Bai, Wen Kun ^a   Wang, Yu ^a   Yang, Shao Lin ^a   Nan, Shu Liang ^a   Lin, Yan Duan ^a   Li, Yi ^a   Hu, Bing ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED SIXTH PEOPLE S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b NANTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cavitation; Contrast agent; Low frequency; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CYCLOOXYGENASE 2; SONOVUE; VASCULOTROPIN;

ANGIOGENESIS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYTOPLASM; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LASER CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; LOW FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND; MALE; MICROBUBBLE; MOUSE; NICK END LABELING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SUBCUTANEOUS TUMOR; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM;

ANIMALS; APOPTOSIS; CONNECTIVE TISSUE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2; CYTOPLASM; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; MALE; MICE; MICE, NUDE; MICROBUBBLES; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE; ULTRASONICS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 84879673865     PISSN: 1021335X     EISSN: 17912431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3892/or.2013.2492     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Samant RS and Shevde LA: Recent advances in anti-angiogenic therapy of cancer. Oncotarget 2: 122-134, 2011.
2. Sherwood LM, Parris EE and Folkman J: Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 285: 1182-1186, 1971.
3. Hwang JH, Brayman AA, Reidy MA, Matula TJ, Kimmey MB and Crum LA: Vascular effects induced by combined 1-MHz ultrasound and microbubble contrast agent treatments in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol 31: 553-564, 2005.
4. Skyba DM, Price RJ, Linka AZ, Skalak TC and Kaul S: Direct in vivo visualization of intravascular destruction of microbubbles by ultrasound and its local effects on tissue. Circulation 98: 290-293, 1998. (Pubitemid 28348049)
5. Wood AKW, Ansaloni S, Ziemer LS, Lee WMF, Feldman MD and Sehgal CM: The antivascular action of physiotherapy ultrasound on murine tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 31: 1403-1410, 2005. (Pubitemid 41434057)
6. Wood AKW, Bunte RM, Price HE, et al: The disruption of murine tumor neovasculature by low-intensity ultrasound-comparison between 1- and 3-MHz sonication frequencies. Acad Radiol 15: 1133-1141, 2008.
7. Wollina U, Heinig B, Naumann G, Scheibe A, Schmidt WD and Neugebauer R: Effects of low-frequency ultrasound on microcirculation in venous leg ulcers. Indian J Dermatol 56: 174-179, 2011.
8. Barnett SB, Rott HD, ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC and Maeda K: The sensitivity of biological tissue to ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 23: 805-812, 1997. (Pubitemid 27349527)
9. Johnson CA, Sarwate S, Miller RJ and O'Brien WD Jr: A temporal study of ultrasound contrast agent-induced changes in capillary density. J Ultrasound Med 29: 1267-1275, 2010.
10. Yang X and Church CC: A model for the dynamics of gas bubbles in soft tissue. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 3595-3606, 2005. (Pubitemid 41820862)
11. Hutcheson J, Schlicher R, Hicks H and Prausnitz M: Saving cells from ultrasound-induced apoptosis: quantification of cell death and uptake following sonication and effects of targeted calcium chelation. Ultrasound Med Biol 36: 1008-1021, 2010.
12. Lassau N, Chami L, Benatsou B, Peronneau P and Roche A: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) with quantification of tumor perfusion: a new diagnostic tool to evaluate the early effects of antiangiogenic treatment. Eur Radiol 17: F89-F98, 2007. (Pubitemid 351337913)
13. Paprottka P, Cyran C, Zengel P, et al: Non-invasive contrast enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of tumor microcirculation. Contrast mixed mode examination vs. only contrast enhanced ultrasound examination. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 46: 149-158, 2010.
14. Yu SM and Kim SJ: Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-stress) by 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) reduces cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and N-glycosylation and induces a loss of COX-2 activity via a Src kinase-dependent pathway in rabbit articular chondrocytes. Exp Mol Med 42: 777-786, 2010.
15. Forsberg F, Dicker AP, Thakur ML, et al: Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 28: 445-451, 2002. (Pubitemid 34603764)
16. Kotturi H, Li J, Branham-O'Connor M, et al: Tumor cells expressing a fusion protein of MULT1 and Fas are rejected in vivo by apoptosis and NK cell activation. Gene Ther 15: 1302-1310, 2008.
17. Feril LB Jr and Kondo T: Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J Radiat Res 45: 479-489, 2004.
18. Miller DL and Dou C: Induction of apoptosis in sonoporation and ultrasonic gene transfer. Ultrasound Med Biol 35: 144-154, 2009.
19. Forsberg F, Ro RJ, Fox TB, et al: Contrast enhanced maximum intensity projection ultrasound imaging for assessing angiogenesis in murine glioma and breast tumor models: a comparative study. Ultrasonics 51: 382-389, 2011.
20. Wang J, Lv F, Fei X, et al: Study on the characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and its utility in assessing the microvessel density in ovarian tumors or tumor-like lesions. Int J Biol Sci 7: 600-606, 2011.
21. Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang LY, et al: BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64: 7099-7109, 2004. (Pubitemid 39331023)
22. Lavisse S, Lejeune P, Rouffiac V, et al: Early quantitative evaluation of a tumor vasculature disruptive agent AVE8062 using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Invest Radiol 43: 100-111, 2008.
23. Chan TA: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, apoptosis, and colon-cancer chemoprevention. Lancet Oncol 3: 166-174, 2002.
24. Lu J, Min W, Conchello JA, Xie XS and Lichtman JW: Super-resolution laser scanning microscopy through spatiotemporal modulation. Nano Lett 9: 3883-3889, 2009.
25. Ashush H, Rozenszajn LA, Blass M, et al: Apoptosis induction of human myeloid leukemic cells by ultrasound exposure. Cancer Res 60: 1014-1020, 2000. (Pubitemid 30129539)
26. Honda H, Zhao QL and Kondo T: Effects of dissolved gases and an echo contrast agent on apoptosis induced by ultrasound and its mechanism via the mitochondria-caspase pathway. Ultrasound Med Biol 28: 673-682, 2002. (Pubitemid 34665425)
27. Feril LB, Kondo T, Zhao QL, et al: Enhancement of ultrasound-induced apoptosis and cell lysis by echo-contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 29: 331-337, 2003. (Pubitemid 36355855)
28. Chen H, Brayman AA, Bailey MR and Matula TJ: Blood vessel rupture by cavitation. Urol Res 38: 321-326, 2010.
29. Tian ZM, Wan MX, Lu MZ, Wang XD and Wang L: The alteration of protein profile of Walker 256 carinosarcoma cells during the apoptotic process induced by ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 31: 121-128, 2005.