‘MODERATION IN ALL THINGS’: INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF GOVERNANCE QUALITY

Financial Accountability and Management

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 437-457

  Pollitt, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

governance; indicators; international comparison; measurement; quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879645381     PISSN: 02674424     EISSN: 14680408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00532.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Accenture (2008), An International Comparison of the United Kingdom's Public Administration (London, Accenture).
2. Advisory Group on Reform of Australian Government Administration (2009), The Reform of Australian Government Administration: Building the World's Best Public Service (Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia, October).
3. Alfonso, A., L. Schuknecht and V. Tanzi (2003), Public Sector Efficiency: An International Comparison, European Central Bank Working Paper No.242.
4. Alonso, W. and P. Starr (eds.) (1987), The Politics of Numbers (New York, Russell Sage Foundation).
5. Andrews, M. (2008), ‘The Good Governance Agenda: Beyond Indicators without Theory’, Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 379–407.
6. Arndt, C. (2008), ‘The Politics of Governance Ratings’, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 1–23.
7. Arndt, C. and C. Oman (2006), Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators (Paris, OECD, Development Centre Studies).
8. Bannister, F. (2007), ‘The Curse of the Benchmark: An Asessment of the Validity and Value of e-government Comparisons’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 73:2, pp. 171–88.
9. Besançon, M. (2003), Good Governance Rankings; The Art of Measurement, WPF Reports No.36 (Cambridge MA, World Peace Foundation).
10. Bevan, G. and C. Hood (2006), ‘What's Measured is what Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System’, Public Administration, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 517–38.
11. Bovaird, T. and E. Löffler (2003), ‘Evaluating the Quality of Public Governance: Indicators, Models and Methodologies’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 313–28.
12. Boyle, D. (2004), The Sum of Our Discontents: Why Numbers Make Us Irrational (NewYork, Thomson Texere).
13. Boyne, G., K. Meier, L. O’Toole Jnr. and R. Walker (eds.), Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
14. Bruijn, H. de (2002), Managing Performance in the Public Sector (London, Routledge).
15. Cabinet Office (2008), Excellence and Fairness: Achieving World Class Public Services (London, Cabinet Office).
16. Clarke, J. (2005), ‘Performing for the Public: Doubt, Desire and the Evaluation of Public Services’, in P. Du Gay (ed.), The Values of Bureaucracy (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp, 211–32.
17. Cummings, E. (1960), Selected Poems, 1923–1958 (London, Faber).
18. Daily Mail (2007), ‘Why Our Schools have Plunged in World League Tables Despite Billions being Spent’ (http://dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html, accessed 6 December 2007).
19. Desrosières, A. (1998), The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).
20. Eberstadt, N. (1995), The Tyranny of Numbers: Measurement and Misrule (Washington DC, AEI Press).
21. Elton, L. (2000), ‘The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences’, Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 274–83.
22. European Commission (2007), Special Eurobarometer: Europeans’ Knowledge of Economic Indicators (Luxembourg, European Commission).
23. Fellegi, I. (2004), ‘Official Statistics – Pressures and Challenges: ISI President's Invited Lecture, 2003’, International Statistical Review, Vol. 72, No. 1, pp. 139–55.
24. Frederickson, H.G. (2005), ‘Whatever Happened to Public Administration? Governance, Governance Everywhere’, pp. 282–304 in E. Ferlie, L. Lynn Jnr. and C. Pollitt (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
25. Frederickson, D.G and H.G. Frederickson (2007), Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State (Washington DC, Georgetown University Press).
26. Gaster, L. and A. Squires (eds.) (2003), Providing Quality in the Public Sector: A Practical Approach to Improving Public Services (Maidenhead, Open University Press).
27. Goldstein, H. (2004), ‘International Comparisons of Student Attainment: Some Issues Arising from the PISA Study’, Assessment in Education, Vol. 11, No. 3 (November).
28. Grek, S. (2008), PISA in the British Media: Leaning Tower or Robust Testing Tool?, CES Briefing no.45, Centre for Educational Sociology (University of Edinburgh, April).
29. Guha, K. and R. McGregor (2007), ‘World Bank Directors Test Zoellick’, Financial Times, 13 July (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fe1d7ece-30d8-11dc-0a81--0000779fd2ac.html, accessed 23 November, 2007).
30. Hauner, D. and A. Kyobe (2008), Determinants of Government Efficiency, Washington DC, IMF Working Paper 08/228.
31. Hibbard, J., P. Slovic and J. Jewett (1997), ‘Informing Consumer Decisions in Health Care: Implications from Decision-Making Research’, The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 395–414.
32. Hirst, P. (2000), ‘Democracy and Governance’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 13–35.
33. Hood, C. (2007), ‘Public Service Management by Numbers: Why Does it Vary? Where Has it Come From? What Are the Gaps and the Puzzles?’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 95–102.
34. Hood, C., R. Dixon and C. Beeston (2008), ‘Rating the Rankings: Assessing International Rankings of Public Service Performance’, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 298–358.
35. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) (2007), Datagob: Governance Indicator Database (http://www.iadb.org/datagob/ accessed 01–09-08).
36. IpsosReid Corporation (2002), Survey of Parliamentarians, submitted to the Office of the Auditor General of Canada.
37. Jacobs, R., M. Goddard and P. Smith (2006), Public Services: Are Composite Measures a Robust Reflection of Performance in the Public Sector?, University of York, Centre for Health Economics Research Paper 16 (June).
38. Jenei, G. and L. Gulácsi (2004), ‘Do Western Quality Models Work in CEE Countries? Some Insights from the Hungarian Perspective’, in E. Löffler and M. Vintar (eds.), Improving the Quality of East and West European Public Services (Aldershot, Ashgate). pp. 107–16.
39. Johnsen, Å. (2009), Performance Information and Public Policy: Why Do Bad Results Get All Attention, Paper presented to the Study Group on Performanec in the Public Sector, European Group for Public Administration Conference, St Julian's, Malta (2–5 September).
40. Johnson, D. and T. Zajonc (2006) ‘Can Foreign Aid Create an Incentive For Good Governance? Evidence From the Millenium Challenge Corporation’, Conference Paper (Harvard University, April 11).
41. Kaufmann, D., A. Kray and M. Mastruzzi (2004), ‘Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators For 1996–2002’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3106.
42. Kaufmann, D., A. Kray and M. Mastruzzi (2007), ‘Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2006’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4280 (July).
43. Kaufmann, D., A. Kray and M. Mastruzzi (2009), ‘Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators For 1996–2008’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4978.
44. Kaufmann, D., A. Kray and P. Zoido-Lobatón (1999), ‘Aggregating Governance Indicators’, Policy Research Working Paper 2195 (Washington DC, World Bank).
45. Magee, H., L-J. Davis and A. Coulter (2003), ‘Public Views on Healthcare Performance Indicators and Patient Choice’, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 96, pp. 338–42, (July).
46. Moran, M. (2003), The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
47. Next Steps Team (1998), Towards Best Practice: An Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Public Sector Benchmarking Project, 1996–98 (London, Efficiency and Effectiveness Group, Cabinet Office).
48. OECD (2009a), Government at a Glance 2009 (Paris, OECD).
49. OECD (2009b), Measuring Government Activity (Paris, OECD).
50. Pollitt, C. (2006a), ‘Performance Information for Democracy: The Missing Link?’, Evaluation, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 39–56.
51. Pollitt, C. (2006b), ‘Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp, 25–44.
52. Pollitt, C. (2010), ‘Simply the Best? The International Benchmarking of Reform and Good Governance’, in J. Pierre and P. Ingraham (eds.), Comparative Administrative Change and Reform: Lessons Learned (Monteal and Kingston, McGill-Queen's University Press), pp. 91–113.
53. Pollitt, C. and P. Hupe (2011), ‘Talking About Government: The Role of Magic Concepts’, Public Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 641–58.
54. Pollitt, C., S. Harrison, G. Dowswell, S. Jerak-Zuiderent and R. Bal (2010), ‘Performance Regimes in Healthcare: Institutions, Critical Junctures and the Logic of Escalation’, Evaluation, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 13–29.
55. Porter, T. (1995), Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
56. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
57. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) (2007), Executive Summary (Paris, OECD (http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/2/0, accessed 22 January, 2008).
58. Rhodes, R. (2000), ‘Governance and Public Administration’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press), pp. 54–90.
59. Rothstein, B. and J. Teorell (2008), ‘What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions’, Governance, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 165–90.
60. Sanderson, I. (2004), ‘Getting Evidence into Practice: Perspectives on Rationality’, Evaluation Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 366–79.
61. Scott, J. (1998), Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven, Yale University Press).
62. Simon, H. (1955), ‘A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 69, pp. 99–118.
63. Smithers, R. (2002), ‘Schools Cheat to Boost Exam Results’, Guardian (5 June), p. 1.
64. Social and Cultural Planning Office (2004), Public Sector Performance; An International Comparison of Education, Health Care, Law and Order and Public Administration (The Hague, SCP).
65. Starr, P. and R. Corson (1987), ‘Who Will Have the Numbers? The Rise of the Statistical Services Industry and the Politics of Public Data’, in W. Alonso and P. Starr (eds.), The Politics of Numbers (New York, Russell Sage Foundation), pp. 415–47.
66. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (http://www.transparency.org/policy_researchsurveys_indices/cpi/2006, accessed 18–09-2008).
67. Tsoukas, H. (2005), Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
68. Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1974), ‘Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, Vol. 185, pp. 1124–31.
69. Van De Walle, S. (2006), ‘The State of the World's Bureaucracies’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 437–48.
70. Van De Walle, S and S. Roberts (2008), ‘Publishing Performance Information: An Illusion of Control?’, in W. Van Dooren and S. Van De Walle (eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Basingstoke, Palgrave/Macmillan).
71. Van De Walle, S, S. Van Roosbroek and G. Bouckaert (2008), ‘Trust in the Public Sector: Is There Any Evidence for a Long Term Decline?’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 47–64.
72. Van Dooren, W. and S. Van de Walle (eds.) (2008), Performance Information in the Public Sector: How it is Used (Basingstoke, Palgrave/Macmillan).
73. West, D. (2006), Global e-government 2006 (Rl. USA, Center for Public Policy, Brown University).