Video-Based Analyses of Motivation and Interaction in Science Classrooms

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 906-928

  Andersen, Hanne Moeller ^a   Nielsen, Birgitte Lund ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Analytical framework; Classroom; Motivation; Secondary school; Video analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879640198     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.627954     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F. and Scott, P. 2010. Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (2): 174 - 193.
2. Anderman, L. H. and Leake, V. S. 2005. The ABCs of motivation. An alternative framework for teaching preservice teachers about motivation. Clearing House: A Journal of Education Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78: 192 - 196.
3. Andersen, H. M. 2007. Veje til motivation og læring. Et studie af elevers opfattelse af forskellige faktorers betydning for motivation og læring i kemi- og biologiundervisningen på teknisk gymnasium [Students' motivation and learning in chemistry and biology. A study of the influence of the classroom setting on students' motivation and learning]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet
4. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Brophy, J. 2004. Motivating students to learn, New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Nakamura, J. 1989. " The dynamics of intrinsic motivation: A study of adolescents ". In Research on motivation in education. Goals and cognition, Edited by: Ames, C. and Ames, R. 45 - 71. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York, NY: Plenum Press.
8. Eccles, J. S. and Wigfield, A. 2002. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 109 - 132. (doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153)
9. Erickson, F. 2006. " Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales ". In Handbook of complementary methods in education research, Edited by: Green, J. L., Camilli, G., Elmore, P. B., Skukauskaite, A. and Grace, E. 177 - 189. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Fischer, H. E., Klemm, K., Leutner, D., Sumfleth, E., Tiemann, R. and Wirth, J. 2005. Framework for empirical research on science teaching and learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16: 309 - 349. (doi:10.1007/s10972-005-1106-2)
11. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. 2005. " Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences ". In The sage handbook of qualitative research, Edited by: Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. 191 - 216. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B. and Duschl, R. A. 2000. 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84 (6): 757 - 792. (doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F)
13. Klette, K. 2009. " Challenges in strategies for complexity reduction in video studies. Experiences from PISA+ study: A video study of teaching and learning in Norway ". In The power of video studies in studies of teaching and learning, Edited by: Janik, T. and Seidel, T. 61 - 82. Münster: Waxmann.
14. La Guardia, J. G. and Ryan, R. M. 2002. " What adolescents need. A self-determination theory perspective on development within families, school, and society ". In Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 193-219), Edited by: Pajares, F. and Urdan, T. Greenwich: Informatiom Age Publishing.
15. Mercer, N. and Hodgkinson, S. 2008. Exploring talk in schools. Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes, London: SAGE Publications.
16. Mortimer, E. F. and Scott, P. 2003. Meaning making in secondary science classrooms, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
17. Niemiec, C. P. and Ryan, R. M. 2009. Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7 (2): 133 - 144. (doi:10.1177/1477878509104318)
18. Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening dialogue. Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19. Nystrand, M. and Gamoran, A. 1991. Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25 (3): 261 - 290.
20. Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L. and Gamoran, A. 2001. Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse, Albany, NY: The National Research Center on English Learning & Achievement.
21. Ødegaard, M., Andersen, H. M., Nielsen, B. L., Løfgren, R., Schoultz, J., Hultman, G and Arnesen, N. 2009. EXPLORA-Nordic project on talking science during explorative work in science classrooms Paper presented at the ESERA 2009 conference, Istanbul
22. Ødegaard, M. and Arnesen, N. 2001. Coding scheme science: Language and discourse features. PISA+ study, Oslo: Oslo University.
23. Ødegaard, M. and Arnesen, N. 2010. Hva skjer i naturfagklasserommet? Resultater fra en videobasert klasseromsstudie; PISA+. [What is happening in science classrooms? Results from a video based classroom study; PISA+]. NorDiNa, 6(1) 16-32
24. Prenzel, M., Kramer, K. and Drechsel, B. 2002. " Self-determined and interested learning in vocational education ". In Teaching-learning processes in vocational education, Edited by: Beck, K. 43 - 68. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
25. Reeve, J. 2002. " Self-determination theory applied to educational settings ". In Handbook of self-determination research, Edited by: Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 183 - 203. Woodbridge, VA: University of Rochester Press.
26. Reeve, J., Bolt, E. and Cai, Y. 1999. Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (3): 537 - 548. (doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537)
27. Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F. and Aguiar, O. G. 2006. The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90 (4): 605 - 631. (doi:10.1002/sce.20131)
28. Seidel, T. 2006. The role of student characteristics in studying microteaching-learning environments. Learning Environment Research, 9: 253 - 271. (doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9012-x)
29. Watson, J. R. and Swain, J. R.L. 2004. Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (1): 25 - 45. (doi:10.1080/0950069032000072764)