Role of CPI-17 in restoring skin homoeostasis in cutaneous field of cancerization: Effects of topical application of a film-forming medical device containing photolyase and UV filters

Experimental Dermatology

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 494-496

  Puig Butillé, Joan Anton ^a,b   Malvehy, Josep ^a,b   Potrony, Miriam ^a,b   Trullas, Carles ^c   Garcia García, Francisco ^d   Dopazo, Joaquin ^b,d   Puig, Susana ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT D INVESTIGACIONS BIOMÈDIQUES AUGUST PI I SUNYER IDIBAPS   (Spain)

^b CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN BIOMÉDICA EN RED DE ENFERMEDADES RARAS CIBERER   (Spain)

^c ISDIN   (Spain)

^d CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN PRÍNCIPE FELIPE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Actinic keratoses; CPI 17; Cutaneous field of cancerization; Expression array; PPP1R14A

Indexed keywords

DEOXYRIBODIPYRIMIDINE PHOTOLYASE; LIPOSOME;

ACTINIC KERATOSIS; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CPI 17 GENE; CUTANEOUS FIELD OF CANCERIZATION; DNA REPAIR; FILTER; GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IL 1B GENE; MEDICAL DEVICE; PRECANCER; TNF GENE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WDR72 GENE;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; DEOXYRIBODIPYRIMIDINE PHOTO-LYASE; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, ENZYMOLOGIC; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; INFLAMMATION; LIPOSOMES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHOPROTEIN PHOSPHATASES; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES; SKIN; SKIN NEOPLASMS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 84879593422     PISSN: 09066705     EISSN: 16000625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/exd.12177     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Park W S, Lee H K, Lee J Y et al. Hum Pathol 1996: 27: 1180-1184.
2. Cockerell C J. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000: 42: 11-17.
3. Vink A A, Roza L. J Photochem Photobiol, B 2001: 65: 101-104.
4. Hoeijmakers J H. Nature 2001: 411: 366-374.
5. Bohr V A, Smith C A, Okumoto D S et al. Cell 1985: 40: 359-369.
6. Mitchell D L. Photochem Photobiol 1988: 48: 51-57.
7. Essen L O, Klar T. Cell Mol Life Sci 2006: 63: 1266-1277.
8. Jans J, Schul W, Sert Y G et al. Curr Biol 2005: 15: 105-115.
9. Stege H, Roza L, Vink A A et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000: 97: 1790-1795.
10. Eto M. J Biol Chem 2009: 284: 35273-35277.
11. Vural P, Canbaz M, Sekcuki D et al. Int J Dermatol 1999: 38: 439-442.
12. Maltusch A, Rowert-Huber J, Matthies C et al. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2011: 9: 1011-1017.
13. Fecker L F, Stockfleth E, Braun F K et al. J Invest Dermatol 2010: 130: 2098-2109.
14. Rodust P M, Fecker L F, Stockfleth E et al. Exp Dermatol 2012: 21: 520-525.
15. Eto M, Senba S, Morita F et al. FEBS Lett 1997: 410: 356-360.
16. Eto M, Bock R, Brautigan D L et al. Neuron 2002: 36: 1145-1158.
17. Woodsome T P, Eto M, Everett A et al. J Physiol 2001: 535: 553-564.
18. Jin H, Sperka T, Herrlich P et al. Nature 2006: 442: 576-579.
19. Xia D, Stull J T, Kamm K E. Exp Cell Res 2005: 304: 506-517.
20. Fresu M, Bianchi M, Parsons J T et al. Biochem J 2001: 358: 407-414.
21. Villa-Moruzzi E, Tognarini M, Cecchini G et al. Cell Adhes Commun 1998: 5: 297-305.
22. Kiss A, Lontay B, Becsi B et al. Cell Signal 2008: 20: 2059-2070.