Gaze-centered spatial updating in delayed reaching even in the presence of landmarks

Vision Research

Volumn 87, Issue , 2013, Pages 46-52

  Schutz I ^a   Henriques, D Y P ^b   Fiehler, K ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Delayed reaching; Landmarks; Reaching; Reference frame; Spatial coding; Spatial updating

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879591855     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ball K., Smith D., Ellison A., Schenk T. Both egocentric and allocentric cues support spatial priming in visual search. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1585-1591.
2. Ball K., Smith D., Ellison A., Schenk T. A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:585-594.
3. Bradshaw M.F., Watt S.J. A dissociation of perception and action in normal human observers: The effect of temporal-delay. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:1766-1778.
4. Byrne P.A., Cappadocia D.C., Crawford J.D. Interactions between gaze-centered and allocentric representations of reach target location in the presence of spatial updating. Vision Research 2010, 50:2661-2670.
5. Byrne P.A., Crawford J.D. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 103:3054-3069.
6. Byrne P.A., Henriques D.Y.P. When more is less: Increasing allocentric visual information can switch visual-proprioceptive combination from an optimal to sub-optimal process. Neuropsychologia 2012.
7. Chapman C.S., Goodale M.A. Missing in action: The effect of obstacle position and size on avoidance while reaching. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 191:83-97.
8. Chapman C.S., Goodale M.A. Seeing all the obstacles in your way: The effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202:363-375.
9. Chen Y., Byrne P., Crawford J.D. Time course of allocentric decay, egocentric decay, and allocentric-to-egocentric conversion in memory-guided reach. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:49-60.
10. Crawford J.D., Henriques D.Y.P., Medendorp W.P. Three-dimensional transformations for goal-directed action. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2011, 34:309-331.
11. de Grave D.D.J., Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Illusions as a tool to study the coding of pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 2004, 155:56-62.
12. Fiehler K., Schütz I., Henriques D.Y.P. Gaze-centered spatial updating of reach targets across different memory delays. Vision Research 2011, 51:890-897.
13. Franz V.H., Hesse C., Kollath S. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: No shift from dorsal to ventral control. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1518-1531.
14. Hay L., Redon C. Response delay and spatial representation in pointing movements. Neuroscience Letters 2006, 408:194-198.
15. Henriques D.Y.P., Klier E.M., Smith M.A., Lowy D., Crawford J.D. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18:1583-1594.
16. Hesse C., Franz V.H. Memory mechanisms in grasping. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1532-1545.
17. Hesse C., Franz V.H. Grasping remembered objects: Exponential decay of the visual memory. Vision Research 2010, 50:2642-2650.
18. Himmelbach M., Nau M., Zündorf I., Erb M., Perenin M.-T., Karnath H.-O. Brain activation during immediate and delayed reaching in optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1508-1517.
19. Hu Y., Goodale M.A. Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:856-868.
20. Krigolson O., Clark N., Heath M., Binsted G. The proximity of visual landmarks impacts reaching performance. Spatial Vision 2007, 20:317-336.
21. Krigolson O., Heath M. Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching. Human Movement Science 2004, 23:861-877.
22. Lemay M., Bertram C.P., Stelmach G.E. Pointing to an allocentric and egocentric remembered target. Motor Control 2004, 8:16-32.
23. McGuire L.M.M., Sabes P.N. Sensory transformations and the use of multiple reference frames for reach planning. Nature Neuroscience 2009, 12:1056-1061.
24. McIntosh R.D., McClements K.I., Schindler I., Cassidy T.P., Birchall D., Milner A.D. Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 2004, 271:15-20.
25. Medendorp W.P., Crawford J.D. Visuospatial updating of reaching targets in near and far space. Neuroreport 2002, 13:633-636.
26. Neggers S.F.W., Schölvinck M.L., van der Lubbe R.H.J., Postma A. Quantifying the interactions between allo- and egocentric representations of space. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam) 2005, 118:25-45.
27. Obhi S.S., Goodale M.A. The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 167:335-344.
28. Sheth B.R., Shimojo S. Extrinsic cues suppress the encoding of intrinsic cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:339-350.
29. Sorrento G.U., Henriques D.Y.P. Reference frame conversions for repeated arm movements. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 99:2968-2984.
30. Thompson A.A., Henriques D.Y.P. Updating visual memory across eye movements for ocular and arm motor control. Journal of Neurophysiology 2008, 100:2507-2514.
31. Tresilian J.R. Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension. Experimental Brain Research 1998, 120:352-368.
32. van Zoest W., Hunt A.R. Saccadic eye movements and perceptual judgments reveal a shared visual representation that is increasingly accurate over time. Vision Research 2011, 51:111-119.
33. Westwood D.A., Goodale M.A. Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:243-254.
34. Westwood D.A., Heath M., Roy E.A. The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Experimental Brain Research 2000, 134:456-463.
35. Westwood D.A., Heath M., Roy E.A. No evidence for accurate visuomotor memory: Systematic and variable error in memory-guided reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior 2003, 35:127-133.