Model selection in mixture regression analysis - A Monte Carlo simulation study

Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 61-68

  Sarstedt, Marko ^a   Schwaiger, Manfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MACHINE LEARNING; MIXTURES; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

INFORMATION CRITERION; MIXTURE PROPORTIONS; MIXTURE REGRESSION; MODEL SELECTION; RELATIVE PERFORMANCE; SAMPLE SIZES; STATISTICAL PACKAGES; THEORY AND PRACTICE;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84879572944     PISSN: 14318814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. AITKIN, M., RUBIN, D.B. (1985): Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Finite Mixture Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 47 (1), 67-75.
2. AKAIKE, H. (1973): Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. In B. N. Petrov; F. Csaki (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (267-281). Budapest: Springer.
3. ANDREWS, R., ANSARI, A., CURRIM, I. (2002): Hierarchical Bayes Versus Finite Mixture Conjoint Analysis Models: A Comparison of Fit, Prediction and Pathworth Recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 39 (1), 87-98.
4. ANDREWS, R., CURRIM, I. (2003a): A Comparison of Segment Retention Criteria for Finite Mixture Logit Models. Journal of Marketing Research, 40 (3), 235-243.
5. ANDREWS, R., CURRIM, I. (2003b): Retention of Latent Segments in Regression-based Marketing Models. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20 (4), 315-321.
6. BOZDOGAN, H. (1987): Model Selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The General Theory and its Analytical Extensions. Psychometrika, 52 (3), 346-370.
7. BOZDOGAN, H. (1994): Mixture-model Cluster Analysis using Model Selection Criteria and a new Information Measure of Complexity. Proceedings of the First US/Japan Conference on Frontiers of Statistical Modelling: An Informational Approach, Vol. 2 (69-113).Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
8. DEMPSTER, A. P., LAIRD, N. M., RUBIN, D. B. (1977): Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM-Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 39 (1), 1-39.
9. DESARBO, W. S., DEGERATU, A., WEDEL, M., SAXTON, M. (2001): The Spatial Representation of Market Information. Marketing Science, 20 (4), 426-441.
10. GRÜN, B., LEISCH, F. (2006): Fitting Mixtures of Generalized Linear Regressions in R. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, in press.
11. HAHN, C., JOHNSON, M. D., HERRMANN, A., HUBER, F. (2002): Capturing Customer Heterogeneity using a Finite Mixture PLS Approach. Schmalenbach Business Review, 54 (3), 243-269.
12. HAWKINS, D. S., ALLEN, D. M., STROMBERG, A. J. (2001): Determining the Number of Components in Mixtures of Linear Models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 38 (1), 15-48.
13. JEDIDI, K., JAGPAL, H. S., DESARBO, W. S. (1979): Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16 (1), 39-59.
14. LEISCH, F. (2004): FlexMix: A General Framework for Finite Mixture Models and Latent Class Regresion in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 11 (8), 1-18.
15. MANTRALA, M. K., SEETHARAMAN, P. B., KAUL, R., GOPALAKRISHNA, S., STAM, A. (2006): Optimal Pricing Strategies for an Automotive Aftermarket Retailer. Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (4), 588-604.
16. MCLACHLAN, G. J., PEEL, D. (2000): Finite Mixture Models, New York: Wiley.
17. MORRISON, D. G. (1969): On the Interpretation of Discriminant Analysis, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6, 156-163.
18. OLIVEIRA-BROCHADO, A., MARTINS, F. V. (2006): Examining the Segment Retention Problem for the "Group Satellite" Case. FEP Working Papers, 220. www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.07.04-WP220-brochadomartins .pdf
19. RISSANEN, J. (1978): Modelling by Shortest Data Description. Automatica, 14, 465-471.
20. SARSTEDT, M. (2006): Sample- and Segment-size specific Model Selection in Mixture Regression Analysis. Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge, 08-2006. Available electronically from http://epub.ub.uni- muenchen.de/archive/00001252/01/2006-08-LMU-sarstedt.pdf
21. SCHWARZ, G. (1978): Estimating the Dimensions of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461-464.
22. WEDEL, M., KAMAKURA, W. A. (1999): Market Segmentation. Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd ed.), Boston, Dordrecht & London: Kluwer.