Local site effects on a high-pier railway bridge under tridirectional spatial excitations: Nonstationary stochastic analysis

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 52, Issue , 2013, Pages 55-69

  Jia, Hong Yu ^a   Zhang, De Yi ^b   Zheng, Shi Xiong ^a   Xie, Wei Chau ^b   Pandey, Mahesh D ^b  

^a SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

High pier railway bridge; Local site effect; Nonstationary stochastic vibration analysis; Pseudo excitation method; Spatially varying ground motions; Tridirectional ground motions

Indexed keywords

GROUND MOTIONS; LOCAL SITES; PSEUDO EXCITATION METHODS; RAILWAY BRIDGES; SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTION; STOCHASTIC VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

PIERS; RAILROAD BRIDGES; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

BRIDGE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAILWAY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SITE EFFECT; STOCHASTICITY; VIBRATION;

EID: 84879541552     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Wang M, Gan K. The railway of the 21st century 2011, Tsinghua University Press, (In Chinese).
2. Ma B. Continuous rigid frame bridge with high pier and large span 2001, People's Transportation Press, (In Chinese).
3. Li Q, Zhao S. Wenchuan earthquake engineering damage analysis 2008, Southwest Jiaotong University Press, (In Chinese).
4. Cheng C-T, Yang J-C, Yeh Y-K, Chen S-E. Seismic performance of repaired hollow-bridge piers. Construction and Building Materials 2003, 17(5):339-351.
5. Wang Z. A preliminary report on the great Wenchuan earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2008, 7(2):22534.
6. MRC. Code for seismic design of railway engineering: GB 50111-2006. Ministry of Railways of China: Beijing; 2006.
7. Caglayan O, Ozakgul K, Tezer O, Uzgider E. Evaluation of a steel railway bridge for dynamic and seismic loads. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2011, 67(8):1198-1211.
8. Liang ZY. Study on seismic design theory of irregular girder bridge with high piers 2007, Department of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, [Ph.D. dissertation].
9. Zerva A. Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: modeling and engineering applications 2009, Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press.
10. CEN. Eurocode 8: Design provisions of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Building, EN 1998-1:2004. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels; 2004.
11. CEN. Eurocode 8: Design Provisions of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 2: Bridges, EN1998-2:2005. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels; 2005.
12. National Standard of the People's Republic of China Code for seismic design of buildings, GB 50011-2010 2010, Chinese Architectural Industry Press, Beijing.
13. Ministry of Communications of the People's Republic of China Guidelines for seismic design of highway bridges, JTG/T B02-01-2008 2008, China Communications Press, Beijing.
14. Harichandran RS, Hawwari A, Sweidan BN. Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion. Journal of Structural Engineering 1996, 122(5):476-484.
15. Wang J, Hu S, Wei X. Effects of engineering geological condition on response of suspension bridges. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1999, 18(4):297-304.
16. Yau JD, Fryba L. Response of suspended beams due to moving loads and vertical seismic ground excitations. Engineering Structures 2007, 29(12):3255-3262.
17. Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM. Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992, 21(1):1-20.
18. Kahan M, Gibert RJ, Bard PY. Influence of seismic waves spatial variability on bridges: a sensitivity analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996, 25(8):795-814.
19. Dumanogluid AA, Soyluk K. A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions including the site-response effect. Engineering Structures 2003, 25(10):1301-1310.
20. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: theory and application to earthquake engineering 2007, Prentice Hall Press. 3rd edition.
21. Soyluk K. Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges. Engineering Structures 2004, 26(11):1573-1583.
22. Soyluk K, Dumanoglu AA, Tuna ME. Random vibration and deterministic analyses of cable stayed bridges to asynchronous ground motion. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2004, 18(2):231-246.
23. Hao H. Stability of simple beam subjected to multiple seismic excitations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1997, 123(7):739-742.
24. Hao H. A parametric study of the required seating length for bridge decks during earthquake. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998, 27(1):91-103.
25. Jankowski R, Wilde K, Fujino Y. Reduction of pounding effects in elevated bridges during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000, 29(2):195-212.
26. Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002, 31(6):1325-1345.
27. Chouw N, Hao H, Su H. Multi-sided pounding response of bridge structures with non-linear bearings to spatially varying ground excitation. Advances in Structural Engineering 2006, 9(1):55-66.
28. Bi K M, Hao H, Chouw N. Required separation distance between decks and at abutments of a bridge crossing a canyon site to avoid seismic pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010, 39(3):303-323.
29. Ates S, Dumanoglu AA, Bayraktar A. Stochastic response of seismically isolated highway bridges with friction pendulum systems to spatially varying earthquake ground motions. Engineering Structures 2005, 27(13):1843-1858.
30. Du XT, Xu YL, Xia H. Dynamic interaction of bridge--train system under non-uniform seismic ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012, 41(1):139-157.
31. Xia H, Han Y, Zhang N, Guo W. Dynamic analysis of train-bridge system subjected to non-uniform seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006, 35(12):1563-1579.
32. Li B, Bi K, Chouw N, Butterworth JW, Hao H. Experimental investigation of spatially varying effect of ground motions on bridge pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2012, 41(14):1959-1976.
33. Chouw N, Hao H. Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: effect on response with conventional expansion joint. Engineering Structures 2008, 30(1):141-153.
34. Soyluk K, Sicacik EA. Soil-structure interaction analysis of cable-stayed bridges for spatially varying ground motion components. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2011, 35:80-90.
35. Ates S, Bayraktar A, Dumanoglu AA. The effect of spatially varying earthquake ground motions on the stochastic response of bridges isolated with friction pendulum systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26(1):31-44.
36. Zhang D-Y, Li X, Yan W-M, Xie W-C, Pandey MD. Stochastic seismic analysis of a Concrete-filled Steel Tubular (CFST) arch bridge under tridirectional multiple excitations. Engineering Structures 2013, 52:355-371.
37. Zhang D-Y, Xie W-C, Pandey MD. Synthesis of spatially correlated ground motions at varying sites based on vector-valued seismic hazard deaggregation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2012, 41:1-13.
38. Housner GW. Characteristics of strong-motion earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1947, 37(1):19-31.
39. Lin JH, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. Accurate and highly efficient algorithms for structural stationary/non-stationary random responses. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001, 191(1):103-111.
40. Perotti F. Structural response to non-stationary multiple-support random excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990, 19(4):513-527.
41. Hyun CH, Yun CB, Lee DG. Nonstationary response analysis of suspension bridges for multiple support excitations. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1992, 7(1):27-35.
42. Ates S. Seismic behaviour of isolated multi-span continuous bridge to nonstationary random seismic excitation. Nonlinear Dynamics 2012, 67(1):263-282.
43. Lin J H, Li J, Zhang W, Williams FW. Random seismic responses of multi-supported structures in evolutionary inhomogeneous random fields. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997, 26(1):135-145.
44. Smeby W, Der Kiureghian A. Modal combination rules for multi-component earthquake excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1985, 13(1):1-12.
45. Kohnke P. ANSYS theory reference-release 13.0 2010, ANSYS Inc.
46. Clough R W, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures 1975, McGraw-Hill.
47. Cao Z, Xue S. Seismic analysis and design of spatial structures 2006, Science Press, Beijing.
48. Lin JH, Zhang Y, Zhao Y. Seismic spatial effects on dynamic response of long-span bridges in stationary inhomogeneous random fields. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2004, 3(2):171-180.
49. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A. Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992, 21(8):713-740.
50. Jennings P., Housner G., Tsai N. Simulated earthquake motions. technical report, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; 1968.
51. Caughey T.K., Stumpf H.J. Transient response of a dynamic system under random vibration. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1961, 28:563-566.