Dynamic interaction of bridge-train system under non-uniform seismic ground motion

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 139-157

  Du, X T ^a,b   Xu, Y L ^b   Xia, H ^a  

^a BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Bridge; Displacement seismic ground motion; Dynamic interaction; Non uniform; Trains; Wheel rail separation

Indexed keywords

ARCH BRIDGES; BRIDGES; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; RAILROADS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEPARATION; VEHICLES; WHEELS;

DYNAMIC INTERACTION; NON-UNIFORM; SEISMIC GROUND MOTIONS; TRAINS; WHEEL-RAIL;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

BRIDGE; DISPLACEMENT; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; PROBABILITY; RAILWAY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMICITY; SPATIAL VARIATION; TRAIN;

EID: 84155165094     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1122     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Yang YB, Wu YS. Dynamic stability of trains moving over bridges shaken by earthquakes. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2002; 258(1):65-94. DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.2002.5089.
2. Kim CW, Kawatani M. Effect of train dynamics on seismic response of steel monorail bridges under moderate ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:1225-1245. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.580.
3. Nazmy AS, Abdel-Ghaffar AM. Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:1-20. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210101.
4. Alexander NA. Multi-support excitation of single span bridges, using real seismic ground motion recorded at the SMART-1 array. Computers and Structures 2008; 86:88-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.035.
5. Xia H, Han Y, Zhang N, Guo W. Dynamic analysis of train-bridge system subjected to non-uniform seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:1563-1579. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.594.
6. Yau JD, Fryba L. Response of suspended beams due to moving loads and vertical seismic ground excitations. Engineering Structures 2007; 29:3255-3262. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.001.
7. Fryba L, Yau JD. Suspended bridges subjected to moving loads and support motions due to earthquake. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2009; 319:218-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.05.012.
8. Yau JD. Dynamic response analysis of suspended beams subjected to moving vehicles and multiple support excitations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2009; 325:907-922. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.013.
9. Deodatis G. Non-stationary stochastic vector process: seismic ground motion applications. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1996; 11:149-168. DOI: 10.1016/0266-8920(96)00007-0.
10. Wilson EL. Three-dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures: A Physical Approach with Emphasis on Earthquake Engineering, Chapter 22. Computers and Structures Inc: California, 2002.
11. Tsai HC. Modal superposition method for dynamic analysis of structures excited by prescribed support displacements. Computers & Structures 1998; 66(5):675-683.
12. Li Q, Xu YL, Xu DJ, Chen ZW. Computer-aided nonlinear vehicle-bridge interaction analysis. Journal of Vibration and Control 2010; 1-26. DOI: 10.1177/1077546309341603.
13. Chen G, Zhai WM. A new wheel/rail spatially dynamic coupling model and its verification. Vehicle System Dynamics 2004; 41(4):301-332. DOI: 10.1080/00423110412331315178.
14. Zhai WM. Vehicle-track Coupling Dynamics. Science Press: Beijing, 2007.
15. Xu YL, Zhang N, Xia H. Vibration of coupled train and cable-stayed bridge systems in cross winds. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:1389-14061. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.005.
16. Zerva A. Spatial Variation of Seismic Ground Motions: Modeling and Engineering Applications. Taylor & Francis Group LLC: Boca Raton, 2009.
17. Rezaeian SS, Kiureghian AD. Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2010; 39(10):1155-1180. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.997.
18. Luco J, Wong H. Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1986; 14:99-111.