Soil-structure interaction analysis of cable-stayed bridges for spatially varying ground motion components

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue , 2012, Pages 80-90

  Soyluk, Kurtulus ^a   Sicacik, Eda Avanoglu ^b  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b KIRIKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE MODEL; BRIDGE RESPONSE; DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS; FIXED BASE; GROUND MOTIONS; PARAMETRIC STUDY; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; SITE-RESPONSE EFFECT; SOIL STRUCTURE SYSTEM; SOIL SYSTEMS; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; SPATIALLY VARYING GROUND MOTION; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS; SUBSTRUCTURE METHOD; TIME HISTORY;

BOX GIRDER BRIDGES; CABLE STAYED BRIDGES; CABLES; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; SOILS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

BRIDGE; CABLE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84855211607     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Zerva A. Effect of spatial variability and propagation of seismic ground motions on the response of multiply supported structures. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1991, 6:212-221.
2. Nazmy A.S., Abdel-Ghaffar A.M. Effects of ground motion spatial variability on the response of cable-stayed bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992, 21:1-20.
3. Nakamura Y, Der Kiureghian A, Liu D. Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the Golden Gate Bridge. Report no. UCB/EERC-93/05, Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California; 1993.
4. Harichandran R.S., Hawwari A., Sweiden B.N. Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion. Journal of Structural Engineering 1996, 122(5):476-484.
5. Der Kiureghian A, Keshishian P, Hakobian A. Multiple support response spectrum analysis of bridges including the site-response effect and MSRS code. Report no. UCB/EERC-97/02. Berkeley (CA): Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California; 1997.
6. Zembaty Z., Rutenberg A. On the sensivity of bridge seismic response with local soil amplification. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998, 27(10):1095-1099.
7. Allam S.M., Datta T.K. Seismic behaviour of cable-stayed bridges under multi-component random ground motion. Engineering Structures 1999, 22:62-74.
8. Zanardo G., Hao H., Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002, 31:1325-1345.
9. Dumanoglu A., Soyluk K. A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions including the site-response effect. Engineering Structures 2003, 25:1301-1310.
10. Li J.H., Li J. A response spectrum method for seismic response analysis of structures under multi-support excitations. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2005, 21(3):255-273.
11. Ates S., Bayraktar A., Dumanoglu A.A. The effect of spatially varying earthquake ground motions on the stochastic response of bridges isolated with friction pendulum systems. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26:31-44.
12. Wang J., Carr A.J., Cooke N., Moss P.J. The response of a 344 m long bridge to non-uniform earthquake ground motions. Engineering Structures 2009, 31(11):2554-2567.
13. Zhang Y.H., Li Q.S., Lin J.H., Williams F.W. Random vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29(4):620-629.
14. Bai F.L., Hao H., Li H.N. Seismic response of a steel trussed arch structure to spatially varying earthquake ground motions including site effect. Advances in Structural Engineering 2010, 13(6):1089-1103.
15. Bi K.M., Hao H., Ren W.X. Response of a frame structure on a canyon site to spatially varying ground motions. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 2010, 36(1):111-127.
16. Mezouer N., Silhadi K., Hadid M. Sensitivity analysis of site response effect on stochastic responses of two-span beam. Advances in Structural Engineering 2011, 14(3):405-417.
17. Hao H, Bolt BA, Penzien J. Effects of spatial variation of ground motions on large multiply-supported structures. Report no: UCB/EERC-89/06. Berkeley, California, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California; 1989.
18. Betti R., Abdel-Ghaffar A.M., Niazy A.S. Kinematic soil-structure interaction for long-span cable-supported bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993, 22:415-430.
19. Shrikhande M., Gupta V.K. Dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic response of suspension bridges. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1999, 28(11):1383-1403.
20. Sextos A.G., Pitilakis K.D., Kappos A.J. Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground Motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: methodology and analytical tools. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003, 32:607-627.
21. Sextos A.G., Pitilakis K.D., Kappos A.J. Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: parametric study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003, 32:629-652.
22. Chouw N., Hao H. Study of SSI and non-uniform ground motion effect on pounding between bridge girders. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005, 25:717-728.
23. Chouw N., Hao H. Significance of SSI and nonuniform near-fault ground motions in bridge response I: Effect on response with conventional expansion Joint. Engineering Structures 2008, 30:141-153.
24. Allam A.M. Multiple-support excitations of open-plane frames by a filtered white-noise and soil-structure interaction. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2010, 329:4212-4226.
25. Bi K., Hao H., Chouw N. Influence of ground motion spatial variation, site condition and SSI on the required separation distances of bridge structures to avoid seismic pounding. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2011, 40:1027-1043.
26. Wong HL, Luco JE. Tables of impedance functions and input motions for rectangular foundations. Report no: CE 78-15. Los Angeles, California: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California; 1978.
27. Clough R.W., Penzien J. Dynamics of structures 1993, McGraw Hill Inc., Singapore.
28. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A. A response spectrum method for multiple-support seismic excitations. Report no: UCB/EERC-91/08. Berkeley, California, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California; 1991.
29. Der Kiureghian A. A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996, 25:99-111.
30. Harichandran R.S., Vanmarcke EH Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 1986, 112(2):154-174.
31. Jennings PC, Housner GW, Tsai NC. Simulated earthquake motions. Report no: EERL-02. California, USA: Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; 1968.
32. Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Brussels; 2004.
33. Scanlan R.H., Sachs K. Earthquake time histories and response spectra. Journal of engineering Mechanics ASCE 1974, 100(4):635-655.
34. Chiu H.C. Stable baseline correction of digital strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1997, 87(4):932-944.