Effects of global climate changes on geographical distribution patterns of economically important plant species in Cerrado;Efeitos das mudanças climáticas globais sobre os padrões de distribuição geográfica das espécies de plantas economicamente importantes no Cerrado

Revista Arvore

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 267-274

  Simon, Lorena Mendes ^a   de Oliveira, Guilherme ^a   de Souza Barreto, Bruno ^a   Nabout, João Carlos ^b   Rangel, Thiago Fernando Lopes Valle Britto ^a   Diniz Filho, José Alexandre Felizola ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE GOIÁS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bioclimatic envelope; Ensemble forecasting; Modeling uncertainty; Species distribution models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879487238     PISSN: 01006762     EISSN: 18069088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-67622013000200008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ACKERLY, D. D. et al. The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions, v.16, n.3, p.476-487, 2010.
2. ALLOUCHE, O.; TSOAR, A.; KADMON, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, v.43, n.6, p.1223-1232, 2006.
3. ALMEIDA, S. P. et al. Cerrado: espécies vegetais úteis. Planaltina: Embrapa-CPAC, 1998. p.156-161.
4. ARAÚJO, M. B.; GUISAN, A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography, v.33, n.10, p.1677-1688, 2006.
5. ARAÚJO, M. B.; NEW, M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, v.22, n.1, p.42-47, 2007.
6. ARAÚJO, M. B. et al. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biology, v.11, n.9, p.1504-1513, 2005a.
7. ARAÚJO, M. B. et al. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v.14, n.6, p.529-538, 2005b.
8. BEAUMONT, L. J. et al. Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions. Global Change Biology, v.13, n.7, p.1368-1385, 2007.
9. BOTKIN, D. B. et al. Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity. Bioscience, v.57, n.3, p.227-236, 2007.
10. BUSBY, J. R. BIOCLIM: a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. In: MARGULES, C. R.; AUSTIN, M. P. (Ed.) Conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis) Melbourne, CSIRO, 1991. p.64-68.
11. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. The three phases of the ensemble forecasting of niche models: geographic range and shifts in climatically suitable areas of Utetheisa ornatrix (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, v.54, n.3, p.339-349, 2010a.
12. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. Ensemble forecasting shifts in climatically suitable areas for Tropidacris cristata (Orthoptera: Acridoidea: Romaleidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity, v.3, p.213-221, 2010b.
13. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography, v.32, n.6, p.897-906, 2009a.
14. Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. Biogeografia da conservação e mudanças climáticas no cerrado brasileiro. Natureza Conservação, v.7, n.1, p.8-18, 2009b.
15. ELITH, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, v.29, n.2, p.129-151, 2006.
16. ELITH, J.; GRAHAM, C. H. Do they? How do they? Why do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography, v.32, n.2, p.66-77, 2009.
17. FARBER, O.; KADMON, R. Assessment of alternative approaches for bioclimatic modeling with special emphasis on the Mahalanobis distance. Ecological Modeling, v.160, n.1/2, p.115-130, 2003.
18. GOWER, J. C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, v.27, n.4, p.857-871, 1971.
19. HIJMANS, R. J.; GRAHAM, C. H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biology, v.12, p.2272-2281, 2006.
20. KARL, T. R.; TRENBERTH, K. E. What is climate change? In: LOVEJOY, J.E.; HANNAH, L.J., (Ed.) Climate change and biodiversity New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005. p.15-30.
21. KERR, J. T.; KHAROUBA, H. M.; CURRIE, D. J. The macroecological contribution to global change solutions. Science, v.316, p.1581-1584, 2007.
22. KLINK, C. A.; MACHADO, R. B. A conservação do cerrado brasileiro. Megadiversidade, v. 1, n. 1, p.148-155, 2005.
23. LAWLER, J. J. et al. Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology, v.90, n.3, p.588-597, 2009.
24. MARINI, M. A. et al. predicted climate-driven bird distribution changes and forecasted conservation conûicts in a neotropical savanna. Conservation Biology, v.23, p.1558-1567, 2009.
25. MARMION, M. et al. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modeling. Diversity and Distributions, v.15, n.1, p.59-69, 2009.
26. MCCARTHY, J. J. et al. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
27. MYERS, N. et al. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, v.403, p.853-858, 2000.
28. NABOUT J. C. et al. Global climate change and the production of "Pequi" Fruits (Caryocar brasiliense) in the Brazilian Cerrado. Natureza & Conservação, v.9, n.1, p.1-5, 2011.
29. OLIVEIRA, P. S.; MARQUIS, R. J. The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002. p.329-347.
30. PARMESAN, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, v.37, p.637-690, 2006.
31. PEARCE, J. L.; BOYCE, M. S. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. Journal of Applied Ecology, v.43, n.3, p.405-412, 2005.
32. PEARSON, R. G.; DAWSON, T. P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology & Biogeography, v.12, n.5, p.361-371, 2003.
33. PHILLIPS, S. J.; ANDERSON, R. P.; SCHAPIRE, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, v.190, n.3/4, p.231-259, 2006.
34. RANGEL, T. F. L. V. B.; Diniz-Filho, J. A. F.; ARAÚJO, M. B. Bioensembles - Software for computer intensive ensemble forecasting of species distributions under climate change.Goias, Madrid: Evora, 2009.
35. RONDININI, C. et al. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecology Letters, v.9, n.2, p.1136-1145, 2006.
36. SIQUEIRA, M. F.; DURIGAN, G Modelagem da distribuição geográfica de espécies lenhosas de cerrado no Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Botânica, v.30, n.2, p.233-243, 2007.
37. STOCKWELL, D. R. B.; NOBLE, I. R. Induction of sets of rules from animal distribution data: A robust and informative method of data analysis. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, v.33, NUMERO, p.385-390, 1992.
38. THUILLER, W. Biodiversity - Climate change and the ecologist. Nature, v.448, p.550-552, 2007.
39. THUILLER, W. et al. Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature, v.470, p.531-534, 2011.
40. THUILLER, W. et al. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. PNAS, v.102, n.23, p.8245-8250, 2005.