Multiscale full waveform inversion

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 194, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 534-556

  Fichtner, Andreas ^a   Trampert, Jeannot ^b   Cupillard, Paul ^c   Saygin, Erdinc ^d   Taymaz, Tuncay ^e   Capdeville, Yann ^f   Villaseñor, Antonio ^g  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^f UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^g INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCES JAUME ALMERA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computational seismology; Inverse theory; Seismic anisotropy; Seismic tomography; Theoretical seismology; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL SEISMOLOGIES; INVERSE THEORY; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; THEORETICAL SEISMOLOGIES;

ITERATIVE METHODS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOGRAPHS; SEISMOLOGY; WAVE PROPAGATION;

WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

INVERSION LAYER; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SEISMIC ATTENUATION; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; WAVE PROPAGATION; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

ARMORICAN MASSIF; BRETAGNE; FRANCE; MASSIF CENTRAL; RHINE GRABEN;

EID: 84879479490     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggt118     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Aki, K., 1980a.Attenuation of shear-waves in the lithosphere for frequencies from 0.05 to 25 Hz, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 21, 50-60.
2. Aki, K., 1980b. Scattering and attenuation of shear waves in the lithosphere, J. geophys. Res., 85, 6496-6504.
3. Aki, K., & Lee, W.H.K., 1976. Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earthquakes-1. A homogeneous initial model, J. geophys. Res., 81, 4381-4399.
4. Backus, G.E., 1962. Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by horizontal layering, J. geophys. Res., 67, 4427-4440.
5. Backus, G.E., & Gilbert, F., 1967. Numerical application of a formalism for geophysical inverse problems, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 13, 247-276.
6. Backus, G.E., & Gilbert, F., 1968. The resolving power of gross Earth data, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 16, 169-205.
7. Backus, G.E., & Gilbert, F., 1970. Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross Earth data, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A., 266, 123-192.
8. Bakirci, T., Yoshizawa, K., & Özer, M.F., 2012. Three-dimensional S wave structure of the upper mantle beneath Turkey from surface wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1058-1076.
9. Bamberger, A., Chavent, G., Hemons, C., & Lailly, P., 1982. Inversion of normal incidence seismograms, Geophysics, 47, 757-770.
10. Bassin, C., Laske, G., & Masters, G., 2000. The current limits of resolution for surfacewave tomography in NorthAmerica, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 81, F897.
11. Bijwaard, H., Spakman,W., & Engdahl, E.R., 1998. Closing the gap between regional and global traveltime tomography, J. geophys. Res., 103, 30 055- 30 078.
12. Biryol, C.B., Beck, S., Zandt, G., & Ozacar, A.A., 2011. Segmented African lithosphere beneath theAnatolian region inferred from teleseismic P-wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 184, 1037-1057.
13. Bozdaǧ E., & Trampert, J., 2008. On crustal corrections in surface wave tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 1066-1082.
14. Bozdaǧ, E., Trampert, J., & Tromp, J., 2011. Misfit functions for full waveforminversion based on instantaneous phase and envelope measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 845-870.
15. Brossier R., Operto, S., & Virieux, J., 2010. Which data residual norm for robust elastic frequency-domain full waveform inversion? Geophysics, 75, R37-R46.
16. Bunks, C., Saleck, F.M., Zaleski, S.&Chavent, G., 1995. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion, Geophysics, 60, 1457-1473.
17. Cammarano, F., Goes, S., Vacher, P., & Giardini, D., 2003. Inferring uppermantle temperatures from seismic velocities, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 138, 197-222.
18. Canas, J.A., & Mitchell, B.J., 1978. Lateral variations of surface wave attenuation across the Pacific, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 68, 1637-1650.
19. Capdeville, Y., Guillot, L., & Marigo, J.J., 2010a. 1-D nonperiodic homogenization for the wave equation, Geophys. J. Int., 181, 897-910.
20. Capdeville, Y., Guillot, L., & Marigo, J.J., 2010b. 2-D nonperiodic homogenization to upscale elastic media for P-SV waves, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 903-922.
21. Capdeville, Y., Stutzmann, E., Montagner, J.-P., & Wang, N., 2013. residual homogenization for seismic forward and inverse problems in layered media, Geophys. J. Int., in press, doi:10.1093/gji/ggt102.
22. Chen, P., 2011. Full-wave seismic data assimilation: theoretical background and recent advances, Geophys. J. Int., 168, 1527-1552.
23. Chen, P., Zhao, L., & Jordan, T.H., 2007. Full 3D tomography for the crustal structure of the Los Angeles region, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 97, 1094-1120.
24. Crase, E., Pica, A., Noble, M., McDonald, J., & Tarantola, A., 1990. Robust elastic nonlinear waveform inversion-application to real data, Geophysics, 55, 527-538.
25. Cupillard, P., & Capdeville, Y., 2010. On the amplitudes of surface waves obtained by noise correlation and the capability to recover the attenuation: a numerical approach, Geophys. J. Int., 181, 1687-1700.
26. Cupillard P.,Delavaud, E., Burgos, G., Festa, G.,Vilotte, J.-P., Capdeville,Y., &Montagner, J.-P., 2012. RegSEM: a versatile code based on the spectral element method to compute seismic wave propagation at the regional scale, Geophys. J. Int., 188, 1203-1220.
27. Dahlen, F., Hung, S.-H., & Nolet, G., 2000. Fréchet kernels for finitefrequency traveltimes-I. Theory, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 157-174.
28. Dalton, C.A., Ekström, G., & Dziewonski, A.M., 2008. The global attenuation structure of the upper mantle, J. geophys. Res., 113, doi:10.1029/2007JB005429.
29. Danecek, P., Stich, D., & Morelli, A., 2011. Images of the Iberian lithosphere from one local earthquake, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 101, 881-887.
30. Davies, G.F., 1999. Dynamic Earth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Debayle, E., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2000. Anisotropy in the Australasian upper mantle from Love and Rayleigh waveform inversion, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 184, 339-351.
31. Deuss, A., 2008. Normal-mode constraints on shear and compressionalwave velocity of the Earth's inner core, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 268, 364-375.
32. Díaz, J. et al., 2009. The IBERARRAY broadband seismic network: a new tool to investigate the deep structure beneath Iberia, ORFEUS Newsl., 8, 1-6.
33. Dumbser, M., Käser,M., & de la Puente, J., 2007. Arbitrary high order finite volume schemes for seismic wave propagation on unstructured meshes in 2D and 3D, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 665-694.
34. Dumbser, M., Käser, M., & Toro, E., 2007. An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes, Part V: local time stepping and p-adaptivity, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 695- 717. Durek, J.J., & Ekström, G., 1996. A radial model of an elasticity consistent with long-period surface wave attenuation, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 86, 144-158.
35. Dziewoński, A.M., & Anderson, D.L., 1981. Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 25, 297-356.
36. Ferreira, A.M.G., Woodhouse, J.H., Visser, K., & Trampert, J., 2010. On the robustness of global radially anisotropic surface wave tomography, J. geophys. Res., 115, doi:1029/2009JB006716.
37. Fichtner, A., & Igel, H., 2008. Efficient numerical surface wave propagation through the optimization of discrete crustal models-a technique based on non-linear dispersion curve matching (DCM), Geophys. J. Int., 173, 519-533.
38. Fichtner, A., & Tkalcic, H., 2010. Insights into the kinematics of a volcanic caldera drop: probabilistic finite-source inversion of the 1996 Bardarbunga, Iceland, earthquake, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 297, 607- 615.
39. Fichtner, A., & Trampert, J., 2011a. Hessian kernels of seismic data functionals based upon adjoint techniques, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 775- 798.
40. Fichtner A. & Trampert, J., 2011b. Resolution analysis in full waveform inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1604-1624.
41. Fichtner, A., Bunge, H.-P., & Igel, H., 2006. The adjoint method in seismology-I. Theory, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 157, 86-104.
42. Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., & Trampert, J., 2012. Separating intrinsic and apparent anisotropy, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2013.03.006.
43. Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H., & Bunge, H.-P., 2008. Theoretical background for continental- and global-scale full-waveform inversion in the time-frequency domain, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 665-685.
44. Fichtner, A., Kennett, B.L.N., Igel, H., & Bunge, H.-P., 2010. Full waveform tomography for radially anisotropic structure: new insight into present and past states of the Australasian upper mantle, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 290, 270-280.
45. Fichtner, A., Saygin, E., Taymaz, T.,Cupillard, P.,Capdeville,Y.&Trampert, J., 2013. The deep structure of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., in press.
46. Fishwick, S., Kennett, B.L.N., & Reading, A.M., 2005. Contrasts in lithospheric structure within the Australian Craton, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 231, 163-176.
47. Flanagan, M.P., & Wiens, D.A., 1998. Attenuation of broadband P and S waves in Tonga, Pure. appl. Geophys., 153, 345-375.
48. Frankel, A., 1989. A review of numerical experiments on seismic wave scattering, Pure appl. Geophys., 4, 639-685.
49. Furumura, T., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2005. Subduction zone guided waves and the heterogeneity structure of the subducted plate-intensity anomalies in northern Japan, J. geophys. Res., 110, doi:10.129/2004JB003486.
50. Giardini, D., Li, X.-D., & Woodhouse, J.H., 1987. Three-dimensional structure of the Earth from splitting in free-oscillation spectra, Nature, 325, 405-411.
51. Gorbatov, A., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2003. Joint bulk-sound and shear tomography for Western Pacific subduction zones, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 210, 527-543.
52. Gung, Y.C., & Romanowicz, B., 2004. Q tomography of the upper mantle using three component long period waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 813-830.
53. Halliday, D., & Curtis, A., 2008. Seismic interferometry, surface waves and source distribution, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 1067-1087.
54. Hedlin, M.A.H., Shearer, P.M., & Earle, P.S., 1997. Seismic evidence for small-scale heterogeneity throughout the Earth's mantle, Nature, 387(6629), 145-150.
55. Kang, T.-S., & Baag, C.-E., 2004. Finite-difference seismic simulation combining discontinuous grids with locally variable timesteps, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 94, 207-219.
56. Karabulut, H., Ozalaybey, S., Taymaz, T., Aktar, M., Selvi, O., & Kocaoglu, A., 2003. A tomographic image of the shallow crustal structure in the Eastern Marmara, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL018074
57. Kawakatsu, H., Kumar, P., Takei, Y., Shinohara, M., Kanazawa, T., Araki, E., & Suyehiro, K., 2009. Seismic evidence for sharp lithosphereasthenosphere boundaries of oceanic plates, Science, 324, 499-502.
58. Kennett, B.L.N., & Abdullah, A., 2011. Seismic wave attenuation beneath the Australasian region, Aust. J. Earth Sci., 58, 285-295.
59. Kennett, B.L.N., & Furumura, T., 2008. Stochastic waveguide in the lithosphere: Indonesian subduction zone to Australian craton, Geophys. J. Int., 172, 363-382.
60. Keskin, M., 2003. Magma generation by slab steepening and breakoff beneath a subduction accretion complex: an alternative model for collisionrelated volcanism in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, doi:10.1029/2003GL018019.
61. Kimman, W., & Trampert, J., 2010. Approximations in seismic interferometry and their effects on surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 461-476.
62. Kissling, E., 1988. Geotomography with local earthquake data, Rev. Geophys., 26, 659-698.
63. Koulakov, I., Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Grosser, H., & Milkereit, C., 2010. Distribution of seismic velocities and attenuation in the crust beneath the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey) from local earthquake tomography, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 100, 207-224.
64. Kristekova, M., Kristek, J., Moczo, P., & Day, S.M., 2006. Misfit criteria for quantitative comparison of seismograms, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 96, 1836-1850.
65. Lebedev, S., & van der Hilst, R.D., 2008. Global upper-mantle tomography with the automated multimode inversion of surface and S-wave forms, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 505-518.
66. Legendre, C.P., Meier, T., Lebedev, S., Friederich, W., & Viereck-Götte, L., 2008. A shear-wave velocity model of the European upper mantle from automated inversion of seismic shear and surface waveforms, Geophys. J. Int., 173, 505-518.
67. Lekić, V., & Romanowicz, B., 2011. Inferring upper-mantle structure by full waveformtomography with the spectral-elementmethod, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 799-831.
68. Lekić, V., Panning, M., & Romanowicz, B., 2010. A simple method for improving crustal corrections in waveform tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 265-278.
69. Li, C., van der Hilst, R.D., Engdahl, E.R., & Burdick, S., 2008. A new globalmodel for P-wave speed variations in the Earth's mantle, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys., 9, doi:10.1029/2007GC001806.
70. Liu, Q., & Gu, Y., 2012. Seismic imaging: from classical to adjoint tomography, Tectonophysics, 566-567, 31-66.
71. Liu, Q., & Tromp, J., 2008. Finite-frequency sensitivity kernels for global seismic wave propagation based upon adjoint methods, Geophys. J. Int., 174, 265-286.
72. Lobkis,O.I.&Weaver, R.L., 2001. On the emergence of theGreen's function in the correlations of a diffuse field, J. acoust. Soc. Am., 110, 3011-3017.
73. Love, A.E.H., 1927. A Treatise on the Theory of Elasticity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
74. Madec, R., Komatitsch, D., & Diaz, J., 2009. Energy-conserving local time stepping based on high-order finite elements for seismicwave propagation across a fluid-solid interface, Comp. Mod. Eng. Sci., 49, 163-189.
75. Marone, F., & Romanowicz, B., 2007. Non-linear crustal corrections in high resolution waveform seismic tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 170, 460- 467.
76. Marone, F., Gung, Y., & Romanowicz, B., 2007. Three-dimensional radial anisotropic structure of the North American upper mantle from inversion of surface waveform data, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 206-222.
77. Meier, U., Curtis, A., & Trampert, J., 2007a. Fully nonlinear inversion of fundamental mode surface waves for a global crustal model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, doi:10.1029/2007GL030989.
78. Meier, U., Curtis, A., & Trampert, J., 2007b. Global crustal thickness from neural network inversion of surface wave data, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 706-722.
79. Mercerat, E.D., & Nolet, G., 2012. Comparison of ray- and adjoint-based sensitivity kernels for body wave seismic tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, in press, doi:10.1029/2012GL052002.
80. Moczo, P., Kristek, J., Vavrycuk, V., Archuleta, R., & Halada, L., 2002. 3D heterogeneous staggered-grid finite-difference modeling of seismic motion with volume harmonic and arithmetic averaging of elastic moduli, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 92, 3042-3066.
81. Molinari, I., & Morelli, A., 2011. EP crust: a reference crustal model for the European Plate, Geophys. J. Int., 185, 352-364.
82. Montagner, J.P., & Anderson, D.L., 1989. Petrological constraints on seismic anisotropy, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 54, 82-105.
83. Morozova, E.A., Morozov, I.B., Smithson, S.B., & Solodilov, L.N., 1999. Heterogeneity of the uppermost mantle beneath Russian Eurasia from the ultra-long profile QUARTZ, J. geophys. Res., 104, 20 329-20 348.
84. Nataf, H.C., & Ricard, Y., 1996. 3SMAC: an a priori tomographic model of the upper mantle based on geophysical modelling, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 95, 101-122.
85. Nettles, M., & Dziewoński, A.M., 2008. Radially anisotropic shear velocity structure of the upper mantle globally and beneath North America, J. geophys. Res., 113, doi:10.1029/2006JB004819.
86. Nocedal, J., & Wright, S.J., 1999. Numerical Optimization, Springer, New York.
87. Okay, A.I., & Tüysüz, O., 1999. Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey, Geol. Soc. Lond., Spec. Publ., 156, 475-515.
88. Panning, M., & Romanowicz, B., 2006. A three-dimensional radially anisotropic model of shear velocity in the whole mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 361-379.
89. Peter, D., et al. 2011. Forward and adjoint simulations of seismic wave propagation on fully unstructured hexahedral meshes, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 721-739.
90. Plessix, R.-E., 2006. A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 495-503.
91. Poore, H.R., White, N.J., & Maclennan, J., 2011. Ocean circulation and mantle melting controlled by radial flow of hot pulses in the Iceland plume, Nat. Geosci., 4, 558-561.
92. Priestley, K., & McKenzie, D., 2006. The thermal structure of the lithosphere from shear wave velocities, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 244, 285- 301.
93. Rawlinson, N., Pogay, S., & Fishwick, S., 2010. Seismic tomography: a window to the deep Earth, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 178, 101-135.
94. Reid, F.J.L., Woodhouse, J.H., & van Heijst, H.J., 2001. Upper mantle attenuation and velocity structure from measurements of differential S phases, Geophys. J. Int., 145, 615-630.
95. Rickers, F., Fichtner, A., & Trampert, J., 2012. Imaging mantle plumes with instantaneous phase measurements of diffracted waves, Geophys. J. Int., 190, 650-664.
96. Rickers, F., Fichtner, A., & Trampert, J., 2013. The Iceland-Jan Mayen plume system and its impact on mantle dynamics in the North Atlantic region: evidence from full-waveform inversion, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 367, 39-51.
97. Ritsema, J., & van Heijst, H.J., 2002. Constraints on the correlation of P- and S-wave velocity heterogeneity in the mantle from P, PP, PPP and PKPab traveltimes, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 482-489.
98. Ritsema, J., van Heijst, H., & Woodhouse, J.H., 1999. Complex shear wave velocity structure imaged beneath Africa and Iceland, Science, 286, 1925- 1928.
99. Ritsema, J., Deuss, A., van Heijst, H.J., & Woodhouse, J.H., 2011. S40RTS: a degree-40 shear-velocity model for the mantle from new Rayleigh wave dispersion, teleseismic traveltime and normal-mode splitting function measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 184, 1223-1236.
100. Riznichenko, J.V., 1949. On seismic anisotropy, Isvestiya Akad. Nauk. SSSR, seria geograficheskaya i geofischeskaya, 13, 518-544.
101. Romanowicz, B., 1995. A global tomographic model of shear attenuation in the upper mantle, J. geophys. Res., 100, 12 375-12 394.
102. Rydberg, T., Tittgemeyer, M., & Wenzel, F., 2000. Finite-difference modelling of P-wave scattering in the upper mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 787-800.
103. Salaün, G., et al. 2012. High-resolution surface wave tomography beneath the Aegean-Anatolia region: constraints on upper-mantle structure, Geophys. J. Int., 190, 406-420.
104. Saunders, P., Priestley, K., & Taymaz, T., 1998. Variations in the crustal structure beneath western Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 373-389.
105. Schäfer, J., Boschi, L.&Kissling, E., 2011. Adaptively parametrized surface wave tomography: methodology and a new model of the European upper mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 186, 1431-1453.
106. Selby, N.D., & Woodhouse, J.H., 2002. The Q structure of the upper mantle: constraints from Rayleigh wave amplitudes, J. geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/2001JB000257.
107. Sengör, A.M.C., Özeren, S., Genc, T., & Zor, E., 2003. East Anatolian high plateau as a mantle-supported, north-south shortened domal structure, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, doi:10.1029/2003GL017858.
108. Shapiro, N.M., Campillo, M., Stehly, L., & Ritzwoller, M., 2005. High resolution surface wave tomography from ambient seismic noise, Science, 307, 1615-1618.
109. Shaw-Champion, M.E., White, N.J., Jones, S.M., & Lovell, J.P.B., 2008. Quantifying transient mantle plume uplift in the Faroe-Shetland basin, Tectonics, 27, doi:10.1029/2007TC002106.
110. Spakman,W., van der Lee, S., & van der Hilst, R., 1993. Travel-time tomography of the European-Mediterranean mantle down to 1400 km, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 79, 3-74.
111. Stich, D., Danecek, P., Morelli, A.&Tromp, J., 2009. Imaging lateral heterogeneity in the northern Apennines from time reversal of reflected surface waves, Geophys. J. Int., 177, 543-554.
112. Takeuchi, H., & Saito, M., 1972. Seismic surface waves, in Methods in Computational Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 217-295, ed. Bolt, B.A., Academic Press, New York.
113. Tape, C., Liu, Q., Maggi, A., & Tromp, J., 2009. Adjoint tomography of the southern California crust, Science, 325, 988-992.
114. Tape, C., Liu, Q., Maggi, A., & Tromp, J., 2010. Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based upon spectral-element and adjoint methods, Geophys. J. Int., 180, 433-462.
115. Tarantola, A., 1988. Theoretical background for the inversion of seismic waveforms, including elasticity and attenuation, Pure appl. Geophys., 128, 365-399.
116. Tessmer, E., 2000. Seismic finite-difference modellingwith spatially varying time steps, Geophysics, 65, 1290-1293.
117. Tian,Y., Sigloch, K.&Nolet, G., 2009. Multiple-frequency SH-wave tomography for the western US upper mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 1384-1402.
118. Trampert, J., & Fichtner, A., 2013. Global imaging of the Earth's deep interior: seismic constraints on (an)isotropy, density and attenuation, in Physics and Chemistry of the Deep Earth, pp. 324-350, ed . Karato, S., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
119. Tromp J. Tape, C., & Liu, Q., 2005. Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal and banana-doughnut kernels, Geophys. J. Int., 160, 195- 216.
120. Tromp, J., Luo, Y., Hanasoge, S., & Peter, D., 2010. Noise cross-correlation sensitivity kernels, Geophys. J. Int., 183, 791-819.
121. Tsai, V.C., 2009. On establishing the accuracy of noise tomography traveltime measurements in a realistic medium, Geophys. J. Int., 178, 1555- 1564.
122. van Hinsbergen, D.J.J., Kaymakci, N., Spakman, W., & Torsvik, T.H., 2010. Reconciling the geological history of western Turkey with plate circuits and mantle tomography, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 297, 674-686.
123. Vanacore, E., Taymaz, T., & Saygin, E., 2013. Moho structure of the Anatolian plate from receiver function analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 193, 329-337.
124. Virieux, J., & Operto, S., 2009. An overview of full waveform inversion in exploration geophysics, Geophysics, 74, WCC127-WCC152.
125. Wapenaar, K., 2004. Retrieving the elastodynamic Green's function of an arbitrary inhomogeneous medium by cross correlation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.254301.
126. Warren, L.M., & Shearer, P.M., 2002. Mapping lateral variations in upper mantle attenuation by stacking P and PP spectra, J. geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/2001JB001195.
127. Woodhouse, J.H., & Dziewoński, A.M., 1984. Mapping the upper mantle: three-dimensional modeling of Earth structure by inversion of seismic waveforms, J. geophys. Res., 89, 5953-5986.
128. Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S., Biryol, C.B., Beck, S., Zandt, G., Taymaz, T., Adiyaman, H.E., & Özacar, H.E., 2012. 3-D crustal structure along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in north-central Anatolia revealed by local earthquake tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 188, 819-849.
129. Yoshizawa, K., & Ekström, G., 2010. Automated multimode phase speed measurements for high-resolution regional-scale tomography: application to North America, Geophys. J. Int., 183, 1538-1558.
130. Yoshizawa, K., & Kennett, B.L.N., 2004. Multi-mode surface wave tomography for the Australian region using a 3-stage approach incorporating finite-frequency effects, J. geophys. Res., 109, doi:10.1029/2002JB002254.
131. Zhou, Y., Nolet, G., Dahlen, F.A., & Laske, G., 2006. Global upper-mantle structure from finite-frequency surface-wave tomography, J. geophys. Res., 111, doi:10.1029/2005JB003677.
132. Zhou, Y., Lui, Q., & Tromp, J., 2011. Surface-wave sensitivity: mode summation versus adjoint SEM, Geophys. J. Int., 187, 1560-1576.
133. Zhu, H., Bozdaǧ, E., Peter, D., & Tromp, J., 2012. Structure of the European upper mantle revealed by adjoint tomography, Nat. Geosci., 5, 493-498.
134. Zielhuis, A., & Nolet, G., 1994a. Deep seismic expression of an ancient plate boundary in Europe, Science, 265, 79-81.
135. Zielhuis, A., & Nolet, G., 1994b. Shear-wave velocity variations in the upper mantle beneath central Europe, Geophys. J. Int., 117, 695-715.