Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based on spectral-element and adjoint methods

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 180, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 433-462

  Tape, Carl ^a   Liu, Qinya ^b   Maggi, Alessia ^c   Tromp, Jeroen ^d  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body waves; Computational seismology; Crustal structure; Inverse theory; Seismic tomography; Surface waves and free oscillations

Indexed keywords

ADJOINT METHOD; ALGORITHM; BODY WAVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA INVERSION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; INVERSE PROBLEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; OSCILLATION; SEISMIC DATA; SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY; SEISMOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURFACE WAVE; TRAVEL TIME; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 73049084689     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04429.x     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. Aagaard BT. Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Part II: gound-motion estimates for the 1906 earthquake and scenario events. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008a, 98(2):1012-1046.
2. Aagaard BT. Ground-motion modeling of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Part I: validation using the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008b, 98(2):989-1011.
3. Agnew DC, Sieh KE. A documentary study of the felt effects of the great California earthquake of 1857. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1978, 68(6):1717-1729.
4. Akçelik V. High resolution forward and inverse earthquake modeling on terascale computers. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Supercomputing Conference (SC'03) 2003, 10.1109/SC.2003.10056, in, doi
5. Amante C, Eakins BW. ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. 2008, National Geophysical Data Center, NESDIS, NOAA, U.S. Dept. Commerce, Boulder, CO, USA
6. Anderson DL. Elastic wave propagation in layered anisotropic media. J. geophys. Res. 1961, 66(9):2953-2963.
7. Bamberger A, Chavent G, Hemon C, Lailly P. Inversion of normal incidence seismograms. Geophysics 1982, 47(5):757-770.
8. Ben-Menahem A. Source mechanism of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 1978, 17:163-181.
9. Ben-Zion Y, Andrews DJ. Properties and implications of dynamic rupture along a material interface. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1998, 88(4):1085-1094.
10. Bird P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2003, 4:1027. 10.1029/2001GC000252, doi
11. Bonner JL, Blackwell DD, Herrin ET. Thermal constraints on earthquake depths in California. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2003, 93(6):2333-2354.
12. Brocher T, Aagaard B, Simpson R, Jachens R. The new USGS 3D seismic velocity model of northern California (abstract). Seism. Res. Lett. 2006, 77:271.
13. Brocher TM. Empirical relations between elastic wavespeeds and density in the Earth's crust. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2005, 95(6):2081-2092.
14. Burchfiel B, Cowan DS, Davis GA, Burchfiel BC, Lipman PW, Zoback ML. Tectonic overview of the Cordilleran orogen in the western United States. The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous U.S. 1992, Vol. G-3:407-479. in, The Geology of North America, pp, eds, Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, CO, USA
15. Capdeville Y, Chaljub E, Vilotte JP, Montagner JP. Coupling the spectral element method with a modal solution for elastic wave propagation in global earth models. Geophys. J. Int. 2003, 152:34-67.
16. Chavent G, Dupuy M, Lemonnier P. History matching by use of optimal theory. Soc. Petrol. Eng. J. 1975, 15(1):74-86.
17. Cheadle MJ. The deep crustal structure of the Mojave Desert, California, from COCORP seismic reflection data. Tectonics 1986, 5(2):293-320.
18. Chen P, Zhao L, Jordan TH. Full 3D tomography for the crustal structure of the Los Angeles region. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2007, 97(4):1094-1120.
19. Christensen NI. Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology. J. geophys. Res. 1996, 101(B2):3139-3156.
20. Christensen NI, Mooney WD. Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view. J. geophys. Res. 1995, 100(B7):9761-9788.
21. Claerbout JF. Toward a unified theory of reflector mapping. Geophysics 1971, 36(3):467-481.
22. Clinton JF, Hauksson E, Solanki K. An evaluation of the SCSN moment tensor solutions: robustness of the Mw magnitude scale, style of faulting, and automation of the method. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96(5):1689-1705.
23. Custódio S, Liu P, Archuleta RJ. The 2004 Mw6.0 Parkfield, California, earthquake: inversion of near-source ground motion using multiple data sets. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32:L23312. 10.1029/2005GL024417, doi
24. Dahlen FA, Baig AM. Fréchet kernels for body-wave amplitudes. Geophys. J. Int. 2002, 150:440-446.
25. Dahlen FA, Tromp J. Theoretical Global Seismology 1998, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, USA
26. Das T, Nolet G. Crustal thickness map of the western United States by partitioned waveform inversion. J. geophys. Res. 1998, 103(B12):30 021-30 038.
27. Davis TL, Bazeley WJM, Pacific Section SEPM. Structure of the Cuyama Valley, Caliente Range, and Carrizo Plain and its significance to the structural style of the southern Coast Ranges and western Transverse Ranges. Tertiary Tectonics and Sedimentation in the Cuyama Basin, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties, California 1988, 141-158. in, pp, ed., Los Angeles, CA, USA
28. Dreger DS, Helmberger DV. Broadband modeling of local earthquakes. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1990, 80(5):1162-1179.
29. Dziewonski A, Anderson D. Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 1981, 25:297-356.
30. Faccioli E, Maggio F, Paolucci R, Quarteroni A. 2D and 3D elastic wave propagation by a pseudo-spectral domain decomposition method. J. Seism. 1997, 1:237-251.
31. Fay NP, Bennett RA, Spinler JC, Humphreys ED. Small-scale upper mantle convection and crustal dynamics in southern California. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2008, 9(8):Q08006. 10.1029/2008GC001988, doi
32. Fichtner A, Kennett BLN, Igel H, Bunge H-P. Theoretical background for continental- and global-scale full-waveform inversion in the time-frequency domain. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 175:665-685.
33. Fichtner A, Kennett BLN, Igel H, Bunge H-P. Full seismic waveform tomography for upper-mantle structure in the Australasian region using adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 179:1703-1725.
34. Fuis GS, Ryberg T, Godfrey NJ, Okaya DA, Murphy JM. Crustal structure and tectonics from the Los Angeles basin to the Mojave Desert, southern California. Geology 2001, 29(1):15-18.
35. Fuis GS. Fault systems of the 1971 San Fernando and 1994 Northridge earthquakes, southern California: relocated aftershocks and seismic images from LARSE II. Geology 2003, 31(2):171-174.
36. Fuis GS, Kohler MD, Scherwath M, ten Brink U, Van Avendonk HJA, Murphy JM, Okaya D, Stern T, Davey F. A comparison between the transpressional plate boundaries of South Island, New Zealand, and southern California, USA: The Alpine and San Andreas Fault systems. A Continental Plate Boundary: Tectonics at South Island, New Zealand: Geophys. Monogr. Series 2007, Vol. 175:307-327. in, pp, eds, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC
37. Goldstein P, Dodge D, Firpo M, Minner L, Lee WHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C. SAC2000: Signal processing and analysis tools for seismologists and engineers. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Part B 2002, Vol. 81:1613-1614. in, International Geophysics Series, pp, eds, Academic Press, London
38. Goodman ED, Malin PE. Evolution of the southern San Joaquin basin and mid-Tertiary " transitional" tectonics, central California. Tectonics 1992, 11(3):478-498.
39. Grand SP, van der Hilst RD, Widiyantoro S. Global seismic tomography: a snapshot of convection in the Earth. GSA Today 1997, 7(4):1-7.
40. Grove M, Jacobson CE, Barth AP, Vucic A, Johnson SE, Paterson SR, Fletcher JM, Girty GH, Kimbrough DL, Martin-Barajas A. Temporal and spatial trends of Late Cretaceous-early Tertiary underplating of Pelona and related schist beneath southern California and southwestern Arizona. Tectonic evolution of northwestern Mexico and the southwestern USA 2003, 381-406. in, pp, eds, Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, CO, USA, Special Paper 388
41. Hardebeck JL, Shearer PM. Using S/P amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2003, 93(6):2434-2444.
42. Hauksson E. Crustal structure and seismicity distribution adjacent to the Pacific and North America plate boundary in southern California. J. geophys. Res. 2000, 105(B6):13 875-13 903.
43. Hauksson E, Unruh J. Regional tectonics of the Coso geothermal area along the intracontinental plate boundary in central eastern California: three-dimensional Vp and Vp/Vs models, spatial-temporal seismicity patterns, and seismogenic deformation. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B06309. 10.1029/2006JB004721, doi
44. Hauksson E, Oppenheimer D, Brocher TM. Imaging the source region of the 2003 San Simeon earthquake within the weak Franciscan subduction complex, central California. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, 31:L20607. 10.1029/2004GL021049, doi
45. Hauksson E. Preliminary report on the 29 July 2008 Mw 5.4 Chino Hills, eastern Los Angeles basin, California, earthquake sequence. Seism. Res. Lett. 2008, 79(6):855-866.
46. Humphreys ED, Clayton RW. Tomographic image of the southern California mantle. J. geophys. Res. 1990, 95(B12):19 725-19 746.
47. Igel H, Djikpéssé H, Tarantola A. Waveform inversion of marine reflection seismograms for P impedance and Poisson's ratio. Geophys. J. Int. 1996, 124:363-371.
48. Jachens R, Simpson R, Graymer R, Wentworth C, Brocher T. Three-dimensional geologic map of northern and central California: a basic model for supporting earthquake simulations and other predictive modeling (abstract). Seism. Res. Lett. 2006, 77:270.
49. Jacobson CE, Oyarzabal FR, Haxel GB. Subduction and exhumation of the Pelona-Orocopia-Rand schists, southern California. Geology 1996, 24(6):547-550.
50. Jenkins OP, Oakeshott GB. Earthquakes in Kern County, California During 1952 1955, State of California Natural Resources, Division of Mines, San Francisco, CA, USA, Bulletin 171
51. Jennings CW. 1994, Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas, with locations and ages of recent volcanic eruptions, Calif. Div. Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 6, map scale 1:750,000
52. Kanamori H. The energy release in great earthquakes. J. geophys. Res. 1977, 82:2981-2987.
53. Kanamori H, Hadley D. Crustal structure and temporal velocity change in southern California. Pure appl. Geophys. 1975, 113:257-280.
54. Keller B, Prothero W. Western Transverse Ranges crustal structure. J. geophys. Res. 1987, 92(B8):7890-7906.
55. Kennett BLN, Sambridge MS, Williamson PR. Subspace methods for large inverse problems with multiple parameter classes. Geophys. J. Int. 1988, 94:237-247.
56. Komatitsch D, Tromp J. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophys. J. Int. 1999, 139:806-822.
57. Komatitsch D, Tromp J. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-I. Validation. Geophys. J. Int. 2002a, 149:390-412.
58. Komatitsch D, Tromp J. Spectral-element simulations of global seismic wave propagation-II. Three-dimensional models, oceans, rotation and self-gravitation. Geophys. J. Int. 2002b, 150:308-318.
59. Komatitsch D, Vilotte J-P. The spectral element method: an efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1998, 88(2):368-392.
60. Komatitsch D, Liu Q, Tromp J, Süss P, Stidham C, Shaw JH. Simulations of ground motion in the Los Angeles basin based upon the spectral-element method. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2004, 94(1):187-206.
61. Langenheim VE. 1999, Gravity and Aeromagnetic Models along the Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment (Line 1), California, Open-File Report 99-388
62. Laske G, Masters G. Constraints on global phase velocity maps from long-period polarization data. J. geophys. Res. 1996, 101(B7):16 059-16 075.
63. Le Pourhiet L, Gurnis M, Saleeby J. Mantle instability beneath the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California and Death Valley extension. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 2006, 251:104-119.
64. Legg MR, Osborne RH. Developments in understanding the tectonic evolution of the California Continental Borderland. From Shoreline to Abyss 1991, 291-312. in, pp, ed., SEPM, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
65. Legg MR, Goldfinger C, Kamerling MJ, Chaytor JD, Einstein DE, Cunningham WD, Mann P. Morphology, structure and evolution of California Continental Borderland restraining bends. Tectonics of Strike-Slip Restraining and Releasing Bends 2007, 143-168. in, pp, eds, Geol. Soc. London, Special Publication 290
66. Lin G, Shearer PM, Hauksson E. Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross correlation, and cluster analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005. J. geophys. Res. 2007a, 112:B12309. 10.1029/2007JB004986, doi
67. Lin G, Shearer PM, Hauksson E, Thurber CH. A three-dimensional crustal seismic velocity model for southern California from a composite event method. J. geophys. Res. 2007b, 112:B11306. 10.1029/2007JB004977, doi
68. Liu Q, Tromp J. Finite-frequency kernels based on adjoint methods. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96(6):2383-2397.
69. Liu Q, Tromp J. Finite-frequency sensitivity kernels for global seismic wave propagation based upon adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 2008, 174:265-286.
70. Liu Q, Polet J, Komatitsch D, Tromp J. Spectral-element moment tensor inversions for earthquakes in southern California. Bull. seis. Soc. Am. 2004, 94(5):1748-1761.
71. Lohman RB, McGuire JJ. Earthquake swarms driven by aseismic creep in the Salton Trough, California. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B04405. 10.1029/2006JB004596, doi
72. Louie JN, Clayton RW. The nature of deep crustal structures in the Mojave Desert, California. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 1987, 89:125-132.
73. Lovely P, Shaw JH, Liu Q, Tromp J. A structural VP model of the Salton Trough, California, and its implications for seismic hazard. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96(5):1882-1896.
74. Ludwig WJ, Nafe JE, Drake CL, Maxwell AE. Seismic refraction. New Concepts of Sea Floor Evolution 1970, Vol. 4:53-84. in, The Sea: Ideas and Observations on Progress in the Study of the Seas, pp, ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York
75. Luffi P, Saleeby JB, Lee C-TA, Ducea MN. Lithospheric mantle duplex beneath the central Mojave Desert revealed by xenoliths from Dish Hill, California. J. geophys. Res. 2009, 114:B03202. 10.1029/2008JB005906, doi
76. Luo Y, Schuster GT. Wave-equation traveltime inversion. Geophysics 1991, 56:645-653.
77. Luyendyk BP, Kamerling MJ, Terres R. Geometric model for Neogene crustal rotations in southern California. Geol. soc. Am. Bull. 1980, 91:211-217.
78. Maggi A, Tape C, Chen M, Chao D, Tromp J. An automated time-window selection algorithm for seismic tomography. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 178:257-281.
79. McLaren MK, Hardebeck JL, van der Elst N, Unruh J, Bawden GW, Blai JL. Complex faulting associated with the 22 December 2003 MW 6.5 San Simeon, California, earthquake, aftershocks, and postseismic surface deformation. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008, 98(4):1659-1680.
80. McMechan GA. Determination of source parameters by wavefield extrapolation. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 1982, 71:613-628.
81. Mora P. Nonlinear two-dimensional elastic inversion of multioffset seismic data. Geophysics 1987, 52(9):1211-1228.
82. Murphy JM, Fuis GS, Ryberg T, Lutter WJ, Catchings RD, Goldman MR. Detailed P- and S-wave velocity models along the LARSE II transect, southern California. EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un. 2008, 89. in, Fall. Meet. Suppl., Abstract S11C-1763
83. Namson J, Davis TL. Late Cenozoic fold and thrust belt of the southern Coast Ranges and Santa Maria basin, California. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 1990, 74(4):467-492.
84. Nazareth JJ, Clayton RW. Crustal structure of the Borderland-Continent Transition Zone of southern California adjacent to Los Angeles. J. geophys. Res. 2003, 108(B8):2404. 10.1029/2001JB000223, doi
85. Nicholson C, Sorlien CC, Luyendyk BP. Deep crustal structure and tectonics in the offshore Santa Maria Basin, California. Geology 1992, 20(3):239-242.
86. Nicholson C, Sorlien CC, Atwater T, Crowell JC, Luyendyk BP. Microplate capture, rotation of the western Transverse Ranges, and initiation of the San Andreas transform as a low-angle fault system. Geology 1994, 22(6):491-495.
87. Olsen KB. Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33:L07305. 10.1029/2005GL0254720, doi
88. Pellerin CLM, Christensen NI. Interpretation of crustal seismic velocities in the San Gabriel-Mojave region, southern California. Tectonophysics 1998, 286:253-271.
89. Percival D, Walden A. Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications 1993, Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge, UK
90. Petersen MD, Wesnousky SG. Fault slip rates and earthquake histories for active faults in southern California. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1994, 84(5):1608-1649.
91. Plesch A, Tape C, Shaw JH. CVM-H 6.0: Inversion integration, the San Joaquin Valley and other advances in the community velocity model. 2009 Southern California Earthquake Center Annual Meeting, Proceedings and Abstracts 2009, Vol. 19:260-261. in, pp
92. Pratt RG, Shin CS, Hicks GJ. Gauss-Newton and full Newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion. Geophys. J. Int. 1998, 133:341-362.
93. Ritsema J, van Heijst HJ, Woodhouse JH. Complex shear velocity structure imaged beneath Africa and Iceland. Science 1999, 286:1925-1928.
94. Rodgers A, Petersson A, Nilsson S, Sjögreen B, McCandless K. Broadband waveform modeling of moderate earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay area and preliminary assessment of the USGS 3D seismic velocity model. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2008, 98(2):969-988.
95. Romanyuk T, Mooney WD, Detweiler S. Two lithospheric profiles across southern California derived from gravity and seismic data. J. Geodyn. 2007, 43:274-307.
96. Ryberg T, Fuis GS. The San Gabriel Mountains bright reflective zone: possible evidence of young mid-crustal thrust faulting in southern California. Tectonophysics 1998, 286:31-46.
97. Saleeby J. Segmentation of the Laramide Slab-evidence from the southern Sierra Nevada region. Geol. soc. Am. Bull. 2003, 115(6):655-668.
98. Sambridge MS, Tarantola A, Kennett BLN. An alternative strategy for non-linear inversion of seismic waveforms. Geophys. Prospect. 1991, 39:723-736.
99. Savage B, Helmberger DV. Complex Rayleigh waves resulting from deep sedimentary basins. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 218:229-239.
100. Shapiro NM, Campillo M, Stehly L, Ritzwoller MH. High-resolution surface-wave tomography from ambient seismic noise. Science 2005, 307:1615-1618.
101. Sieh KE. Slip along the San Andreas fault associated with the great 1857 earthquake. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1978, 68(5):1421-1448.
102. Sieminski A, Liu Q, Trampert J, Tromp J. Finite-frequency sensitivity of surface waves to anisotropy based upon adjoint methods. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168:1153-1174.
103. Stich D, Danecek P, Morelli A, Tromp J. Imaging lateral heterogeneity in the northern Apennines from time reversal of reflected surface waves. Geophys. J. Int. 2009, 177:543-554.
104. Süss MP, Shaw JH. P-wave seismic velocity structure derived from sonic logs and industry reflection data in the Los Angeles basin, California. J. geophys. Res. 2003, 108(B3):2170. 10.1029/2001JB001628, doi
105. Talagrand O, Courtier P. Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation. I: theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 1987, 113:1311-1328.
106. Tan Y. Broadband Waveform Modeling Over a Dense Seismic Network. 2006, PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
107. Tape C. Seismic Tomography of Southern California Using Adjoint Methods. 2009, PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
108. Tape C, Liu Q, Tromp J. Finite-frequency tomography using adjoint methods-methodology and examples using membrane surface waves. Geophys. J. Int. 2007, 168:1105-1129.
109. Tape C, Liu Q, Maggi A, Tromp J. Adjoint tomography of the southern California crust. Science 2009, 325:988-992.
110. Tape C, Sambridge M, Tromp J. Adjoint tomography based on source subspace projection. Geophys. J. Int. 2010, in preparation
111. Tarantola A. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 1984, 49(8):1259-1266.
112. Tarantola A. Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation 2005, SIAM, Philadelphia, USA
113. ten Brink US, Zhang J, Brocher TM, Okaya DA, Klitgord KD, Fuis GS. Geophysical evidence for the evolution of the California Innter Continental Borderland as a metamorphic core complex. J. geophys. Res. 2000, 105(B3):5835-5857.
114. Thurber C, Zhang H, Waldhauser F, Hardebeck J, Michael A, Eberhart-Phillips D. Three-dimensional compressional wavespeed model, earthquake relocations, and focal mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, region. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 2006, 96(4B):S38-S49.
115. Tromp J, Tape C, Liu Q. Seismic tomography, adjoint methods, time reversal, and banana-doughnut kernels. Geophys. J. Int. 2005, 160:195-216.
116. Virieux J, Operto S. Full waveform inversion: theory, algorithms and applications. Geophysics 2010
117. Wald LA, Hutton LK, Given DD. The Southern California Network Bulletin: 1990-1993 summary. Seism. Res. Lett. 1995, 66(1):9-19.
118. Wessel P, Smith WHF. Free software helps map and display data. EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un. 1991, 72(41):441.
119. Yan Z, Clayton RW. Regional mapping of the crustal structure in southern California from receiver functions. J. geophys. Res. 2007, 112:B05311. 10.1029/2006JB004622, doi
120. Zhou Y, Dahlen FA, Nolet G. Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for surface wave observables. Geophys. J. Int. 2004, 158:142-168.
121. Zhu L, Helmberger D. Advancement in source estimation techniques using broadband regional seismograms. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 1996, 86(5):1634-1641.
122. Zhu L, Kanamori H. Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions. J. geophys. Res. 2000, 105(B2):2969-2980.