Decentralization and development

Handbook of Fiscal Federalism

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 201-223

  Bardhan, Pranab ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879459414     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Alderman, H. (1998), 'Social assistance in Albania: decentralization and targeted transfers', Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) Working Paper no. 134, World Bank, Washington DC.
2. Azfar, O., S. Kähkönen and P. Meagher (2002), 'Conditions for effective decentralized governnance: a synthesis of research findings', IRIS Center Working Paper, University of Maryland.
3. Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2000a), 'Corruption and decentralization of infrastructure delivery in developing countries', University of California, Berkeley, forthcoming in Economic Journal.
4. Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2000b), 'Relative capture of government at local and national levels', American Economic Review, 90(2), 135-39.
5. Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2004), 'Pro-poor targeting and accountability of local governments in West Bengal', forthcoming in Journal of Development Economics.
6. Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (2005), 'Decentralizing anti-poverty program delivery in developing countries', Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 675-704 .
7. Bardhan, P. and D. Mookherjee (forthcoming), Decentralization to Local Governments in Developing Countries: A Comparative Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Besley, T. and A. Case (1995), 'Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting and yardstick competition', American Economic Review, 85(1), 25-45.
9. Besley, T. and S. Coate (2003), 'Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: a political economy analysis', Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2611-37.
10. Besley, T., R. Pande, L. Rahman and V. Rao (2004), 'The politics of public goods provision: evidence from Indian local government', Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(2/3), 416-26.
11. Besley, T., R. Pande and V. Rao (forthcoming), 'Participatory democracy in action: survey evidence from South India', Journal of the European Economic Association.
12. Bird, R. (1995), 'Decentralizing infrastructure: for good or for ill?', in Estache (ed.).
13. Blanchard, O. and A. Shleifer (2000), 'Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia', NBER Working Paper no. 7616, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
14. Cai, H. and D. Treisman (2004), 'State corroding federalism', Journal of Public Economics, 88(3/4), 819-43.
15. Chattopadhyay, R. and E. Duflo (2004), 'Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India', Econometrica 72(5), 1409-43.
16. Coady, D. (2001), 'An evaluation of the distributional power of Progresa's cash transfers in Mexico', International Food Policy Research Institute Working Paper, Washington, DC.
17. Conning, J. and M. Kevane (2002), 'Community based targeting mechanisms for social safety nets: a critical review', World Development, 30(3), 375-94.
18. Crook, R. and J. Manor (1998), Democracy and Decentralization in South Asia and West Africa, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Das, M.K. (2000), 'Kerala's decentralized planning', Economic and Political Weekly, 35, 4300-4303.
20. Estache, A. (ed.) (1995), Decentralizing Infrastructure: Advantages and Limitations, World Bank Discussion Papers 290, Washington, DC.
21. Faguet, J.-P. (2001), 'Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Decentralization and public investment in Bolivia', Centre for Economic Performance Working Paper, London School of Economics.
22. Foster, A.D. and M.R. Rosenzweig (2001), 'Democratization, decentralization and the distribution of local public goods in a poor rural economy', unpublished, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
23. Galasso, E. and M. Ravallion (2005), 'Decentralized targeting of an anti-poverty program', Journal of Public Economics, 89(4), 705-27.
24. Gelbach, J. and L. Pritchett (2000), 'Indicator targeting in a political economy: Leakier can be better', Journal of Policy Reform, 4(1), 113-45.
25. Hanson, R.L. and J.T. Hartman (1994), 'Do welfare magnets attract?', Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
26. Henderson, J.V. and A. Kuncoro (2004), 'Corruption in Indonesia', NBER Working Paper no. 10674, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
27. Isham, J., D. Narayan and L. Pritchett (1995), 'Does participation improve performance? Establishing causality with subjective data', World Bank Economic Review, 9(2), 175-200.
28. Jimenez, E. and Y. Sawanda (1999), 'Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador's EDUCO Program', World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 415-42.
29. King, E. and B. Ozler (1998), 'What's decentralization got to do with learning? The case of Nicaragua's school autonomy reform', Development Research Group Working Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.
30. Kremer, M., N. Chaudhuri, F.H. Rogers, K. Muralidharan and J. Hammer (forthcoming), 'Teacher absence in India: a snapshot', Journal of European Economic Association.
31. Mitra, S.K. and V.B. Singh (1999), Democracy and Social Change in India: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Electorate, Sage, New Delhi.
32. Moene, K. and M. Wallerstein (2001), 'Inequality, social insurance and redistribution', American Political Science Review, 95(4), 859-74.
33. Oates, W. (1972), Fiscal Federalism, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
34. Olson, M. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Poncet, S. (2004), 'A fragmented China', Tinbergen Institute Working Paper 103/2, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
36. Qian, Y. and G. Roland (1998), 'Federalism and the soft budget constraint', American Economic Review, 88(5), 1143-62.
37. Qian, Y. and B.R. Weingast (1997), 'Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 83-92.
38. Reinikka, R. and J. Svensson (2004), 'Local capture: evidence from a central government transfer program in Uganda', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(2), 679-705.
39. Rodden, J. and S. Rose-Ackerman (1997), 'Does federalism preserve markets?', Virginia Law Review, 83(7), 1521-72.
40. Santos, B.D.S. (1998), 'Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy', Politics and Society, 26(4), 461-510.
41. Seabright, P. (1996), 'Accountability and decentralization in government: an incomplete contracts model', European Economic Review, 40(1), 61-89.
42. Shirk, S. (1993), The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China, University of California Press, Berkeley.
43. Somanathan, E., R. Prabhakar and B. Singh Mehta (2005), 'Does decentralization work? Forest conservation in the Himalayas', unpublished, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi.
44. Stepan, A. (1999), 'Federalism and democracy', Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19-33.
45. Tiebout, C.M. (1956), 'A pure theory of local expenditures', Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-24.
46. Tommasi, M. and F. Weinschelbaum (1999), 'A principal-agent building block for the study of decentralization and integration', University of San Andres, Argentina.
47. Treisman. D. (1999), 'Political decentralization and economic reform: a game-theoretic analysis', American Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 488-517.
48. Wade, R. (1997), 'How infrastructure agencies motivate staff: canal irrigation in India and the Republic of Korea', in A. Mody (ed.), Infrastructure Strategies in East Asia, EDI, World Bank, Washington, DC.
49. Wildasin, D.E. (1997), 'Externalities and bailouts: hard and soft budget constraints in intergovernmental fiscal relations', World Bank Policy Research Paper 1843, Washington, DC.
50. Zhuravskaya, E.V. (2000), 'Incentives to provide local public goods: fiscal federalism, Russian style', Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 337-68.