Incentives to provide local public goods: Fiscal federalism, Russian style

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 337-368

  Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina V ^a,b  

^a Russ Europ Ctr for Economic Plcy   (Russian Federation)

^b STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Federalism; H11; H41; H71; Local government; O57; P35; Russia; Transition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002435591     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00090-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arora V.B., Norregaard J. Intergovernmental fiscal relations: the Chinese system in perspective. 1997;IMF. Working Paper, WP/97/129.
2. Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. Privatizing Russia. 1995;MIT Press.
3. Transition Report. 1997;EBRD, London.
4. Jin H., Qian Y., Weingast B.R. Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: federalism, Chinese style. 1999;Stanford University. Working Paper, SWP-99-013.
5. Johnson S., Kaufmann D., Shleifer A. The unofficial economy in transition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2:1997;159-239.
6. Knight J., Li S. Fiscal decentralization: incentives, redistribution and reform in China. Oxford Development Studies. 27:(1):1999;5-32.
7. Lavrov A. Fiscal federalism and financial stabilization. Problems of Economic Transition. 39:(1):1996;83-94.
8. Montinola G., Qian Y., Weingast B.R. Federalism Chinese style: the political basis for economic success in China. World Politics. 48:(1):1995;50-81.
9. Oi J. Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics. 45:1992;99-126.
10. Oi J. Rural China Takes Off: Incentives for Reform. 1994;University of California Press, Berkeley.
11. Qian Y., Weingast B.R. China's transition to markets: market-preserving federalism, Chinese style. Journal of Policy Reform. 1:(2):1996;149-186.
12. Qian Y., Weingast B.R. Federalism as a commitment to reserving market incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11:(4):1997;83-92.
13. Qian Y., Xu C. Why China's economic reforms differ: the M-Form hierarchy and entry/expansion of non-state sector. Economics of Transition. 1:(2):1993;135-170.
14. Parker S., Tritt G., Woo W.T. Some lessons learned from the comparison of transition in Asia and Eastern Europe. Woo W.T., Parker S., Sachs J.D. Economies in Transition: Comparing Asia and Eastern Europe. 1997;MIT Press.
15. Russian Economic Trends. 1998;Blackwell, London. II Quarterly.
16. Shleifer A. Government in transition. European Economic Review. 41:(3):1997;385-410.
17. Treisman D. The politics of intergovernmental transfers in post-Soviet Russia. British Journal of Political Science. 26:1996;299-335.
18. Treisman D. Fiscal redistribution in a fragile federation: Moscow and the regions in 1994. 1996;Harvard University. Mimeo.
19. Treisman D. Deciphering Russia's federal finance: fiscal appeasement on 1995 and 1996. 1997;UCLA. Mimeo.
20. Wong C.P. Financing Local Government in The People's Republic of China. 1997.