Optimization and model reduction in the high dimensional parameter space of a budding yeast cell cycle model

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Oguz, Cihan ^a   Laomettachit, Teeraphan ^b   Chen, Katherine C ^a   Watson, Layne T ^a   Baumann, William T ^c   Tyson, John J ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KING MONGKUT'S UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY THONBURI   (Thailand)

^c State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Budding yeast; Cell cycle; Differential evolution; Latin hypercube sampling; Model reduction; ODE model; Optimization; Phenotype competition; Phenotypic constraints; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CYCLE; CYTOLOGY; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCETALES; TIME;

ALGORITHMS; CELL CYCLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCETALES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84879455542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-53     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hlavacek WS. How to deal with large models?. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:240. 2644176, 19156132.
2. Alon U. An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits (Chapman & Hall/CRC Mathematical & Computational Biology) 2006, London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
3. Hood L, Heath J, Phelps M, Lin B. Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine. Science 2004, 306(5696):640-643. 10.1126/science.1104635, 15499008.
4. Kitano H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295(5560):1662-1664. 10.1126/science.1069492, 11872829.
5. Tyson JJ, Chen K, Novak B. Network dynamics and cell physiology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2(12):908-916. 10.1038/35103078, 11733770.
6. April J, Glover F, Kelly JP, Laguna M. Simulation-based optimization: practical introduction to simulation optimization. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference: December 7-10 2003; New Orleans, Louisiana 2003, 71-78.
7. Sun J, Garibaldi JM, Hodgman C. Parameter estimation using metaheuristics in systems biology: a comprehensive review. IEEE-ACM T Comput Bi 2012, 9(1):185-202.
8. Price KV, Storn RM, Lampinen JA. Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization 2005, Natural Computing Series, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Villaverde AF, Egea JA, Banga JR. A cooperative strategy for parameter estimation in large scale systems biology models. BMC Syst Biol 2012, 6:75. 10.1186/1752-0509-6-75, 3512509, 22727112.
10. Bentele M, Lavrik I, Ulrich M, Stößer S, Heermann DW, Kalthoff H, Krammer PH, Eils R. Mathematical modeling reveals threshold mechanism in CD95-induced apoptosis. J Cell Biol 2004, 166(6):839-851. 10.1083/jcb.200404158, 2172102, 15364960.
11. Cho K, Shin S, Kolch W, Wolkenhauer O. Experimental design in systems biology, based on parameter sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo method: A case study for the TNF alpha-mediated NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway. Simul-T Soc Mod Sim 2003, 79(12):726-739.
12. van Riel NAW. Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-base experiments. Brief Bioinform 2006, 7(4):364-374. 10.1093/bib/bbl040, 17107967.
13. Apgar JF, Witmer DK, White FM, Tidor B. Sloppy models, parameter uncertainty, and the role of experimental design. Mol Biosyst 2010, 6(10):1890-1900. 10.1039/b918098b, 3505121, 20556289.
14. Degenring D, Froemel C, Dikta G, Takors R. Sensitivity analysis for the reduction of complex metabolism models. J Process Contr 2004, 14(7):729-745.
15. Morgan D. Cell Cycle 2006, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Chen KC, Calzone L, Csikasz-Nagy A, Cross FR, Novak B, Tyson JJ. Integrative analysis of cell cycle control in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15(8):3841-3862. 10.1091/mbc.E03-11-0794, 491841, 15169868.
17. Santner TJ, Williams B, Notz W. The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments 2003, New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Schmidt H, Madsen MF, Dano S, Cedersund G. Complexity reduction of biochemical rate expressions. Bioinformatics 2008, 24(6):848-854. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn035, 18267948.
19. Berthoumieux S, Brilli M, Kahn D, De Jong H, Cinquemani E. On the identifiability of metabolic network models. J Math Biol 2012, 1-38.
20. Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Bachmann J, Schilling M, Klingmueller U, Timmer J. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics 2009, 25(15):1923-1929. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358, 19505944.
21. Balsa-Canto E, Alonso AA, Banga JR. An iterative identification procedure for dynamic modeling of biochemical networks. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:11. 10.1186/1752-0509-4-11, 2838808, 20163703.
22. Chis OT, Banga JR, Balsa-Canto E. Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods. PLOS ONE 2011, 6(11):e27755. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027755, 3222653, 22132135.
23. Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Klingmueller U, Timmer J. Addressing parameter identifiability by model-based experimentation. IET Syst Biol 2011, 5(2):120-U78. 10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0061, 21405200.
24. Mitchison JM. The Biology of the Cell Cycle 1971, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Laomettachit T. Mathematical modeling approaches for dynamical analysis of protein regulatory networks with applications to the budding yeast cell cycle and the circadian rhythm in cyanobacteria. PhD thesis, Virginia Institute of Technology 2011, [http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11072011-021528/].
26. Budding Yeast Cell Cycle Homepage. [http://mpf.biol.vt.edu/research/budding_yeast_model/pp/].
27. Storn R. On the usage of differential evolution for function optimization. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society [NAFIPS '96], Berkeley, CA: IEEE 1996, 519-523.
28. Ma W, Lai L, Ouyang Q, Tang C. Robustness and modular design of the Drosophila segment polarity network. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2:270.
29. Yao G, Tan C, West M, Nevins JR, You L. Origin of bistability underlying mammalian cell cycle entry. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:485. 3101952, 21525871.
30. Ingolia NT, Murray AW. The ups and downs of modeling the cell cycle. Curr Biol 2004, 14(18):R771-R777. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.018, 15380091.
31. Lehar J, Krueger A, Zimmermann G, Borisy A. High-order combination effects and biological robustness. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:215. 2538911, 18682705.
32. Moriya H, Shimizu-Yoshida Y, Kitano H. In vivo robustness analysis of cell division cycle genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2006, 2(7):e111. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020111, 1500812, 16839182.
33. Cross FR, Schroeder L, Bean JM. Phosphorylation of the Sic1 inhibitor of B-type cyclins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not essential but contributes to cell cycle robustness. Genetics 2007, 176(3):1541-1555. 10.1534/genetics.107.073494, 1931548, 17483408.
34. Panning TD, Watson LT, Allen NA, Chen KC, Shaffer CA, Tyson JJ. Deterministic parallel global parameter estimation for a model of the budding yeast cell cycle. J Global Optim 2008, 40(4):719-738.