Tinnitus and event-related activity of the auditory cortex

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 300-331

  Hoke, Ellen S ^b   Mühlnickel, Werner ^a   Ross, Bernhard ^c   Hoke, Manfried ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Auditory evoked fields; Auditory evoked potentials; Contingent negative variation; Event related fields; Event related potentials; Magnetoencephalogram; Plasticity; Reorganization; Spectrotemporal analysis; Tinnitus

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TIME; TINNITUS; WAVEFORM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDITORY CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TINNITUS;

EID: 0031691826     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000013802     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Alho K, Teder W, Lavikainen J, Näätänen R: Strongly focused attention and auditory event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1994;38:73-90.
2. Allen JB, Rabiner LR: A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis and synthesis. Proc IEEE 1977; 65:1558-1564.
3. Annett M: The binomial distribution of right, mixed and left-handed. Q J Exp Psychol 1967;19:327-333.
4. Attias J, Bresloff I, Furman V, Urbach D: Auditory event related potentials in simulated tinnitus. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1995;6:173-183.
5. Attias J, Furman V, Shemesh Z, Bresloff I: Impaired brain processing in noise-induced tinnitus patients as measured by auditory and visual event-related potentials. Ear Hear 1996a;17:327-333.
6. Attias J, Pratt H, Reshef H, Bresloff I, Horowitz G, Polyakov A, Shemesh Z: Detailed analysis of auditory brainstem responses in patients with noise-induced tinnitus. Audiology 1996b;35:259-270.
7. Attias J, Urbach D, Gold S, Shemesh Z: Auditory event related potentials in chronic tinnitus patients with noise induced hearing loss. Hear Res 1993;71:106-113.
8. Axelsson A, Ringdahl A: The occurrence and severity of tinnitus: A prevalence study; in Feldman H (ed): Proc 3rd Int Tinnitus Semin. Karlsruhe, Harsch, 1987, pp 154-158.
9. Barnea G, Attias J, Gold S, Shahar A: Tinnitus with normal hearing sensitivity: Extended high-frequency audiometry and auditory-nerve brainstem-evoked responses. Audiology 1990;29:36-45.
10. Cassvan A, Ralescu S, Moshkovski FG, Shapiro E: Brainstem auditory evoked potential studies in patients with tinnitus and/or vertigo. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:583-586.
11. Cole HW, Ray WJ: EEG correlates of emotional tasks related to attentional demands. Int J Psychophysiol 1985;3:33-41.
12. Coles RRA: Epidemiology of tinnitus. 1. Prevalence. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 1984a;9:7-15.
13. Coles RRA: Epidemiology of tinnitus. 2. Demographic and clinical features. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 1984b;9:194-202.
14. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Særmark K: Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex: Influence of stimulus intensity. Scand Audiol 1981;10:203-207.
15. Elberling C, Bak C, Kofoed B, Lebech J, Særmark K: Auditory magnetic fields: Source localization and 'tonotopical organization' in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Scand Audiol 1982;11:61-65.
16. Elbert T, Rockstroh B, Hampson S, Pantev C, Hoke M: The magnetic counterpart of the contingent negative variation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:262-272.
17. Faucheux BA, Mantanus H, Gerono A, Timsit Berthier M: Relations entre rythmes rapides de l'EEG et variation contingente négative (VCN). Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin 1983;13:74-82.
18. Fowler EP: Head noises: Significance, measurement and importance in diagnosis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol 1940;32:903-914.
19. Gaillard AWK: Effects of warning-signal modality on the contingent negative variation (CNV). Biol Psychol 1976; 4:139-154.
20. Gerken GM: Central tinnitus and lateral inhibition: An auditory brainstem model. Hear Res 1996;97:75-83.
21. Giedke H, Bolz J: Pre- and post-imperative negative variation (CNV and PINV) under different conditions of controllability in depressed patients and healthy controls; in Kornhuber HH, Deecke L (eds): Motivation, Motor and Sensory Processes of the Brain: Electrical Potentials, Behaviour and Clinical Use. Prog Brain Res. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1980, pp 579-582.
22. Goldstein B: Psychophysical and psychoacoustic correlates of tinnitus; in Shulman A, Aran JM, Tonndorf J, Feldmann H, Vernon JA (eds): Tinnitus: Diagnosis/Treatment. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1991, pp 99-115.
23. Grossberg S: The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behavior: Speech, language, and motor control; in Grossberg S (ed): The Adaptive Brain. II: Vision, Speech, Language, and Motor Control. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1987, pp 313-400.
24. Gutierrez S, Corsi Cabrera M: EEG activity during performance of cognitive tasks demanding verbal and/or spatial processing. Int J Neurosci 1988;42:149-155.
25. Hamano T, Luders HO, Ikeda A, Collura TF, Comair YG, Shibasaki H: The cortical generators of the contingent negative variation in humans: A study with subdural electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;104:257-268.
26. Hansen JC, Hillyard SA: Selective attention to multidimensional auditory stimuli in man. J Exp Psychol (Hum Percept) 1980;9:1-19.
27. Harrison RV, Gordon DC, Nagasawa A, Stanton S, Ibrahim D, Mount RJ: Auditory evoked potentials in cats with neonatal high frequency hearing loss: Evidence of abnormal frequency representation in the midbrain. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993a;113:31-38.
28. Harrison RV, Nagasawa A, Smith DW, Stanton S, Mount RJ: Reorganization of auditory cortex after neonatal high frequency hearing loss. Hear Res 1991;54:11-19.
29. Harrison RV, Stanton SG, Ibrahim D, Nagaswa A, Mount RJ: Neonatal cochlear hearing loss results in developmental abnormalities of the central auditory pathways. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993b;113: 296-302.
30. Hazell JWP: A cochlear model for tinnitus; in Feldman H (ed): Proc 3rd Int Tinnitus Semin, Münster, Germany. Karlsruhe, Harsch, 1987, pp 121-128.
31. Hoke ES, Hoke M, Ross B: Neurophysiological correlate of the auditory after-image ('Zwicker tone'). Audiol Neurootol 1996;1:161-174.
32. Hoke M: Auditory evoked magnetic fields: in Basar E (ed): Dynamics of Sensory and Cognitive Processing by the Brain. Springer Series in Brain Dynamics. Berlin, Springer, 1988, pp 311-318.
33. Hoke M, Feldmann H, Pantev C, Lütkenhöner B, Lehnertz K: Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear Res 1989a;37:281-286.
34. Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C: Cortical auditory evoked magnetic fields: Mapping of time and frequency domain aspects; in Maurer K (ed): Topographic Brain Mapping of EEC and Evoked Potentials. Berlin, Springer, 1989b, pp 537-564.
35. Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Pantev C, Lütkenhöner B: Spatiotemporal aspects of synergetic processes in the auditory cortex as revealed by the magnetoencephalogram; in Basar E, Bullock T (eds): Dynamics of Cognitive and Sensory Processing in the Brain. Springer Series in Brain Dynamics. Berlin, Springer, 1989c, pp 84-105.
36. Hoke M, Pantev C, Lütkenhöner B, Lehnertz K: Auditory cortical basis of tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1991;491:176-182.
37. Hoke M, Wickesberg RE, Lütkenhöner B: Time- and intensity-dependent low-pass filtering of auditory brain stem responses. Audiology 1984;23: 195-205.
38. Ikemi A: Psychophysiological effects of self-regulation method: EEG frequency analysis and contingent negative variations. Psychother Psychosom 1988;49:230-239.
39. Ikner CL, Hassen AH: The effect of tinnitus on ABR latencies. Ear Hear 1990;11:16-20.
40. Jacobson GP, Ahmad BK, Moran J, Newman CW, Tepley N, Wharton J: Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100-M200) measurement in tinnitus and normal groups. Hear Res 1991;56:44-52.
41. Jastreboff P, Ikner CL, Hassen A: An approach to the objective evaluation of tinnitus in humans; in Aran JM, Dauman R (eds): Tinnitus '91. Amsterdam, Kugler, 1992, pp 331-339.
42. Jastreboff PJ: Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): Mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990;8:221-254
43. Jastreboff PJ, Hazell JWP: A neurophysiological approach to tinnitus: Clinical implications. Br J Audiol 1993; 27:7-17.
44. Klein C, Rockstroh B, Cohen R, Berg P: Contingent negative variation (CNV) and determinants of the post-imperative negative variation (PINV) in schizophrenic patients and healthy controls. Schizophr Res 1996;21:97-110.
45. Kumpf W: Latencies of reaction indicating disturbed behaviour during evaluation of pure tone threshold. Laryngol Rhinol 1981;60:259-263.
46. de Lavernhe Lemaire MC, Beutter P: Potentials évoqués auditifs dans la distinction entre acouphènes périphériques et centraux. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 1989;97:135-144.
47. de Lavernhe Lemaire MC, Beutter P: Modifications des amplitudes des potentiels évoqués auditifs précoces observées dans les acouphènes. Arch Int Physiol Biochim 1990;98:403-409.
48. de Lavernhe Lemaire MC, Beutter P: Le système efférent auditif peut-il être exploré par les potentiels évoqués précoces? Premiers résultats chez le normal et les porteurs d'acouphènes. Arch Int Physiol Biochim Biophys 1991;99:435-439.
49. de Lavernhe Lemaire MC, Beutter P: Système efférent latéral et potentiels évoqués auditifs: Réponse des porteurs d'acouphènes. Arch Physiol Biochem 1995;103:79-86.
50. Levi H, Chisin R: Can tinnitus mask hearing? A comparison between subjective audiometric and objective electrophysiological thresholds in patients with tinnitus. Audiology 1987;26:153-157.
51. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Coad ML, Towsley ML, Wack DS, Murphy BW: The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus: Evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity. Neurology 1998;50:114-120.
52. Loveless N, Sanford AJ: Slow potential correlated of preparatory set. Biol Psychol 1974;1:303-314.
53. McCallum WC: Potentials related to expectancy, preparation and motor activity; in Picton TW (ed): Human Event-Related Potentials. EEG Handbook 3. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1988, pp 427-534.
54. McKee GJ, Stephens SD: An investigation of normally hearing subjects with tinnitus. Audiology 1992;31: 313-317.
55. Mäkelä JP, Ahonen A, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R, Kajola M, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV, McEvoy L, Salmelin R: Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole-head neuromagnetic recordings. Hum Brain Mapping 1993;1: 48-56.
56. Mantanus H, Timsit Berthier M, Faucheux B: Y a-t-il une corrélation entre les phases de la VCN et le spectre de puissance de l'EEG? Rev Electroencephalogr Neurophysiol Clin 1984;14:97-102.
57. Maurizi M, Ottaviani F, Paludetti G, Almadori G, Tassoni A: Contribution to the differentiation of peripheral versus central tinnitus via auditory brain stem response evaluation. Audiology 1985;24:207-216.
58. Michie PT, Bearpark HM, Crawford JM, Glue LC: The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials. Biol Psychol 1990;30:219-250.
59. Møller AR: Can injury to the auditory nerve cause tinnitus? in Feldmann H (ed): Proc 3rd Int Tinnitus Semin, Münster, Harsch, 1987, pp 58-63.
60. Møller AR, Møller MB, Jannetta PJ, Jho HD: Compound action potentials recorded from the exposed eighth nerve in patients with intractable tinnitus. Laryngoscope 1992;102: 187-197.
61. Näätänen R: Selective attention and evoked potentials. Ann Acad Sci Fennic B 1967;151:1-226.
62. Näätänen R, Picton T: The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987;24:375-425.
63. Näätänen R, Teder W: Attention effects on the auditory event-related potential. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl Stockh 1991;491:161-166.
64. Näätänen R, Teder W, Alho K, Lavikainen J: Auditory attention and selective input modulation: A topographical ERP study. Neuroreport 1992;3:493-496.
65. Nashmi R, Mendonca AJ, MacKay WA: EEG rhythms of the sensorimotor region during hand movements. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;91:456-467.
66. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencophalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:160-170.
67. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lütkenhöner B, Lehnertz K, Kumpf W: Tinnitus remission objectified by neuromagnetic measurements. Hear Res 1989;40: 261-264.
68. Pantev C, Ross B, Berg P, Elbert T, Rockstroh B: Study of the human auditory cortices using a whole-head magnetometer: Left vs. right hemisphere and ipsi-vs. contralateral stimulation. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:183-190.
69. Pierson A, Ragot R, Ripoche A, Lesevre N: Electrophysiological changes elicited by auditory stimuli given a positive or negative value: A study comparing anhedonic with hedonic subjects. Int J Psychophysiol 1987;5: 107-123.
70. Puel JL: Chemical synaptic transmission in the cochlea. Prog Neurobiol 1995;47:449-476.
71. Rajan R, Irvine DRF: Neuronal responses across cortical field A1 in plasticity induced by peripheral auditory damage. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:123-144.
72. Rajan R, Irvine DRF, Wise LZ, Heil P: Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1993;338:17-49.
73. Ray WJ, Cole HW: EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science 1985; 228:750-752.
74. Reite M, Zimmerman JT, Edrich J, Zimmerman JE: Auditory evoked magnetic fields: Response amplitude vs. stimulus intensity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;54:147-152.
75. Robertson D, Irvine D: Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness. J Comp Neurol 1989; 282:456-471.
76. Rockstroh B, Cohen R, Berg P, Klein C: The postimperative negative variation following ambiguous matching of auditory stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 1997;25:155-167.
77. Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Canavan A, Lutzenberger W, Birbaumer N: Slow Cortical Potentials and Behaviour. Baltimore, Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1989.
78. Rosenhall U, Axelsson A: Auditory brainstem response latencies in patients with tinnitus. Scand Audiol 1995;24:97-100.
79. Saermark K, Mikkelsen KB: Auditory evoked magnetic fields: Analysis of the N100/P200 signal. Physiol Meas 1993;14:A69-73.
80. Schafer RW, Rabiner LR: Design and simulation of a speech analysis-synthesis system based on short-time Fourier analysis. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 1973;21:165-174.
81. Schwaber MK, Garraghty PE, Kaas JH: Neuroplasticity of the adult primate auditory cortex following cochlear hearing loss. Am J Otol 1993;14: 252-258.
82. Shiraishi T, Sugimoto K, Kubo T, Matsunaga T, Nageishi Y, Simokochi M: Contingent negative variation enhancement in tinnitus patients. Am J Otolaryngol 1991;12:267-271.
83. Szczepaniak WS, Møller AR: Effects of (-)-baclofen, clonazepam, and diazepam on tone exposure-induced hyperexcitability of the inferior colliculus in the rat: Possible therapeutic implications for pharmacological management of tinnitus and hyperacusis. Hear Res 1996;97:46-53.
84. Teder W, Alho K, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R: Interstimulus interval and the selective-attention effect on auditory ERPs: 'N1 enhancement' versus processing negativity. Psychophysiology 1993;30:71-81.
85. Tonndorf J: Stereociliary dysfunction, a cause of sensory hearing loss, recruitment, poor speech discrimination and tinnitus. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1981;91:469-479.
86. Tonndorf J: The analogy between tinnitus and pain: A suggestion for a physiological basis of chronic tinnitus. Hear Res 1987;28:271-275.
87. Tonndorf J: The origin of tinnitus; in Shulman A, Aran JM, Tonndorf J, Feldmann H, Vernon JA (eds): Tinnitus: Diagnosis/Treatment. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1991, pp 41-49.
88. Walter WG, Cooper R, Aldridge VJ, McCallum WC, Winter AL: Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964;203:380-384.
89. Wollbrink A: Ein computergestütztes Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Lautheit und Tonhöhe von Ohrgeräuschen. Fachhochschule Jülich, 1994.
90. Woods DL, Alho K, Algazi A: Stages of auditory feature conjunction: An event-related brain potential study. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994;20:81-94.
91. Zwicker E: 'Negative afterimage' in hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1964;36: 2413-2415.