Statistical torsion angle potential energy functions for protein structure modeling: A bicubic interpolation approach

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 81, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1156-1165

  Kim, Tae Rae ^a   Yang, Joshua Sungwoo ^b,c   Shin, Seokmin ^a   Lee, Jinhyuk ^b,c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

^c University of Science and Technology (UST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bicubic interpolation; Statistical potential; Structure modeling; Torsion angle

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ENERGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL TORSION ANGLE POTENTIAL ENERGY FUNCTION;

ALGORITHMS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84879422145     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24265     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ramachandran GN, Ramakrishnan C, Sasisekharan V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J Mol Biol 1963;7:95-99.
2. Davis IW, Leaver-Fay A, Chen VB, Block JN, Kapral GJ, Wang X, Murray LW, Arendall WB, III, Snoeyink J, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucl Acids Res 2007;35(Web Server issue):W375-383.
3. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallgr 1993;26:283-291.
4. Mackerell AD, Jr., Feig M, Brooks CL, III.Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1400-1415.
5. MacKerell AD, Jr., Feig M, Brooks CL, III.Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:698-699.
6. Nishikawa K, Matsuo Y. Development of pseudoenergy potentials for assessing protein 3-D-1-D compatibility and detecting weak homologies. Prot Eng 1993;6:811-820.
7. Kocher JP, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Factors influencing the ability of knowledge-based potentials to identify native sequence-structure matches. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1598-1613.
8. Amir ED, Kalisman N, Keasar C. Differentiable, multi-dimensional, knowledge-based energy terms for torsion angle probabilities and propensities. Proteins 2008;72:62-73.
9. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Improving the quality of NMR and crystallographic protein structures by means of a conformational database potential derived from structure databases. Prot Sci 1996;5:1067-1080.
10. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM. Improvements and extensions in the conformational database potential for the refinement of NMR and X-ray structures of proteins and nucleic acids. J Magn Reson 1997;125:171-177.
11. Kuszewski J, Clore GM. Sources of and solutions to problems in the refinement of protein NMR structures against torsion angle potentials of mean force. J Magn Reson 2000;146:249-254.
12. Clore GM, Kuszewski J.Chi(1) rotamer populations and angles of mobile surface side chains are accurately predicted by a torsion angle database potential of mean force. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124:2866-2867.
13. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
14. Yang JS, Kim J-h, Oh S, Han G, Lee S, Lee J. STAP Refinement of the NMR database: a database of 2405 refined solution NMR structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40(Database issue):D525-530.
15. Kim T-R, Ji S, Lee S, Chu I-S, Shin S, Lee J. A hybrid modeling strategy using nuclear overhauser effect data with contact information. Chem Phys Lett 2012;554:190-194.
16. Kim T-R, Oh S, Yang JS, Lee S, Shin S, Lee J. A simplified homology-model builder toward highly protein-like structures: an inspection of restraining potentials. J Comput Chem 2012;33:1927-1935.
17. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
18. Srinivasan R, Rose GD. A physical basis for protein secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:14258-14263.
19. Cheng J. A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling. BMC Struct Biol 2008;8:18.
20. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Söding J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods 2012;9:173-175.
21. MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott Dunbrack, RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith JC, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:3586-3616.
22. Brooks BR, Brooks CL, III, Mackerell AD, Jr., Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, Won Y, Archontis G, Bartels C, Boresch S, Caflisch A, Caves L, Cui Q, Dinner AR, Feig M, Fischer S, Gao J, Hodoscek M, Im W, Kuczera K, Lazaridis T, Ma J, Ovchinnikov V, Paci E, Pastor RW, Post CB, Pu JZ, Schaefer M, Tidor B, Venable RM, Woodcock HL, Wu X, Yang W, York DM, Karplus M:CHARMM the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009;30:1545-1614.
23. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:10915-10919.
24. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
25. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
26. Hooft RW, Vriend G, Sander C, Abola EE. Errors in protein structures. Nature 1996;381:272.
27. Shen M-, Sali A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Prot Sci 2006;15:2507-2524.
28. Yang Y, Zhou Y. Specific interactions for ab initio folding of protein terminal regions with secondary structures. Proteins 2008;72:793-803.
29. Chen J, Im W, Brooks CL, III.Application of torsion angle molecular dynamics for efficient sampling of protein conformations. J Comput Chem 2005;26:1565-1578.
30. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Jr., Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983;220:671-680.
31. Sugita YO, Y. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 1999;314:141-151.
32. Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 1949;44:335-341.
33. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 1953;21:1087-1092.
34. Li Z, Scheraga HA. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:6611-6615.
35. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they?. J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-469.
36. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999;292:195-202.