Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1273-1278

  Saragaglia, Dominique ^a   Bonnin, Michel ^b   Dejour, David ^c   Deschamps, Gérard ^d   Chol, Christophe ^d   Chabert, Benoit ^a   Refaie, Ramsay ^e  

^a GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Centre Orthopédique Santy 24 Avenue Paul Santy ^*  (France)

^c Lyon Ortho Clinic Clinique Sauvegarde   (France)

^d Ctr Orthopedique Medico Chirurgical   (France)

^e WANSBECK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; BONE NECROSIS; CHONDROCALCINOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE EXACERBATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; OSTEOPHYTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; POSITIONING DEVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SYMPOSIUM; TIBIA; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84879420667     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1915-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ, Murray DW (2010) A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1628-1631
2. Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Remes V (2007) Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 78:128-135
3. O'Donnell T, Neil MJ (2010) The Repicci II® unicondylar knee arthroplasty: 9-year survivorship and function. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3094-3102
4. Whittaker JP, Naudie DD, McAuley JP, McCalden RW, McDonald SJ, Bourne RB (2010) Does bearing design influence midterm survivorship of unicompartmental arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:73-81
5. Sundberg M, Lidgren L, Dahl AW, Robertson O (2011) The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual report 2011. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/ online/thePages/contact.php
6. Tomkins A (2011) Australian Orthopaedic Association. National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual report 2011. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/publications.jsp
7. Argenson JN, Parratte S (2006) The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:137-142
8. Epinette JA (1998) Résultats des séries cliniques des prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. In: Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. Cahier d'enseignement de la SOFCOT n 65. Elsevier, Paris, pp 297-304
9. Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174-179
10. Epinette JA, Manley MT (2008) Is hydroxyapatite a reliable fixation option in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A 5- to 13-year experience with the hydroxyapatite-coated Unix prosthesis. J Knee Surg 21:299-306
11. Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:1137-1143. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0869-z
12. Epinette JA, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P, Mole D, Cazenave A, French Society for Hip and Knee (2012) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty modes of failure: wear is not the main reason for failure: a multicentre study of 418 failed knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(6 Suppl):S124-S130. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.002
13. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167-175
14. Kingler HM, Baums MH, Spahn G, Ernstberger T (2005) A study of effectiveness of knee arthroscopy after knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopy 21:731-738
15. Tinius M, Klima S, Marquass B, Tinius W, Josten C (2006) Revision possibilities after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty - an analysis of 116 revisions. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144:367-372
16. Lustig S, Servien E, Neyret P, Pereira H (2008) An original indication for BiUnicondylar knee arthroplasty: subsequent contralateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty after degenerative changes of the opposite compartment. Tech Knee Surg 7:240-250
17. Barrett WP, Scott RD (1987) Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328-1335
18. Padgett DE, Stern SH, Insall JN (1991) Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:186-190
19. Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Lewold S (1992) Multicenter study of unicompartmental knee revision. PCA, Marmor, and St Georg compared in 3,777 cases of arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 63:256-259
20. Lai CH, Rand JA (1993) Revision of failed unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:193-201
21. Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1998) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 13:191-196
22. Böhm I, Landsiedl F (2000) Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 35 cases. J Arthroplasty 15:982-989
23. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279-282
24. Miller M, Benjamin JB, Marson B, Hollstein S (2002) The effect of implant constraint on results of conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 25:1353-1357
25. Châtain F, Richard A, Deschamps G, Chambat P, Neyret P (2004) Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop 90:49-54
26. Saragaglia D, Estour G, Nemer C, Colle PE (2009) Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results. Int Orthop 33:969-974. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0585-0
27. Järvenpää J, Kettunen J, Miettinen H, Kröger H (2010) The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients (2010). Int Orthop 34:649-653. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0811-4