The Repicci II® unicondylar knee arthroplasty: 9-year survivorship and function

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3094-3102

  O'Donnell, Turlough ^a,b,c   Neil, Michael J ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT'S CLINIC   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FACE PAIN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMARTHROSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND INFECTION; AUSTRALIA; CONVALESCENCE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; NEW SOUTH WALES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77957707983     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1474-6     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. S Ahlback 1968 Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 277 suppl 7 72
2. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
3. R Altman E Asch D Bloch G Bole D Borenstein K Brandt W Christy TD Cooke R Greenwald M Hochberg, et al. 1986 Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association Arthritis Rheum. 29 1039 1049 1:STN:280: DyaL283psF2msQ%3D%3D 10.1002/art.1780290816 3741515
4. S Ansari D Warwick CE Ackroyd JH Newman 1997 Incidence of fatal pulmonary embolism after 1,390 knee arthroplasties without routine prophylactic anticoagulation, except in high-risk cases J Arthroplasty. 12 599 602 1:STN:280:DyaK2svltFagsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90131-5 9306209 (Pubitemid 27427937)
5. JN Argenson Y Chevrol-Benkeddache JM Aubaniac 2002 Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84 2235 2239 12473714
6. DJ Beard H Pandit HS Gill D Hollinghurst CA Dodd DW Murray 2007 The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 89 1597 1601 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sjis1ehtQ%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19259 18057359 (Pubitemid 351183410)
7. KR Berend AV Lombardi Jr 2007 Liberal indications for minimally invasive Oxford unicondylar arthroplasty provide rapid functional recovery and pain relief Surg Technol Int. 16 193 197 17429788
8. JM Bert 1998 10-year survivorship of metal-backed, unicompartmental arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 13 901 905 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FpsVOqsA%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90197-8 9880183 (Pubitemid 29016799)
9. T Borus T Thornhill 2008 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 16 9 18 18180388
10. LV Carlsson BE Albrektsson LR Regnér 2006 Minimally invasive surgery vs conventional exposure using the Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized radiostereometric study J Arthroplasty. 21 151 156 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.014 16520199 (Pubitemid 43339865)
11. A Carr G Keyes R Miller J O'Connor J Goodfellow 1993 Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee Clin Orthop Relat Res. 295 205 213 8403650
12. P Cartier JL Sanouiller RP Grelsamer 1996 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period J Arthroplasty. 11 782 788 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FovVekuw%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80177-X 8934317
13. RH Emerson Jr LL Higgins 2004 A comparison of highly instrumented and minimally instrumented unicompartmental knee prostheses Clin Orthop Relat Res. 428 153 157 10.1097/01.blo.0000147698.73764.97 15534536 (Pubitemid 39506167)
14. RH Emerson Jr LL Higgins 2008 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 118 122 10.2106/JBJS.F.00739 18171965
15. DA Fisher M Watts KE Davis 2003 Implant position in knee surgery: a comparison of minimally invasive open unicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 18 7 suppl 1 2 8 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00291-2 14560403 (Pubitemid 37259658)
16. GR Hanson AL Moynihan JF Suggs YM Kwon T Johnson G Li 2009 Kinematics of medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty: an in vivo investigation J Knee Surg. 22 237 242 10.1055/s-0030-1247755 19634728
17. J Insall P Aglietti 1980 A 5- to 7-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 62 1329 1337 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FmvF2gtQ%3D%3D 7440612
18. J Insall LD Dorr RD Scott RN Scott 1989 Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system Clin Orthop Relat Res. 248 13 14 2805470
19. K Knutson S Lewold O Robertsson L Lidgren 1994 The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a nationwide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992 Acta Orthop Scand. 65 375 386 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fms1Orsw%3D%3D 10.3109/17453679408995475 7976280
20. E Koskinen A Eskelinen P Paavolainen P Pulkkinen V Remes 2008 Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register Acta Orthop. 79 499 507 10.1080/17453670710015490 18766483
21. E Koskinen P Paavolainen A Eskelinen A Harilainen J Sandelin P Ylinen K Tallroth V Remes 2009 Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with Miller-Galante II prosthesis: mid-term clinical and radiographic results Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 129 617 624 10.1007/s00402-008-0670-2 18560850
22. SC Kozinn R Scott 1989 Unicondylar knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 71 145 150 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7gvFansw%3D%3D 2643607
23. A Kumar NJ Fiddian 1999 Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee Knee. 6 21 23 10.1016/S0968-0160(98)00006-4 (Pubitemid 29012697)
24. K Larsen OG Sorensen TB Hansen PB Thomsen K Soballe 2008 Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: a randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-up Acta Orthop. 79 149 159 10.1080/17453670710014923 18478482 (Pubitemid 351878344)
25. RS Laskin 1978 Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 60 182 185 1:STN:280:DyaE1c7ltV2rsQ%3D%3D 641081
26. CT Laurencin SB Zelicof RD Scott FC Ewald 1991 Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: a comparative study Clin Orthop Relat Res. 273 151 156 1959264
27. Lidgren L. Swedish knee arthroplasty register: 2002 annual report. Available at: www.ort.lu.se/knee. Accessed April 1, 2010.
28. W Macaulay RS Yoon 2008 Fixed-bearing, medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty rapidly improves function and decreases pain: a prospective, single-surgeon outcomes study J Knee Surg. 21 279 284 18979929
29. CM McAllister 2008 The role of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in providing maximal performance and satisfaction J Knee Surg. 21 286 292 18979931
30. AB Mullaji A Sharma S Marawar 2007 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional recovery and radiographic results with a minimally invasive technique J Arthroplasty. 22 7 11 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.109 17570269 (Pubitemid 47001300)
31. PE Müller C Pellengahr M Witt J Kircher HJ Refior V Jansson 2004 Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty. 19 296 301 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.013 15067640 (Pubitemid 38519820)
32. DW Murray AR Britton CJ Bulstrode 1997 Loss to follow-up matters J Bone Joint Surg Br. 79 254 257 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3jsVOkug%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.79B2. 6975 9119852 (Pubitemid 27135386)
33. J Newman RV Pydsietty C Ackroyd 2009 Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91 52 57 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M%2FjvVCltg%3D%3D 19092004
34. JH Newman CE Ackroyd NA Shah 1998 Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five year results of a prospective, randomized trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br. 80 862 865 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvjvFygtw%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.80B5.8835 9768899 (Pubitemid 28457081)
35. DW Pennington JJ Swienckowski WB Lutes GN Drake 2003 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85 1968 1973 14563806
36. AJ Price JC Waite U Svard 2005 Long-term clinical results of the medial oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res. 435 171 180 10.1097/00003086-200506000-00024 15930935 (Pubitemid 40798659)
37. MR Romanowski JA Repicci 2002 Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up J Knee Surg. 15 17 22 11829329
38. NF Soohoo H Sharifi G Kominski JR Lieberman 2006 Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88 1975 1982 10.2106/JBJS.E.00597 16951114 (Pubitemid 44352744)
39. CA Willis-Owen K Brust H Alsop M Miraldo JP Cobb 2009 Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome, and cost efficacy Knee. 16 473 478 10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006 19464898