An original indication for biunicondylar knee antroplasty: Subsequent contralateral unicondylar knee arthroplasty after degenerative changes of the opposite compartment

Techniques in Knee Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 240-250

  Lustig, Sebastien ^a   Servien, Elvire ^a   Neyret, Philippe ^a   Pereira, Hélder ^b  

^a Croix Rousse Hospital   (France)

^b HOSPITAL DE SANTO ANTÓNIO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Arthritis; BiUKA; Hypocorrection; Knee; Unicondylar

Indexed keywords

LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPATHY; ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; BIUNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRALATERAL UNICONDYLAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; COST; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANT; JOINT DEGENERATION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 67649592370     PISSN: 15360636     EISSN: 15381935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTK.0b013e31818f8d31     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Marmor L. Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee with a minimum ten-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop. 1988; 228:171-177.
2. Cartier P, Chaib S, Vanvooren P. Unicompartmental prosthetic replacement of the knee. Apropos of 159 cases - a maximum follow-up period of 10 years. Rev Chir Orthop. 1987;73:130-133.
3. Berger R, Meneghini M, Jacobs J, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:999-1006.
4. Robertson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, et al. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 Primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70: 170-175.
5. Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin L, et al. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly, low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2348-2355.
6. Newman J. Why do I do so many unicompartmental knee replacements? La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2004:287-292.
7. Servien E, Tarik A, Neyret Ph, et al. How to select candidates for lateral unicompartmental prosthesis. Tech Knee Surg. 2007;6:51-59.
8. Böhm I, Landsiedl F. Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 35 cases. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:982-989.
9. Chatain F, Richard A, Deschamps G. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop. 2004;9:49-57.
10. Banks S, Fregly B, Boniforti F, et al. Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:551-556.
11. Soohoo N, Sharifi H, Kominski G, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1975-1982.
12. Neyret P, Daher A. Prothése unicompartimentale. In: Neyret P, Verdonk P, Tarik S, eds. Chirurgie du genou: "My Knee Practice." Paris, France: Masson; 2007:153-162.
13. Hernigou P, Deschamps G. Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1132-1137.
14. Yercan H, Tarik A, Neyret P. The treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis with partial lateral facetectomy. Clin Orthop. 2005;436:14-19.
15. Irrgang J, Anderson A, Boland A, et al. Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-613.
16. International Knee Documentation Committee. IKDC Evaluation Form. Available at: www.sportsmed.org/research/ docs/IKDC.pdf; www.esska.org/pdf/ IKDCeng.pdf.
17. Iwano T, Kurosawa H, Tokuyama H, et al. Roentgenographic and clinical findings of patellofemoral osteoarthrosis, with special reference to its relationship to femorotibial osteoarthrosis and etiological factors. Clin Orthop. 1990;252:190-197.
18. Levigne Ch. Intérêt de l'axe épiphysaire dans l'arthrose. Analyse du groupe Témoin. In: Les gonarthroses. Monographies 7émes Journées Lyonnaises. Lyon, France; 1991;7:142-168.
19. Jenny J, Boéri C, Ballonzi L, et al. Difficulties and reproducibility of radiological measurement of the proximal tibial axis according to Lévigne [Article in French]. Rev Chir Orthop. 2005;91:658-663.
20. Meneghini M, Hanssen A. The infected total knee replacement. In: Insall JN, Scott WN, eds. Surgery of the Knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone; 2006:2:1761-1781.
21. Spiritus T, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, et al. Diagnostic characteristics of a gelatin based Waaler-Rose assay (Serodia-RA) for the detection of rheumatoid factor. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63;1169-1171.
22. Pelosi E, Baiocco C, Pennone M, et al. 99 mc Tc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy in patients with symptomatic total hip or knee arthroplasty: improved diagnostic accuracy by means of semiquantitative evaluation. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:438-444.
23. Scott D, Chew M. The use of scintigraphy to detect increased osseous metabolic activity about the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1388-1406.
24. Fahey F, Webber R, Chew F, et al. Application of TACT to the evaluation of total joint arthroplasty. Med Phys. 2003;30:454-460.
25. Kinzel V, Scaddan M, Bradley B, et al. Varus/valgus alignment of the femur in total knee arthroplasty. Can accuracy be improved by pre-operative CT scanning? Knee. 2004;11:197-201.
26. Verdonk R, Meire D, van de Velde C, et al. CT scan of the knee: correlation with clinical and arthroscopic findings. Acta Orthop Belg. 1991;57(suppl 1):49-55.
27. Servien E, Neyret P, Deschamps G. Prothèses unicompartimentales: prothèse condylienne de resurfaçage. In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2004:263-266.
28. Insall J, Dorr L, Scott R, et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop. 1989;248:13-14.
29. Robertson O. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register - the present situation. In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2006:171-174.
30. Deschamps G, Lapeyre B. Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a frequently unrecognized cause of failure of unicompartmental knee prostheses [Article in French]. Rev Chir Orthop. 1987;73:544-551.
31. Argenson J, Komistek R, Aubaniac J, et al. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:1049-1054.
32. Deschamps G, Cartier P. Echecs et modalités de reprises des prosthèses unicompartimentales. In: Cartier P, Epinette J, Deschamps G, Hernigou P, eds. Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. Paris, France: Exp Scien Fr. 1998; 65:161-164.
33. Lewold S, Robertsson O. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69: 469-474.
34. Springer B, Scott R, Thornhill T. Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop. 2006;446:214-220.
35. Seil R, Claro R. UKA revision: literature and results. In: La prothèse du genou. Montpellier, France: Sauramps Medical; 2006:327-331.
36. Sah A, Scott R. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a medial approach. Study with an average five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89: 1948-1954.
37. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, et al. The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83:45-49.
38. Robinson B, Rees J, Price A, et al. Dislocation of the bearing of the Oxford lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty. A radiological assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:653-657.
39. Emerson R, Thomas H, Thomas R, et al. Comparison of a mobile with a fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee implant. Clin Orthop. 2002;404:62-70.
40. Picard F, Digioia A, Saragaglia D. La navigation informatique dans les prothéses totales du genou. In: Bonnin M, Chambat P, eds. La Gonarthrose - Traitement Chirurgical: De L'arthroscopie À La Prothèse. Paris, France: Springer; 2006:586-609.