Annotating the biomedical literature for the human variome

Database

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Verspoor, Karin ^a   Yepes, Antonio Jimeno ^a   Cavedon, Lawrence ^a,b   McIntosh, Tara ^c   Herten Crabb, Asha ^a   Thomas, Zoë ^a   Plazzer, John Paul ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c GOOGLE INC   (United States)

^d ROYAL MELBOURNE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA MINING; DISEASES; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS;

DATA MINING; DATABASES, GENETIC; DISEASE; GENETIC VARIATION; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84879387988     PISSN: 17580463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/database/bat019     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM®. McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, http://omim.org/ (27 March 2013, date last accessed).
2. Stenson,P., Ball,E., Howells,K. et al. (2009) The human gene mutation database: providing a comprehensive central mutation database for molecular diagnostics and personalized genomics. Hum. Genomics, 4, 69-72.
3. Claustres,M., Horaitis,O., Vanevski,M. et al. (2002) Time for a unified system of mutation description and reporting: a review of locus-specific mutation databases. Genome Res., 12, 680-688.
4. Baker,C.J.O. and Witte,R. (2006) Mutation mining-a prospector's tale. Inf. Syst. Front., 8, 47-57.
5. Caporaso,J.G., Baumgartner,W.A. Jr, Randolph,D.A. et al. (2007) MutationFinder: a high-performance system for extracting point mutation mentions from text. Bioinformatics, 23, 1862-1865.
6. Horn,F., Lau,A.L. and Cohen,F.E. (2004) Automated extraction of mutation data from the literature: application of MuteXt to G protein-coupled receptors and nuclear hormone receptors. Bioinformatics, 20, 557-568.
7. Kuipers,R., van den Bergh,T., Joosten,H.J. et al. (2010) Novel tools for extraction and validation of disease-related mutations applied to Fabry disease. Hum. Mutat, 31, 1026-1032.
8. Laurila,J.B., Naderi,N., Witte,R. et al. (2010) Algorithms and semantic infrastructure for mutation impact extraction and grounding. BMC Genomics, 11(Suppl 4), S24.
9. Naderi,N. and Witte,R. (2012) Automated extraction and semantic analysis of mutation impacts from the biomedical literature. BMC Genomics, 13(Suppl 4), S10-S10.
10. Doughty,E., Kertesz-Farkas,A., Bodenreider,O. et al. (2011) Toward an automatic method for extracting cancer- and other disease-related point mutations from the biomedical literature. Bioinformatics, 27, 408-415.
11. Lynch,H.T., Lynch,P.M., Lanspa,S.J. et al. (2009) Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications. Clin. Genet, 76, 1-18.
12. Peltomaki,P. and Vasen,H.F. (1997) Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: database and results of a collaborative study. The International Collaborative Group on Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology, 113, 1146-1158.
13. Ou,J., Niessen,R.C., Vonk,J. et al . (2008) A database to support the interpretation of human mismatch repair gene variants. Hum. Mutat, 29, 1337-1341.
14. Woods,M.O., Williams,P., Careen,A. et al. (2007) A new variant database for mismatch repair genes associated with Lynch syndrome. Hum. Mutat., 28, 669-673.
15. Fokkema,I.F.A.C., Taschner,P.E.M., Schaafsma,G.C.P. et al. (2011) LOVD v.2.0: the next generation in gene variant databases. Hum. Mutat., 32, 557-563.
16. Plon,S.E., Eccles,D.M., Easton,D. et al. (2008) Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum. Mutat., 29, 1282-1291.
17. Thompson,B.A., Goldgar,D.E., Paterson,C. et al. (2012) A multifactorial likelihood model for MMR gene variant classification incorporating probabilities based on sequence bioinformatics and tumor characteristics: a report from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Hum. Mutat., 34, 200-209.
18. Baumgartner,W.A. Jr, Cohen,K.B., Fox,L. et al . (2007) Manual curation is not sufficient for annotation of genomic databases. Bioinformatics, 23, i41-i48.
19. Hirschman,L., Burns,G.A.P.C., Krallinger,M. et al. (2012) Text mining for the biocuration workflow. Database, 2012, bas020.
20. Celli,J., Dalgleish,R., Vihinen,M. et al. (2012) Curating gene variant databases (LSDBs): toward a universal standard. Hum. Mutat., 33, 291-297.
21. Karamanis,N., Seal,R., Lewin,I. et al. (2008) Natural language processing in aid of FlyBase curators. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 193.
22. Verspoor,K., Cohen,KB. and Hunter,L. (2009) The textual characteristics of traditional and open access scientific journals are similar. BMC Bioinformatics, 10, 183.
23. Stenetorp,P., Pyysalo,S., Topic,G. et al. (2012) BRAT: A Web-based tool for NLP-assisted text annotation. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the Euro Chapter of the Assoc of Computational Linguistics (EACL). Association for Computational Linguistics, Avignon, France, pp. 102-107.
24. Cohen,J. (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 20, 37-46.
25. Hripcsak,G. and Rothschild,A.S. (2005) Agreement, the F-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 12, 296-298.
26. Wong,W., Martinez,D. and Cavedon,L. (2009) Extraction of named entities from tables in gene mutation literature. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on BioNLP, Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Boulder, CO, pp. 46-54.
27. Yarkoni,T., Poldrack,R.A., Nichols,T.E. et al. (2011) Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat. Methods, 8, 665-670.
28. McCray,A.T., Burgun,A. and Bodenreider,O. (2001) Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Stud. Health Technol. Inform., 84(Pt 1), 216-220.
29. Verspoor,K.M., Cohn,J.D., Ravikumar,K. et al. (2012) Text mining improves prediction of protein functional sites. PLoS One, 7, e32171.
30. Ravikumar,K.E., Liu,H., Cohn,J.D. et al. (2012) Literature mining protein-residue associations with graph rules learned through distant supervision. J. Biomed. Semantics, 3(Suppl 3), S2.
31. Verspoor,K., MacKinlay,A., Cohn,J.D. et al. (2013) Detection of protein catalytic sites in the biomedical literature. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 18, 433-444.
32. Leaman,R., Miller,C. and Gonzalez,G. (2009) Enabling recognition of diseases in biomedical text with machine learning: corpus and benchmark. In: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Languages in Biology and Medicine, South Korea.
33. Jimeno,A., Jimenez-Ruiz,E., Lee,V. et al. (2008) Assessment of disease named entity recognition on a corpus of annotated sentences. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 3), S3.
34. Tsuruoka,Y., Tateishi,Y., Kim,J.-D. et al. (2005) Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text, advances in informatics. In: Proceedings of the 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3746, Springer-Verlag, Volos, Greece, pp. 382-392.
35. Settles,B. (2005) ABNER: an open source tool for automatically tagging genes, proteins and other entity names in text. Bioinformatics, 21, 3191-3192.
36. Aronson,A.R. (2001) Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS metathesaurus: The MetaMap Program. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Symposium, pp. 17-21.
37. Aronson,A. and Lang,F. (2010) An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 17, 229-236.
38. Demner-Fushman,D. and Lin,J. (2007) Answering clinical questions with knowledge-based and statistical techniques. Comput. Linguist., 33, 63-103.
39. Kim,S.N., Martinez,D., Cavedon,L. et al. (2011) Automatic classification of sentences to support evidence based medicine. BMC Bioinformatics, 12(Suppl 2), S5.
40. Krallinger,M., Leitner,F., Rodriguez-Penagos,C. et al. (2008) Overview of the protein-protein interaction annotation extraction task of BioCreative II. Genome Biol., 9(Suppl 2), S4.
41. Kim,J.-D., Pyysalo,S., Ohta,T. et al. (2011) Overview of the BioNLP shared task 2011. In: Proceedings of the BioNLP Shared Task 2011 Workshop. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, OR, USA, pp. 1-6.
42. Cohen,K.B., Verspoor,K., Johnson,H.L. et al. (2011) High-precision biological event extraction: effects of system and of data. Comput. Intell., 27, 681-701.
43. Liu,H., Keselj,V., Blouin,C. et al. (2012) Subgraph matching-based literature mining for biomedical relations and events. In: AAAI Symposium on Information Retrieval and Knowledge Discovery in Biomedical Text. AAAI, Arlington, VA, USA, pp. 32-37.
44. Tong,M.Y., Cassa,C.A. and Kohane,I.S. (2011) Automated validation of genetic variants from large databases: ensuring that variant references refer to the same genomic locations. Bioinformatics, 27, 891-893.
45. Webb,E.A., Smith,T.D. and Cotton,R.G. (2011) Difficulties in finding DNA mutations and associated phenotypic data in web resources using simple, uncomplicated search terms, and a suggested solution. Hum. Genomics, 5, 141-155.
46. Wildeman,M., van Ophuizen,E., den Dunnen,J.T. et al. (2008) Improving sequence variant descriptions in mutation databases and literature using the Mutalyzer sequence variation nomenclature checker. Hum. Mutat., 29, 6-13.