Evaluations of Educational Interventions: Getting Them Published and Increasing Their Impact

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 77-80

  Olson, Curtis A ^a   Bakken, Lori L ^b  

^a Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONTINUING EDUCATION; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84879299553     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.21168     Document Type: Editorial

References (18)

1. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. Mar 2004;94(3):361-366.
2. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.02011: http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed March 12, 2013.
3. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintrye S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2006. http://www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance. Accessed February 22, 2013.
4. Chen HT. Practical Program Evaluation: Assessing and Improving Planning, Implementation, and Effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005.
5. Reznich CB, Anderson WA. A suggested outline for writing curriculum development journal articles: the IDCRD format. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13(1):4-8.
6. Ogrinc G, Mooney SE, Estrada C, et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration. Qual Saf Health Care. Oct 1, 2008;17:i13-i32.
7. Moskowitz JM. Preliminary guidelines for reporting outcome evaluation studies of health promotion and disease prevention programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation. 1989;43:101-112.
8. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. Apr 17, 2001;134(8):657-662.
9. Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. Jun 7, 2008;336(336):1281-1283.
10. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London, England: Sage; 1997.
11. Kitto SC, Bell M, Goldman J, et al. (Mis)perceptions of continuing education: insights from knowledge translation, quality improvement and patient safety leaders. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(2):81-88.
12. Morrison JM, Sullivan F, Murray E, Jolly B. Evidence-based education: development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions. Med Educ. Dec 1999;33(12):890-893.
13. Olson CA. Continuing education in the health professions, live conferences, and the grey literature. J Cont Educ Health Prof. 2013;33(1):1-3.
14. Bickman L. The functions of program theory. In: Bickman L, ed. Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation. Vol 33. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1987:5-18.
15. Fitzpatrick JL, Sanders JR, Worthen BR. Program Evaluation: Alternate Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2011.
16. Patton MQ. Evaluation of program implementation. Evaluation Studies Review Annual. 1979;4:318-346.
17. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. Sep 1999;89(9):1322-1327.
18. Gaglio B, Glasgow RE. Evaluation approaches for dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.