Impact of emerging clean vehicle system on water stress

Applied Energy

Volumn 111, Issue , 2013, Pages 644-651

  Cai, Hua ^a   Hu, Xiaojun ^b   Xu, Ming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Clean vehicles; System analysis; Transportation fuel; Water use

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; GAS EMISSIONS; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE GASES; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WATER SUPPLY;

ANNUAL WATER CONSUMPTION; MARKET PENETRATION; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; OPTIMIZATION MODELS; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT; WATER USE;

WATER RESOURCES;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CARBON EMISSION; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FOSSIL FUEL; GREENHOUSE GAS; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; WATER DEMAND; WATER RESOURCE; WATER STRESS; WATER USE;

EID: 84879267104     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.05.023     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chu S., Majumdar Arun Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 2012, 488:10.
2. 2 emissions. Appl Energy 2011, 88:2315-2323.
3. Demirbas A. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review. Appl Energy 2009, 86(Supplement 1):S108-S117.
4. US Congress. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007; 2007.
5. DOE. One million electric vehicles by 2015, February 2011 Status Report; 2011.
6. Wendt KLaM. Electric vehicle policies, fleet, and infrastructure: synthesis. WSDOT Research Office; 2011.
7. Center AFD Alternative fueling station locator 2012, U.S. Department of Energy.
8. Yang Y., Bae J., Kim J., Suh S. Replacing gasoline with corn ethanol results in significant environmental problem-shifting. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:3671-3678.
9. Dominguez-Faus R., Powers S.E., Burken J.G., Alvarez P.J. The water footprint of biofuels: a drink or drive issue?. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:3005-3010.
10. Chiu Y.-W., Walseth B., Suh S. Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:2688-2692.
11. Chiu Y.-W., Wu M. Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. Environ Sci Technol 2012.
12. Wu M., Mintz M., Wang M., Arora S. Consumptive water use in the production of ethanol and petroleum gasoline. Technical report 2009, Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
13. Argonne Developing a tool to estimate water use in electric power generation in the United Sates. Technical report 2010, Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
14. Harto C., Meyers R., Williams E. Life cycle water use of low-carbon transport fuels. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4933-4944.
15. King C.W., Webber M.E. Water intensity of transportation. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:7866-7872.
16. King C.W., Webber M.E. The water intensity of the plugged-in automotive economy. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:4305-4311.
17. Scown C.D., Horvath A., McKone T.E. Water footprint of US transportation fuels. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:2541-2553.
18. King C.W., Webber M.E., Duncan I.J. The water needs for LDV transportation in the United States. Energy Policy 2010, 38:1157-1167.
19. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2012 with Projections to 2035; 2012.
20. Farrell A.E., Plevin R.J., Turner B.T., et al. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 2006, 311:506-508.
21. Beckman J, Evans S, Sands, R. U.S. Renewable fuel standard 2: Impacts of cellulosic biofuel production. In: Agricultural and applied economics association 2011 annual meeting. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 2011.
22. Keshwani D.R., Cheng J.J. Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: a review. Bioresour Technol 2009, 100:1515-1523.
23. Manley D. The 90-Billion Gallon Biofuel Deployment Study; 2009.
24. Samaras C., Meisterling K. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:3170-3176.
25. DOT US. State Transportation, Statistics; 2010.
26. Pfister S., Koehler A., Hellweg S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:4098-4104.
27. Science and Technology to Support Fresh Water Availability in the United States. National science and technology council, committee on environment and natural resources, subcommittee on water availability and, quality; 2004.
28. Tetra Tech Inc. Evaluating sustainability of projected water demands under future climate change scenarios; 2010.
29. Brouwer A.S., Kuramochi T., van den Broek M., Faaij A. Fulfilling the electricity demand of electric vehicles in the long term future: an evaluation of centralized and decentralized power supply systems. Appl Energy 2013, 107:33-51.
30. Fernandes C., Frías P., Latorre J.M. Impact of vehicle-to-grid on power system operation costs: the Spanish case study. Appl Energy 2012, 96:194-202.
31. ORNL. US Billion-ton Update. Report for DOE; 2011.
32. Strogen B., Horvath A., McKone T.E. Fuel miles and the blend wall: costs and emissions from ethanol distribution in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 2012.
33. Marriott J., Matthews H.S. Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39:8584-8590.
34. USGS. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. In: 1344 USGSC (Editor); 2005.
35. EIA. State Energy Data System (SEDS); 2009.