Probing the lifetimes of auditory novelty detection processes

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 3145-3154

  Pegado, Felipe ^a,b   Bekinschtein, Tristan ^b,c   Chausson, Nicolas ^a   Dehaene, Stanislas ^b,d   Cohen, Laurent ^a,b,e   Naccache, Lionel ^a,b,e  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c MRC COGNITION AND BRAIN SCIENCES UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^d l'alimentation et l'Environnement   (France)

^e SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Audition; ERP; MMN; Novelty detection; P300; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY MEMORY; AUDITORY NOVELTY DETECTION; COGNITION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL LOBE; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SLEEP DEPRIVATION; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955278610     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.030     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Akatsuka K., Wasaka T., Nakata H., Kida T., Kakigi R. The effect of stimulus probability on the somatosensory mismatch field. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 181(4):607-614.
2. Arnott S.R., Alain C. Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location. Neuroreport 2002, 13(17):2209-2212.
3. Atienza M., Cantero J.L., Dominguez-Marin E. Mismatch negativity (MMN): An objective measure of sensory memory and long-lasting memories during sleep. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2002, 46(3):215-225.
4. Baillet S., Moscher J.C., Leahy R.M. Electromgnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing. Magazine 2001, 18:14-30.
5. Bekinschtein T.A., Dehaene S., Rohaut B., Tadel F., Cohen L., Naccache L. Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA 2009, 106(5):1672-1677.
6. Bledowski C., Prvulovic D., Hoechstetter K., Scherg M., Wibral M., Goebel R., et al. Localizing P300 generators in visual target and distractor processing: A combined event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(42):9353-9360.
7. Clarke J.M., Halgren E., Chauvel P. Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task. II. Temporal, parietal, and frontal recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology 1999, 110(7):1226-1244.
8. Czigler I., Csibra G. Event-related potentials and the identification of deviant visual stimuli. Psychophysiology 1992, 29(4):471-485.
9. Czigler I., Csibra G., Csontos A. Age and inter-stimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biology and Psychology 1992, 33(2-3):195-206.
10. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Cerebral specialization for speech and non-speech stimuli in infants. Journal of Cognition Neuroscience 2000, 12(3):449-460.
11. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dehaene S. Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature 1994, 370:292-295.
12. Dehaene S., Naccache L. Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition 2001, 79(1-2):1-37.
13. Doeller C.F., Opitz B., Mecklinger A., Krick C., Reith W., Schroger E. Prefrontal cortex involvement in preattentive auditory deviance detection: Neuroimaging and electrophysiological evidence. Neuroimage 2003, 20(2):1270-1282.
14. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1988, 11:355-372.
15. Ermutlu M.N., Demiralp T., Karamursel S. The effects of interstimulus interval on sensory gating and on preattentive auditory memory in the oddball paradigm. Can magnitude of the sensory gating affect preattentive auditory comparison process?. Neuroscience Letter 2007, 412(1):1-5.
16. Fischer C., Luaute J., Adeleine P., Morlet D. Predictive value of sensory and cognitive evoked potentials for awakening from coma. Neurology 2004, 63(4):669-673.
17. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Science 2005, 360(1456):815-836.
18. Garrido M.I., Kilner J.M., Stephan K.E., Friston K.J. The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120(3):453-463.
19. Giard M.H., Perrin F., Pernier J., Bouchet P. Brain generators implicated in the processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 1990, 27(6):627-640.
20. Halgren E., Marinkovic K., Chauvel P. Generators of the late cognitive potentials in auditory and visual oddball tasks. Electroencephalogram Clinical Neurophysiology 1998, 106(2):156-164.
21. Holeckova I., Fischer C., Giard M.H., Delpuech C., Morlet D. Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research 2006, 1082(1):142-152.
22. Ji J., Porjesz B., Begleiter H., Chorlian D. P300: The similarities and differences in the scalp distribution of visual and auditory modality. Brain Topography 1999, 11(4):315-327.
23. Kane N.M., Curry S.H., Butler S.R., Cummins B.H. Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma. Lancet 1993, 341(8846):688.
24. Kekoni J., Hamalainen H., Saarinen M., Grohn J., Reinikainen K., Lehtokoski A., et al. Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans. Biology and Psychology 1997, 46(2):125-142.
25. Koivisto M., Kainulainen P., Revonsuo A. The relationship between awareness and attention: Evidence from ERP responses. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(13):2891-2899.
26. Kraus N., McGee T.T.L., Nicol T., King C. Nonprimary auditory thalamic representation of acoustic change. Journal of Neurophysiology 1994, 72(3):1270-1277.
27. Laureys S., Owen A.M., Schiff N.D. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurology 2004, 3(9):537-546.
28. Levanen S., Ahonen A., Hari R., McEvoy L., Sams M. Deviant auditory stimuli activate human left and right auditory cortex differently. Cerebral Cortex 1996, 6(2):288-296.
29. Levanen S., Hari R., McEvoy L., Sams M. Responses of the human auditory cortex to changes in one versus two stimulus features. Experimental Brain Research 1993, 97(1):177-183.
30. Liebenthal E., Ellingson M.L., Spanaki M.V., Prieto T.E., Ropella K.M., Binder J.R. Simultaneous ERP and fMRI of the auditory cortex in a passive oddball paradigm. Neuroimage 2003, 19(4):1395-1404.
31. Linden D.E., Prvulovic D., Formisano E., Vollinger M., Zanella F.E., Goebel R., et al. The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: An fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cerebral Cortex 1999, 9(8):815-823.
32. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2005, MIT Press.
33. Mantini D., Corbetta M., Perrucci M.G., Romani G.L., Del Gratta C. Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection. Neuroimage 2009, 44(1):265-274.
34. Mantysalo S., Naatanen R. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biology and Psychology 1987, 24(3):183-195.
35. Molholm S., Martinez A., Ritter W., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. The neural circuitry of pre-attentive auditory change-detection: An fMRI study of pitch and duration mismatch negativity generators. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15(5):545-551.
36. Muller B.W., Achenbach C., Oades R.D., Bender S., Schall U. Modulation of mismatch negativity by stimulus deviance and modality of attention. Neuroreport 2002, 13(10):1317-1320.
37. Naatanen R., Tervaniemi M., Sussman E., Paavilainen P., Winkler L. " Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends in Neuroscience 2001, 24(5):283-288.
38. Naatanen R., Gaillard A.W., Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychology(Amsterdam) 1978, 42(4):313-329.
39. Naatanen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425.
40. Naccache L., Puybasset L., Gaillard R., Serve E., Willer J.C. Auditory mismatch negativity is a good predictor of awakening in comatose patients: A fast and reliable procedure. Clinical Neurophysiology 2005, 116(4):988-989.
41. Neuhaus A.H., Goldberg T.E., Hassoun Y., Bates J.A., Nassauer K.W., Sevy S., et al. Acute dopamine depletion with branched chain amino acids decreases auditory top-down event-related potentials in healthy subjects. Schizophrenia Research 2009, 111(1-3):167-173.
42. Opitz B., Rinne T., Mecklinger A., von Cramon D.Y., Schroger E. Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: FMRI and ERP results. Neuroimage 2002, 15(1):167-174.
43. Pazo-Alvarez P., Cadaveira F., Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: A review. Biology and Psychology 2003, 63(3):199-236.
44. Perrin F., Pernier J., Bertrand D., Echallier J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1989, 72:184-187.
45. Polich J., Eischen S.E., Collins G.E. P300 from a single auditory stimulus. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1994, 92(3):253-261.
46. Polich J., Margala C. P300 and probability: Comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology 1997, 25(2):169-176.
47. Restuccia D., Della Marca G., Marra C., Rubino M., Valeriani M. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(3):891-899.
48. Rosburg T., Trautner P., Dietl T., Korzyukov O.A., Boutros N.N., Schaller C., et al. Subdural recordings of the mismatch negativity (MMN) in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain 2005, 128(Pt 4):819-828.
49. Sergent C., Baillet S., Dehaene S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nature Neuroscience 2005, 8(10):1391-1400.
50. Shinozaki N., Yabe H., Sutoh T., Hiruma T., Kaneko S. Somatosensory automatic responses to deviant stimuli. Brain Research and Cognitive Brain Research 1998, 7(2):165-171.
51. Snyder E., Hillyard S.A. Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. Behavioural Biology 1976, 16(3):319-331.
52. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 1975, 38(4):387-401.
53. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150(700):1187-1188.
54. Tiitinen H., May P., Reinikainen K., Naatanen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 1994, 372(6501):90-92.
55. Zylberberg A., Dehaene S., Mindlin G.B., Sigman M. Neurophysiological bases of exponential sensory decay and top-down memory retrieval: A model. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 2009, 3:4.