Evaluation of codon biology in citrus and poncirus trifoliata based on genomic features and frame corrected expressed sequence tags

DNA Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 135-150

  Ahmad, Touqeer ^a   Sablok, Gaurav ^b   Tatarinova, Tatiana V ^c   Xu, Qiang ^a   Deng, Xiu Xin ^a   Guo, Wen Wu ^a  

^a HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citrus; Coevolution; Gc3 biology; Mutational bias; Poncirus trifoliata; Stress

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CITRUS; CLEMENTINE; CLONING; CODON; CODON USAGE; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA METHYLATION; EVOLUTION; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; GENE EXPRESSION; HORIZONTAL GENE TRANSFER; LIME (FRUIT); MANDARIN; MISMATCH REPAIR; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT GENOME; POSITION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN METHYLATION; SOUR ORANGE; SWEET ORANGE; TANGERINE; TOMATO; TRANSGENICS; TRIFOLIATE ORANGE;

CITRUS; CODON; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; PONCIRUS;

CERVUS AXIS; CITRUS; CITRUS CLEMENTINA; CITRUS RETICULATA; CITRUS SINENSIS; PONCIRUS TRIFOLIATA;

EID: 84879175194     PISSN: 13402838     EISSN: 17561663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dss039     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Serres-Giardi, L., Belkhir, K., David, J. and Glémin, S. 2012, Patterns and evolution of nucleotide landscapes in seed plants, Plant Cell, 24, 1379-97.
2. Hershberg, R. and Petrov, D.A. 2009, General rules for optimal codon choice, PLoS Genet., 5, e1000556.
3. Grantham, R., Gautier, C., Gouy, M., Jacobzone, M. and Mercier, R. 1981, Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity, Nucleic Acids Res., 9, 43-74.
4. Akashi, H. 2001, Gene expression and molecular evolution, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 11, 660-6.
5. Aragones, L., Guix, S., Ribes, E., Bosch, A. and Pintó, R.M. 2010, Fine-tuning translation kinetics selection as the driving force of codon usage bias in the hepatitis A virus capsid, PLoS Pathol., 6, e1000797.
6. Medigue, C., Rouxel, T., Vigier, P., Henaut, A. and Danchin, A. 1991, Evidence for horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli speciation, J. Mol. Biol., 222, 851-6.
7. Pascal, G., M'edigue, C. and Danchin, A. 2005, Universal biases in protein composition of model prokaryotes, Proteins, 60, 27-35.
8. Duret, L. 2002, Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 12, 640-9.
9. Bulmer, M. 1991, The selection-mutation drift theory of synonymous codon usage, Genetics, 129, 897-907.
10. Sharp, P.M. and Matassi, G. 1994, Codon usage and genome evolution, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 4, 851-60.
11. Akashi, H. and Eyre-Walker, A. 1998, Translational selection and molecular evolution, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 8, 688-93.
12. Gupta, S.K. and Ghosh, T.C. 2001, Gene expressivity is the main factor in dictating the codon usage variation among the genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Gene, 273, 63-70.
13. Hershberg, R. and Petrov, D.A. 2008, Selection on codon bias, Annu. Rev. Genet., 42, 287-99.
14. Harrison, R.J. and Charlesworth, B. 2011, Biased gene conversion affects patterns of codon usage and amino acid usage in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto group of yeasts, Mol. Biol. Evol., 28, 117-29.
15. Hill, W.G. and Robertson, A. 1966, The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection, Genet. Res., 8, 269-94.
16. McInerney, J.O. 1998, Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 10698-703.
17. Chen, S.L., Lee, W., Hottes, A.K., Shapiro, L. and McAdams, H.H. 2004, Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 3480-85.
18. Qin, H., Biao, W.W., Comeron, J.M., Kreitman, M. and Li, W.H. 2004, Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, Genetics, 168, 2245-60.
19. Stoletzki, N. and Eyre-Walker, A. 2007, Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: Selection for translational accuracy, Mol. Biol. Evol., 24, 374-81.
20. Lin, Y.S., Byrnes, J.K., Hwang, J.K. and Li, W.H. 2006, Codon-usage bias versus gene conversion in the evolution of yeast duplicate genes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 14412-16.
21. Zhou, T., Sun, X. and Lu, Z. 2006, Synonymous codon usage in environmental Chlamydia UWE25 reflects an evolutional divergence from pathogenic Chlamydiae, Gene, 368, 117-25.
22. Sharp, P.M., Emery, L.R. and Zeng, K. 2010, Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 365, 1203-12.
23. Wright, F. 1990, The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene, Gene, 87, 23-29.
24. Wan, X.F., Xu, D., Kleinhofs, A. and Zhou, J. 2004, Quantitative relationship between synonymous bias and GC composition across unicellular genomes, BMC Evol. Biol., 4, 19.
25. Xu, Q., Chen, L.L., Ruan, X., et al. 2012, The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), Nat. Genet., doi:10.1038/ng.2472.
26. Huang, X. and Madan, A. 1999, CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program, Genome Res., 9, 868-77.
27. Gouzy, J., Carrere, S. and Schiex, T. 2009, FrameDP: Sensitive peptide detection on noisy matured sequences, Bioinformatics, 25, 670-71.
28. Schiex, T., Gouzy, J., Moisan, A. and de Oliveira, Y. 2003, FrameD: A flexible program for quality check and gene prediction in prokaryotic genomes and noisy matured eukaryotic sequences, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 373-81.
29. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schaffer, A.A., et al. 1997, Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-402.
30. Greenacre, M.J. 1984, Theory and Application of Correspondence Analysis. Academic Press: London, 223 pp.
31. Sharp, P.M. and Li, W.H. 1986, An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms, J. Mol. Biol., 24, 28-38.
32. Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R. 1982, A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein, J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105-32.
33. Ikemura, T. 1985, Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2, 13-34.
34. Sablok, G., Nayak, K., Vazquez, F. and Tatarinova, T.V. 2011, Synonymous codon usage, GC3 and evolutionary patterns across plastomes of three pooid model species-emerging grass genome models for monocots, Mol. Biotechnol., 49, 116-28.
35. Lechner, M., Findeiss, S., Steiner, L., Marz, M., Stadler, P.F. and Prohaska, S.J. 2011, Proteinortho: Detection of (co-) orthologs in large-scale analysis, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 124.
36. Foster, P.G., Jermiin, L.S. and Hickey, D.A. 1997, Nucleotide composition bias affects amino acid content in proteins coded by animal mitochondria, J. Mol. Evol., 44, 282-88.
37. Singer, G.A.C. and Hickey, D.A. 2000, Nucleotide bias causes a genomewide bias in the amino acid composition of proteins, Mol. Biol. Evol., 17, 1581-88.
38. Hu, G.B., Zhang, S.L., Xu, C.J. and Lin, S.Q. 2006, Analysis of codon usage in Citrus, J. Fruit Sci., 23, 479-85.
39. Sueoka, N. 1964, On the evolution of informational macromolecules. In: Bryson, V. and Vogel, H.J. (eds.), Evolving Genes and Proteins. Academic Press: New York, pp. 479-96.
40. Sueoka, N. and Kawanishi, Y. 2000, DNA G C content of the third codon position and codon usage biases of human genes, Gene, 261, 53-62.
41. Sueoka, N. 1988, Directional mutation pressure and neutral molecular evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 2653-57.
42. Wang, H.C. and Hickey, D.A. 2007, Rapid divergence of codon usage patterns within the rice genome, BMC Evol. Biol., 7, Suppl. 1, S6.
43. Gupta, S.K., Bhattacharyya, T.K. and Ghosh, T.C. 2004, Synonymous codon usage in Lactococcus lactis: Mutational bias versus translational selection, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 21, 527-36.
44. Wright, F. and Bibb, M.J. 1992, Codon usage in the GC-rich Streptomyces genome, Gene, 113, 55-65.
45. Tatarinova, T., Alexandrov, N., Bouck, J. and Feldmann, K. 2010, GC3 biology in corn, rice, sorghum and other grasses, BMC Genomics, 11, 308.
46. Sharp, P.M., Cowe, E., Higgins, D.G., Shields, D.C., Wolfe, K.H. and Wright, F. 1988, Codon usage in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens; a review of the considerable within-species diversity, Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 8207-11.
47. Andersson, S.G.E. and Kurland, C.G. 1990, Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms, Microbiol. Rev., 54, 198-210.
48. Qian, W., Yang, J-R., Pearson, N.M., Maclean, C. and Zhang, J. 2012, Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency, PLoS Genet., 8, e1002603.
49. Sørensen, M.A. and Pedersen, S. 1991, Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli: The two glutamic acid codons GAA and GAG are translated with a threefold difference in rate, J. Mol. Biol., 222, 265-80.
50. Kudla, G., Murray, A.W., Tollervey, D. and Plotkin, J.B. 2009, Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli, Science, 324, 255-58.
51. Audic, S. and Claverie, J.M. 1997, The significance of digital gene expression profiles, Genome Res., 7, 986-95.
52. Munoz, E.T., Bogarad, L.D. and Deem, M.W. 2004, Microarray and EST database estimates of mRNA expression levels differ: The protein length versus expression curve for C. elegans, BMC Genomics, 5, 30.
53. Cutter, A.D., Wasmuth, J.D. and Washington, N.L. 2008, Patterns of molecular evolution in Caenorhabditis preclude ancient origins of selfing, Genetics, 178, 2093-104.
54. Ingvarsson, P.D. 2008, Molecular evolution of synonymous codon usage in Populus, BMC Evol. Biol., 8, 307.
55. Whittle, C.A., Sun, Y. and Johannesson, H. 2011, Evolution of synonymous codon usage in Neurospora tetrasperma and Neurospora discrete, Genome Biol. Evol., 3, 332-43.
56. Knight, R.D., Freeland, S.J. and Landweber, L.F. 2001, A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and amino acid usage and GC composition within and across genomes, Genome Biol., 2, research0010.
57. Mitreva, M., Wendl, M.C., Martin, J., et al. 2006, Codon usage patterns in Nematoda: Analysis based on over 25 million codons in thirty-two species, Genome Biol., 7, R75.
58. Palidwor, G.A., Perkins, T.J. and Xia, X. 2010, A general model of codon bias due to GC mutational bias, PLoS ONE, 5, e13431.
59. Hiwasa-Tanase, K., Nyarubona, M., Hirai, T., Kato, K., Ichikawa, T. and Ezura, H. 2011, High-level accumulation of recombinant miraculin protein in transgenic tomatoes expressing a synthetic miraculin gene with optimized codon usage terminated by the native miraculin terminator, Plant Cell Rep., 30, 113-24.
60. Mendez, R., Fritsche, M., Porto, M. and Bastolla, U. 2010, Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations, PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000767.
61. Jiang, N., Fergusona, A.A., Slotkinb, R.K. and Lischc, D. 2011, Pack-mutator-like transposable elements (Pack-MULEs) induce directional modification of genes through biased insertion and DNA acquisition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 1537-42.
62. Stayssman, R., Nejman, D., Roberts, D., et al. 2009, Developmental programming of CpG island methylation profiles in the human genome, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 16, 564-71.
63. Gupta, A.B. and Sankararamakrishnan, R. 2009, Genome-wide analysis of major intrinsic proteins in the tree plant Populus trichocarpa: Characterization of XIP subfamily of aquaporins from evolutionary perspective, BMC Plant Biol., 9, 134.