Diagnostic performance of 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography in women

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1154-1161

  Jug, Borut ^a,b   Gupta, Mohit ^a   Papazian, Jenny ^a   Li, Dong ^a   Tsang, Janet ^a   Bhatia, Harpreet ^c   Karlsberg, Ronald ^c,d   Budoff, Matthew ^a,d  

^a UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^c Cardiovascular Medical Group of Southern California   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

computed tomography; coronary angiography; females; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX PAIN; AGED; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

AGED; CHEST PAIN; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOS ANGELES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84879174774     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: 15326551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9630-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kung H, Hoyert D, Xu J, Murphy S. Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2008;56:1-120.
2. Stramba-Badiale M, Fox K, Priori S, Collins P, Daly C, Graham I, et al. Cardio-vascular diseases in women: a statement from the policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:994-1005.
3. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Committee ftAHAS, Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009;119:e21-181.
4. Mosca L, Ferris A, Fabunmi R, Robertson RM. Tracking women's awareness of heart disease: An American Heart Association National Study. Circulation 2004;109:573-9.
5. Patel H, Rosengren A, Ekman I. Symptoms in acute coronary syndromes: Does sex make a difference? Am Heart J 2004;148:27-33.
6. Shaw L, Bairey Merz C, Pepine C, Reis S, Bittner V, Kelsey S, et al. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:S4-20.
7. Stangl V, Witzel V, Baumann G, Stangl K. Current diagnostic concepts to detect coronary artery disease in women. Eur Heart J 2008;29:707-17.
8. Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CNB, Brindis RG, Klein LW, Nallamothu B, et al. Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 2008;117:1787-801.
9. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: Results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-32.
10. Bashore T, Bates E, Kern M, Berger P, Laskey W, Clark D, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and interventions clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: Summary of a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2170-214.
11. Austen W, Edwards J, Frye R, Gensini G, Gott V, Griffith L, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
12. Mark D, Nelson C, Califf R, Harrell F Jr, Lee K, Jones R, et al. Continuing evolution of therapy for coronary artery disease. Initial results from the era of coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1994;89:2015-25.
13. Nasir K, Redberg RF, Budoff MJ, Hui E, Post WS, Blumenthal RS. Utility of stress testing and coronary calcification measurement for detection of coronary artery disease in women. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1610-20.
14. Kwok Y, Kim C, Grady D, Segal M, Redberg R. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:660-6.
15. Travin M, Katz M, Moulton A, Miele N, Sharaf B, Johnson L. Accuracy of dipyridamole SPECT imaging in identifying individual coronary stenosis and mutlivessel disease in women versus men. J Nucl Cardiol 2000;7:213-20.
16. Pundziute G, Schuijf J, Jukema J, van Werkhoven J, Boersma E, de Roos A, et al. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart 2008;94:48-52.
17. Meijboom WB, Annick CW, Francesca P, Carlos AGvM, Nico RM, van Niels P. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:1532-7.
18. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317-23.
19. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GGL, Malagutti P, Agostoni P, Morello R, Valgimigli M, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1896-910.
20. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: A science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65.
21. ICRP. Task Group of Committees 2 and 3 of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiation Dose to Patients from Radiopharmaceuticals - ICRP publication 106 (Addendum 3 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP 2008;38:1-197.
22. Betsou S, Efstathopoulos E, Katritsis D, Faulkner K, Panayiotakis G. Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998;71:634-9.
23. Tsang JC, Min JK, Lin FY, Shaw LJ, Budoff MJ. Sex comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: Results from the multicenter ACCURACY trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:246-51.
24. White CW, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med 1984;310:819-24.