Sex comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography: Results from the multicenter ACCURACY trial

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 246-251

  Tsang, Janet C ^a   Min, James K ^b   Lin, Fay Y ^b   Shaw, Leslee J ^c   Budoff, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE;

AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862750885     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: 1876861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Mieres J.H., Shaw L.J., Arai A., Budoff M.J., Flamm S.D., Hundley W.G., Marwick H.T., Mosca L., Patel A.R., Quinones M.A., Redberg R.F., Taubert K.A., Taylor A.J., Thomas G.S., Wenger N.K. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected coronary artery disease: consensus statement from the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association. Circulation 2005, 111:682-696.
2. Makaryus A.N., Shaw L.J., Mieres J.H. Diagnostic strategies for heart disease in women. Cardiol Rev 2007, 15:279-287.
3. San Roman J.A., Vilacosta I., Castillo J.A., Rollan M.J., Hernandez M., Peral V., Garcimartin I., del Mar de la Torre M., Fernandez-Aviles F. Selection of the optimum stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart 1998, 80:370-376.
4. Shaw L.J., Bairey Merz C.N., Pepine C.J., Reis S.E., Bittner V., Kelsey S.F., Olson M., Johnson D., Mankad S., Sharaf B.L., Rogers W.J., Wessel T.R., Arant C.B., Pohost G.M., Lerman A., Quyyumi A.A., Sopko G. Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:4S-20S.
5. Kwok Y., Kim C., Grady D., Segal M., Redberg R. Meta-analysis of exercise testing to detect coronary artery disease in women. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83:660-666.
6. Kim C., Kwok Y.S., Heagerty P., Redberg R. Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2001, 142:934-944.
7. Nasir K., Redberg R.F., Budoff M.J., Hui E., Post W.S., Blumenthal R.S. Utility of stress testing and coronary calcification measurement for detection of coronary artery disease in women. Arch Intern Med 2004, 164:1610-1620.
8. Shaw L.J., Hachamovitch R., Redberg R.F. Current evidence on diagnostic testing in women with suspected coronary artery disease. Cardiol Rev 2000, 8:65-74.
9. Budoff M.J., Achenbach S., Blumenthal R.S., Carr J.J., Goldin J.G., Greenland P., Guerci A.D., Lima J.A., Rader D.J., Rubin G.D., Shaw L.J., Wieger S.E. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography, a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006, 114:1761-1791.
10. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., Gitter M., Sutherland J., Halamert E., Scherer M., Bellinger R., Martin A., Benton R., Delago A., Min J.K. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1724-1732.
11. Weigold W.G., Abbara S., Achenbach S., Arbab-Zadeh A., Berman D., Carr J.J., Cury R.C., Halliburton S.S., McCollough C.H., Taylor A.J. Standardized medical terminology for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011, 5:136-144.
12. Halliburton S.S., Abbara S., Chen M.Y., Gentry R., Mahesh M., Raff G.L., Shaw L.J., Hausleiter J. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011, 5:198-224. Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography.
13. Abbara S., Arbab-Zadeh A., Callister T.Q., Desai M.Y., Mamuya W., Thomson L., Weigold W.G. SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:190-204.
14. Meijboom W.B., Weustink A.C., Pugliese F., van Mieghem C.A.G., Mollet N.R., van Pelt N., Cademartiri F., Nieman K., Vourvouri E., Regar E., Krestin G.P., de Feyter P.J. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 2007, 100:1532-1537.
15. Pundzuite G., Schuijf J.D., Jukema J.W., van Werkhoven J.M., Boersma E., de Roos A., van der Wall E.E., Bax J.J. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Heart 2008, 9:48-52.
16. Dewey M., Rutsch W., Hamm B. Is there a gender difference in noninvasive coronary imaging? Multislice computed tomography for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2008, 8:2.
17. Patel M.R., Peterson E.D., Dai D., Brennan J.M., Redberg R.F., Anderson H.V., Brindis R.G., Douglas P.S. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:886-895.
18. Gopal A., Mao S.S., Karlsberg D., Young E., Waggoner J., Ahmadi N., Pal R.S., Leal J., Karlsberg R.P., Budoff M.J. Radiation reduction with prospective ECG-triggering acquisition using 64-multidetector computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 25:405-416.
19. Budoff M.J. Maximizing dose reductions with cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 25:279-287.
20. Gerber T.C., Carr J.J., Arai A.E., Dixon R.L., Ferrari V.A., Gomes A.S., Heller G.V., McCollough C.H., McNitt-Gray M.F., Mettler F.A., Mieres J.H., Morin R.L., Yester M.V. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009, 119:1056-1065.
21. Hamirani Y.S., Isma'eel H., Larijani V., Drury P., Lim W., Bevinal M., Saeed A., Ahmadi N., Karlsberg R.P., Budoff M.J. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-detector cardiac computed tomography compared with stress nuclear imaging in patients undergoing invasive cardiac catheterization. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010, 34:645-651.
22. Hacioglu Y., Gupta M., Budoff M.J. Noninvasive anatomical coronary artery imaging versus myocardial perfusion imaging: which confers superior diagnostic and prognostic information?. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010, 34:637-644.