Cross-efficiency evaluation under the principle of rank priority of DMUs

World Applied Sciences Journal

Volumn 21, Issue SPECIAL ISSUE3, 2013, Pages 46-49

  Zohrehbandian, M ^a   Sadeghi Gavgani, S ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cross efficiency; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Ranking; Secondary goal

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879172222     PISSN: 18184952     EISSN: 19916426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.am.815     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, T.R., K.B. Hollingsworth and L.B. Inman, 2002. The fixed weighting nature of a cross-evaluation model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18: 249-255.
2. Bao, C.P., T.H. Chen and S.Y. Chang, 2007. Slack based ranking method: An interpretation to the cross efficiency method in DEA. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59: 860-862.
3. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-444.
4. Chen, T.Y., 2002. An assessment of technical efficiency and cross efficiency in Taiwan's electricity distribution sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 137: 421-433.
5. Doyle, J.R. and R. Green, 1994. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in data envelopment analysis: Derivatives meaning and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45 (5): 567-578.
6. Doyle, J.R. and R. Green, 1995. Cross evaluation in DEA: Improving discrimination among DMUs. INFOR, 33: 205-222.
7. Farzipour Saeen, R., 2009. The use of artificial natural networks for technology selection in presence of both continues and categorical data. World Applied Science Journal, 6 (9): 1177-1189.
8. Garkaz, M. and F. Pesarakloo, 2011. Determination of portfolio through fuzzy data envelopment analysis in companies accepted in Tehran securities exchange. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 8 (5): 942-946.
9. Green, R.H., J.R. Doyle and W.D. Cook, 1996. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 90: 461-472.
10. Liang L., J. Wu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, 2008a. Alternative secondary goal in DEA cross efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 113: 1025-1030.
11. Liang, L., J. Wu, W.D. Cook and J. Zhu, 2008b. The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56: 1278-1288.
12. Mohamad, N.H. and F. Said, 2012. Using super efficient DEA model evaluate the business performance in Malaysia. World Applied Science Journal, 17 (9): 1167-1177.
13. Oral, M., O. Kattani and P. Lang, 1991. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R &D projects. Management Science, 37: 871-885.
14. Sexton, T.R., 1986. The methodology of data envelopment analysis. In Silkman, R.H. (Ed.) Measuring efficiency: An assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp: 7-29.
15. Shahverdi, R., M. Adabi Tabar Firuzja, A. Ebrahimnejad and S. Torshiz, 2011. Ranking DMUs by use of a neutral DEA model in the present of absolute weight bounds. World Applied Science Journal, 14 (11): 1655-1660.
16. Shang, J. and T. Sueyoshi, 1995. A unified framework for the selection of flexible manufacturing system. European Journal of Operational Research, 85: 297-315.
17. Sun, S. and W.M. Lu, 2005. A cross-efficiency profiling for increasing discrimination in Data Envelopment Analysis. INFOR, 43: 51-60.
18. Wu, J., L. Liang and Y. Chen, 2009a. DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings. Omega, 37: 909-918.
19. Wu, J., L. Liang and F. Yang, 2009b. Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross-efficiency evaluation method. European Journal of Operational Research, 197: 722-730.
20. Wu, J., L. Liang and F. Yang, 2009c. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using shapely value in cooperative game. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 872-876.
21. Wu, J., L. Liang, Y. Zha and F. Yang, 2009d. Determination of cross efficiency under the principle of rank priority in cross evaluation. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 4826-4829.
22. Zerafat Angiz, M. and A. Sajedi, 2012. Improving cross efficiency evaluation using fuzzy concepts. World Applied Science Journal, 16 (10): 1352-1359.