Ranking DMUs by use of a neutral DEA model in the present of absolute weight bounds

World Applied Sciences Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1655-1660

  Shahverdi, R ^a   Adabi Tabar Firuzja, M ^a   Ebrahimnejad, A ^a   Torshizi, S ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Absolute weight bounds; Cross efficiency evaluation; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Ranking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864936188     PISSN: 18184952     EISSN: 19916426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European J. Operational Res., 2: 429-444.
2. Wang, Y.M. and K.S. Chin, 2010. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Systems with Applications, 37: 3666-3675.
3. Jahanshahloo, G.R., A. Memariani, F. Hossienzadeh and N. Shoja, 2005. A feasible interval for weights in DEA. Applied Mathemathics and Computation, 160(1): 155-168.
4. Podinovski, V.V. and A. Athanassopoulos, 1998. Assessing relative efficiency of decision making units DEA model with weight restriction. J. The Operational Research Society, 49: 500-508.
5. Podinovski, V.V., 1999. Side effects of absolute weight bounds in DEA models. European J. Operational Res., 115: 583-595.
6. Podinovski, V.V., 2004. Suitability and Redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA. European J. Operational Res., 154(2): 380-395.
7. Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, 1962. Programming with linear fractional functional. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9: 181-185.
8. Doyle, J. and R. Green, 1994. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. J. The Operations Research Society, 45: 567-578.
9. Wong, Y.H.B. and J.E. Beasley, 1990. Restricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J. The Operational Research Society, 41: 829-835.