A unified mathematical framework and an adaptive numerical method for fluid-structure interaction with rigid, deforming, and elastic bodies

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 250, Issue , 2013, Pages 446-476

  Bhalla, Amneet Pal Singh ^a   Bale, Rahul ^a   Griffith, Boyce E ^b   Patankar, Neelesh A ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive mesh refinement; Distributed Lagrange multipliers; Fluid structure interaction; Free swimming; Immersed boundary method; Incompressible Navier Stokes equations

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYERS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; MESH GENERATION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL METHODS; RIGID STRUCTURES; TURBULENT FLOW;

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; ADAPTIVE NUMERICAL METHODS; CARTESIAN GRID; DISTRIBUTED LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER; FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; FREE SWIMMING; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS; INCOMPRESSIBLE (NAVIER )STOKES EQUATION; INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 84879161700     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.033     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Hu H.H., Patankar N.A., Zhu M.Y. Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian technique. J. Comput. Phys. 2001, 169:427-462.
2. Kern S., Koumoutsakos P. Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming. J. Expt. Biol. 2006, 209:4841-4857.
3. Peskin C.S. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer. 2002, 11:479-517.
4. Lai M.-C., Li Z.-L. A remark on jump conditions for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations involving an immersed moving membrane. Appl. Math. Lett. 2001, 14(2):149-154.
5. Xu S., Wang Z.J. Systematic derivation of jump conditions for the immersed interface method in three-dimensional flow simulation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2006, 27(6):1948-1980.
6. Roma A.M., Peskin C.S., Berger M.J. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 153(2):509-534.
7. Griffith B.E., Hornung R.D., McQueen D.M., Peskin C.S. An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 223(1):10-49.
8. Griffith B.E., Hornung R.D., McQueen D.M., Peskin C.S. Parallel and adaptive simulation of cardiac fluid dynamics. Advanced Computational Infrastructures for Parallel and Distributed Adaptive Applications 2009, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA. M. Parashar, X. Li (Eds.).
9. Griffith B.E. Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 28(3):317-345.
10. Glowinski R., Pan T.-W., Hesla T.I., Joseph D.D. A distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1999, 25:755-794.
11. Patankar N.A., Singh P., Joseph D.D., Glowinski R., Pan T. A new formulation of the distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2000, 26:1509-1524.
12. N.A. Patankar, A formulation for fast computations of rigid particulate flows, Tech. rep., Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs, (2001). http://ctr.stanford.edu.
13. Patankar N.A. Physical interpretation and mathematical properties of the stress-DLM formulation for rigid particulate flows. Int. J. Comput. Method Eng. Sci. Mech. 2005, 6:137-143.
14. Shirgaonkar A.A., MacIver M.A., Patankar N.A. A new mathematical formulational and fast algorithm for fully resolved simulation of self-propulsion. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:2366-2390.
15. Chorin A.J. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput. 1968, 22(104):745-762.
16. Berger M.J., Oliger J. Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial-differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 1984, 53(3):484-512.
17. Berger M.J., Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 82(1):64-84.
18. Fauci L.J., Peskin C.S. A computational model of aquatic animal locomotion. J. Comput. Phys. 1988, 77:85-108.
19. Tytell E.D., Hsu C.-Y., Williams T.L., Cohen A.H., Fauci L.J. Interactions between internal forces, body stiffness, and fluid environment in a neuromechanical model of lamprey swimming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:19832-19837.
20. Zhao H., Freund J.B., Moser R.D. A fixed-mesh method for incompressible flow-structure systems with finite solid deformations. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:3114-3140.
21. Herschlag G., Miller L. Reynolds number limits for jet propulsion: A numerical study of simplified jellyfish. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 285:84-95.
22. Mittal R. Computational modeling in bio-hydrodynamics: trends, challenges and recent advances. IEEE J. Ocean Eng. 2004, 29:595-604.
23. Mittal R., Dong H., Lauder G.V. Locomotion with flexible propulsors. II: Computational modeling of pectoral fin swimming in sunfish. Bioinsp. Biomim. 2006, 1:S35-S41.
24. Borazjani I., Sotiropoulos F. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of crangiform swimming in the translational and inertial flow regimes. J. Expt. Biol. 2008, 211:1541-1558.
25. Shirgaonkar A.A., Curet O.M., Patankar N.A., MacIver M.A. The hydrodynamics of ribbon-fin propulsion during impulsive motion. J. Expt. Biol. 2008, 211:3490-3503.
26. Curet O.M., AlAli I.K., MacIver M.A., Patankar N.A. A versatile implicit iterative approach for fully resolved simulations of self-propulsion. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2010, 199:2336-2390.
27. Bergmann M., Iollo A. Modeling and simulation of fish-like swimming. J. Comput. Phys. 2011, 230:329-348.
28. Lauder G.V. Function of the caudal fin during locomotion in fishes: kinematics, flow visualization, and evolutionary patterns. Am. Zool. 2000, 40:101-122.
29. Lauder G.V., Nauen J.C., Drucker E.G. Experimental hydrodynamics and evolution: function of median fins in ray-finned fishes. Integr. Comput. Biol. 2002, 42:1009-1017.
30. Dabiri J.O., Gharib M. Sensitivity analysis of kinematic approximations in dynamic medusan swimming models. J. Expt. Biol. 2003, 206:3675-3680.
31. Tytell E.D., Lauder G.V. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming. I: Wake structure. J. Expt. Biol. 2004, 207:1825-1841.
32. Curet O.M., Patankar N.A., Lauder G.V., MacIver M.A. Aquatic manoeuvering with counter-propagating waves: a novel locomotive strategy. J. R. Soc. Interface 2011, 8:1041-1050.
33. Curet O.M., Patankar N.A., Lauder G.V., MacIver M.A. Mechanical properties of a bio-inspired robotic knifefish with an undulatory propulsor. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2011, 6:026004.
34. Ruiz-Torres R., Curet O.M., Lauder G.V., MacIver M.A. Kinematics of the ribbon fin in hovering and swimming of the electric ghost knifefish. J. Expt. Biol. 2013, 216:823-834.
35. Apte S.V., Martin M., Patankar N.A. A numerical method for fully resolved simulation (FRS) of rigid particle-flow interactions in complex flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:2712-2738.
36. Apte S., Finn J. A variable-density fictitious domain method for particulate flows with broad range of particle-fluid density ratios. J. Comput. Phys. 2013, 243:109-129.
37. T.G. Fai, B.E. Griffith, Y. Mori, C.S. Peskin, Immersed boundary method for variable viscosity and variable density problems using fast linear solvers. I: Numerical method and results, manuscript submitted for publication.
38. T.G. Fai, B.E. Griffith, Y. Mori, C.S. Peskin, Immersed boundary method for variable viscosity and variable density problems using fast linear solvers. II: Theory, manuscript submitted for publication.
39. Griffith B.E., Luo X., McQueen D.M., Peskin C.S. Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 2009, 1(1):137-177.
40. Zhang L., Gerstenberger A., Wang X., Liu W.K. Immersed finite element method. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2004, 193(21-22):2051-2067.
41. Liu W.K., Liu Y., Farrell D., Zhang L., Wang X.S., Fukui Y., Patankar N., Zhang Y., Bajaj C., Lee J., Hong J., Chen X., Hsu H. Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2006, 195(13-16):1722-1749.
42. Boffi D., Gastaldi L., Heltai L., Peskin C.S. On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 2008, 197(25-28):2210-2231.
43. Devendran D., Peksin C.S. An energy-based immersed boundary method for incompressible viscoelasticity. J. Comput. Phys. 2012, 231(14):4613-4642.
44. B.E. Griffith, X. Luo, Hybrid finite difference/finite element version of the immersed boundary method, manuscript submitted for publications.
45. Griffith B.E., Peskin C.S. On the order of accuracy of the immersed boundary method: Higher order convergence rates for sufficiently smooth problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 208(1):75-105.
46. Rider W.J., Greenough J.A., Kamm J.R. Accurate monotonicity- and extrema-preserving methods through adaptive nonlinear hybridizations. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 225(2):1827-1848.
47. Colella P., Woodward P.R. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 1984, 54(1):174-201.
48. Saad Y. A flexible inner-outer preconditioned GMRES algorithm. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1993, 14(2):461-469.
49. Griffith B.E. An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228(20):7565-7595.
50. Berger M.J., Rigoutsos I. An algorithm for point clustering and grid generation. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern. 1991, 21(5):1278-1286.
51. Tóth G., Roe P.L. Divergence- and curl-preserving prolongation and restriction formulas. J. Comput. Phys. 2002, 180(2):736-750.
52. IBAMR: An adaptive and distributed-memory parallel implementation of the immersed boundary method, http://ibamr.googlecode.com.
53. SAMRAI: Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Application Infrastructure, http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/SAMRAI.
54. Hornung R.D., Kohn S.R. Managing application complexity in the SAMRAI object-oriented framework. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Ex. 2002, 14(5):347-368.
55. Hornung R.D., Wissink A.M., Kohn S.R. Managing complex data and geometry in parallel structured AMR applications. Eng. Comput. 2006, 22(3-4):181-195.
56. S. Balay, K. Buschelman, W.D. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M.G. Knepley, L.C. McInnes, B.F. Smith, H. Zhang, PETSc Web page, (2009). http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc.
57. S. Balay, K. Buschelman, V. Eijkhout, W.D. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M.G. Knepley, L.C. McInnes, B.F. Smith, H. Zhang, PETSc users manual, Tech. Rep. ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.0.0, Argonne National Laboratory (2008).
58. S. Balay, V. Eijkhout, W.D. Gropp, L.C. McInnes, B.F. Smith, Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries, in: E. Arge, A.M. Bruaset, H.P. Langtangen (Eds.), Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, Birkhäuser Press, 1997, pp. 163-202.
59. hypre: High performance preconditioners, http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/hypre.
60. R.D. Falgout, U.M. Yang, hypre: a library of high performance preconditioners, in: P.M.A. Sloot, C.J.K. Tan, J.J. Dongarra, A.G. Hoekstra (Eds.), Computational Science - ICCS 2002 Part III, Vol. 2331 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 632-641. Also available as LLNL Technical, Report UCRL-JC-146175.
61. libMesh: C++ Finite Element Library, http://libmesh.sourceforge.net.
62. Kirk B., Peterson J.W., Stogner R.H., Carey G.F. libMesh: A C++ library for parallel adaptive mesh refinement/coarsening simulations. Eng. Comput. 2006, 22(3-4):237-254.
63. Taira K., Colonius T. The immersed boundary method: a projection approach. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 225:2118-2137.
64. Dennis S.C.R., Quang W., Coutanceau M., Launay J.-L. Viscous flow normal to a flat plate at moderate Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid. Mech. 1993, 248:605-635.
65. Uhlmann M. First experiments with simulation of particulate flows, Technical reports 1020, issn: 1135-9420 2003, Tech. rep., CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain.
66. Braza M., Chassaing P., Minh H.H. Numerical study and physical analysis of the pressure and velocity fields in the near wake of a circular cylinder. J. Fluid. Mech. 1986, 165:79-130.
67. Henderson R. Nonlinear dynamics and pattern formation in turbulent wake transition. J. Fluid. Mech. 1997, 352:65-112.
68. He J.-W., Glowinski R., Metcalfe R., Nordlander A., Périaux J. Active control and drag optimization for flow past a circular cylinder. Part 1. Oscillatory cylinder rotation. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 163:83-117.
69. Shen L., Chan E.-S., Lin P. Calculation of hydrodynamic forces acting on submerged moving object using immersed boundary method. Comput. Fluid 2009, 38:691-702.
70. Dutsch H., Durst F., Becker S., Lienhart H. Low-Reynolds-number flow around an oscillating circular cylinder at low Keulegan-Carpenter numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 360:249-271.
71. Mordant N., Pinton J.F. Velocity measurement of a settling sphere. Eur. Phys. J. B 2000, 18:343-352.
72. Sharma N., Patankar N.A. A fast computational technique for the direct numerical simulation of rigid particulate flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2005, 205:439-457.
73. Yeo K.S., Ang S.J., Shu C. Simulation of fish swimming and manoeuvring by an SVD- GFD method on a hybrid meshfree-Cartesian grid. Comput. Fluid 2010, 39:403-430.
74. Poe G.G., Acrivos A. Closed-streamline flows past rotating single cylinders and spheres: inertia effects. J. Fluid Mech. 1975, 72:605-623.
75. Nirschl H., Dwyer H.A., Denk V. Three-dimensional calculations of the simple shear flow around a single particle between two moving walls. J. Fluid Mech. 1995, 283:273-285.
76. Patankar N.A., Hu H.H. Finite Reynolds number effect on the rheology of a dilute suspension of neutrally buoyant circular particles in a Newtonian fluid. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 2002, 28:409-425.
77. Mikulencak D.R., Morris J.F. Stationary shear flow around fixed and free bodies at finite Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 2004, 520:215-242.
78. Yu P., Yeo K.S., Sundar D.S., Ang S.J. A three-dimensional hybrid meshfree-Cartesian scheme for fluid-body interaction. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 2011, 88:385-408.
79. Triantafyllou G.S., Triantafyllou M.S., Grosenbaugh M.A. Optimal thrust development in oscillating foils with application to fish propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 1993, 7:205-224.
80. Tytell E.D. The hydrodynamics of eel swimming II. Effect of swimming speed. J. Expt. Biol. 2004, 207:3265-3279.
81. MacIver M.A., Nelson M.E. Body modeling and model-based tracking for neuroethology. J. Neurosci. Method 2000, 95:133-143.
82. McMillen T., Holmes P. An elastic rod model for anguilliform swimming. J. Math. Biol. 2006, 53:843-886.
83. Li Z.-L., Lai M.-C. The immersed interface method for the Navier-Stokes equations with singular forces. J. Comput. Phys. 2001, 171(2):822-842.
84. Lee L., LeVeque R.J. An immersed interface method for incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2003, 25(3):832-856.
85. Brown D.L., Cortez R., Minion M.L. Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2001, 168(2):464-499.
86. Y. Kim, C.S. Peskin, Penalty immersed boundary method for an elastic boundary with mass, Phys. Fluid 19 (2007) 053103 (18 pages).