Erratum: Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions [International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering 28,3 (2012) 317-345] DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1445;Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 317-345

  Griffith, Boyce E ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR); Cardiac fluid dynamics; Fluid structure interaction; Immersed boundary method

Indexed keywords

BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VESSELS; DELTA FUNCTIONS; DIGITAL STORAGE; ELASTICITY; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; HEART; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; TURBULENT FLOW;

ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT; CARDIAC FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID-STRUCTURE SYSTEMS; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS; PERIODIC STEADY STATE; THREE DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS; UNIFIED FORMULATIONS; VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS;

RIGID STRUCTURES;

AORTA VALVE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HEART VENTRICLE; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRESSURE;

EID: 84858400633     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2543     Document Type: Erratum

References (74)

1. Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a digital computer method for solving the equations of motion. Ph.D. Thesis, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1972.
2. Peskin CS. Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. Journal of Computational Physics 1977; 25(3):220-252.
3. Peskin CS. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica 2002; 11:479-517.
4. Iaccarino G, Verzicco R. Immersed boundary technique for turbulent flow simulations. Applied Mechanics Reviews 2003; 56(3):331-347.
5. Mittal R, Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2005; 37:239-261.
6. Yoganathan AP, He ZM, Jones SC. Fluid mechanics of heart valves. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2004; 6:331-362.
7. Carr JA, Savage EB. Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2005; 25(1):6-15.
8. Freeman RV, Otto CM. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: Pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation 2005; 111(24):3316-3326.
9. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 2006; 114(5):E84-E231.
10. Singh IM, Shishehbor MH, Christofferson RD, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Percutaneous treatment of aortic valve stenosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2008; 75(11):805-812.
11. Griffith BE, Luo X, McQueen DM, Peskin CS. Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method. International Journal of Applied Mechanics 2009; 1(1):137-177.
12. Peskin CS, McQueen DM. Mechanical equilibrium determines the fractal fiber architecture of aortic heart valve leaflets. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 1994; 266(1):H319-H328.
13. Reul H, Vahlbruch A, Giersiepen M, Schmitz-Rode T, Hirtz V, Effert S. The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. Journal of Biomechanics 1990; 23:181-191.
14. Swanson M, Clark RE. Dimensions and geometric relationships of the human aortic valve as a function of pressure. Circulation Research 1974; 35(6):871-882.
15. Stergiopulos N, Westerhof BE, Westerhof N. Total arterial inertance as the fourth element of the windkessel model. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology 1999; 276(1):H81-H88.
16. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980; 62(1):105-116.
17. Griffith BE, Hornung RD, McQueen DM, Peskin CS. An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 223(1):10-49.
18. Griffith BE. On the volume conservation of the immersed boundary method. Submitted, preprint available from .
19. Roma AM, Peskin CS, Berger MJ. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 153(2):509-534.
20. Harlow FH, Welch JE. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompresible flow of fluid with free surface. Physics of Fluids 1965; 8(12):2182-2189.
21. Lai MC, Peskin CS. An immersed boundary method with formal second-order accuracy and reduced numerical viscosity. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 160(2):705-719.
22. Griffith BE, Peskin CS. On the order of accuracy of the immersed boundary method: higher order convergence rates for sufficiently smooth problems. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 208(1):75-105.
23. Griffith BE. An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner. Journal of Computational Physics 2009; 228(20):7565-7595.
24. Rider WJ, Greenough JA, Kamm JR. Accurate monotonicity- and extrema-preserving methods through adaptive nonlinear hybridizations. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 225(2):1827-1848.
25. Colella P, Woodward PR. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54(1):174-201.
26. Zhu L, Peskin CS. Simulation of a flapping flexible filament in a flowing soap film by the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 179(2):452-468.
27. Zhu L, Peskin CS. Interaction of two flapping filaments in a flowing soap film. Physics of Fluids 2003; 15(7):1954-1960.
28. Kim Y, Zhu L, Wang X, Peskin CS. On various techniques for computer simulation of boundaries with mass. In Proceedings of the Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, Bathe KJ (ed.). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; 1746-1750.
29. Kim Y, Peskin CS. 2-D parachute simulation by the immersed boundary method. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2006; 28(6):2294-2312.
30. Kim Y, Peskin CS. Penalty immersed boundary method for an elastic boundary with mass. Physics of Fluids 2007; 19:053103 (18 pages).
31. Gresho PM, Sani RL. Incompressible Flow and the Finite Element Method: Advection-Diffusion and Isothermal Laminar Flow. Wiley: New York, 1998.
32. Berger MJ, Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82(1):64-84.
33. Minion ML. A projection method for locally refined grids. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 127(1):158-178.
34. Martin DF, Colella P. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 163(2):271-312.
35. Martin DF, Colella P, Graves D. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in three dimensions. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(3):1863-1886.
36. Elman H, Howle VE, Shadid J, Shuttleworth R, Tuminaro R. Block preconditioners based on approximate commutators. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2006; 27(5):1651-1668.
37. Elman H, Howle VE, Shadid J, Shuttleworth R, Tuminaro R. A taxonomy and comparison of parallel block multi-level preconditioners for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(3):1790-1808.
38. McCormick SF. Multilevel Adaptive Methods for Partial Differential Equations. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., 1989.
39. McCormick SF, McKay SM, Thomas JW. Computational complexity of the fast adaptive composite grid (FAC) method. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1989; 6(3):315-327.
40. McCormick SF. Multilevel Projection Methods for Partial Differential Equations. SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., 1992.
41. Berger MJ, Rigoutsos I. An algorithm for point clustering and grid generation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1991; 21(5):1278-1286.
42. Tóth G, Roe PL. Divergence- and curl-preserving prolongation and restriction formulas. Journal of Computational Physics 2002; 180(2):736-750.
43. Saad Y. A flexible inner-outer preconditioned GMRES algorithm. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1993; 14(2):461-469.
44. Bell JB, Colella P, Glaz HM. A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 85(2):257-283.
45. Almgren AS, Bell JB, Colella P, Howell LH, Welcome ML. A conservative adaptive projection method for the variable density incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 142(1):1-46.
46. Brown DL, Cortez R, Minion ML. Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 168(2):464-499.
47. Yang B, Prosperetti A. A second-order boundary-fitted projection method for free-surface flow computations. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 213(2):574-590.
48. Guermond JL, Minev P, Shen J. An overview of projection methods for incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(44-47):6011-6045.
49. Guy RD, Fogelson AL. Stability of approximate projection methods on cell-centered grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 203(2):517-538.
50. IBAMR: An adaptive and distributed-memory parallel implementation of the immersed boundary method. Available from: .
51. SAMRAI: Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Application Infrastructure. Available from.
52. Hornung RD, Kohn SR. Managing application complexity in the SAMRAI object-oriented framework. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 2002; 14(5):347-368.
53. Hornung RD, Wissink AM, Kohn SR. Managing complex data and geometry in parallel structured AMR applications. Engineering with Computers 2006; 22(3-4):181-195.
54. Balay S, Buschelman K, Gropp WD, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, McInnes LC, Smith BF, Zhang H. PETSc Web page, 2009. Available from: .
55. Balay S, Buschelman K, Eijkhout V, Gropp WD, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, McInnes LC, Smith BF, Zhang H. PETSc users manual. Technical Report ANL-95/11-Revision 3.0.0, Argonne National Laboratory, 2008.
56. Balay S, Eijkhout V, Gropp WD, McInnes LC, Smith BF. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, Arge E, Bruaset AM, Langtangen HP (eds). Birkhäuser Press: Basel, 1997; 163-202.
57. hypre: High performance preconditioners. Available from: .
58. Falgout RD, Yang UM. hypre: a library of high performance preconditioners. In Computational Science-ICCS 2002 Part III, Sloot PMA, Tan CJK, Dongarra JJ, Hoekstra AG (eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2331. Springer: Berlin, 2002; 632-641. Also available as LLNL Technical Report UCRL-JC-146175.
59. Clark RE, Finke EH. Scanning and light microscopy of human aortic leaflets in stressed and relaxed states. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1974; 67(5):792-804.
60. Shunk KA, Garot J, Atalar E, Lima JAC. Transecophageal magnetic resonance imaging of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta in patients with aortic atherosclerosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2001; 37(8):2031-2035.
61. Sauren AAHJ. The mechanical behaviour of the aortic valve. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1981.
62. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, Lim KH, Goetz W, Rice NT, Acar C, Duran CMG. Aortic and pulmonary root: are their dynamics similar? European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2002; 21(2):268-275.
63. Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology (10th edn). W. B. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A., 2000.
64. Driscol TE, Eckstein RW. Systolic pressure gradients across the aortic valve and in the ascending aorta. American Journal of Physiology 1965; 209(3):557-563.
65. Zhang L, Gerstenberger A, Wang X, Liu WK. Immersed finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193(21-22):2051-2067.
66. Liu WK, Liu Y, Farrell D, Zhang L, Wang XS, Fukui Y, Patankar N, Zhang Y, Bajaj C, Lee J. et al. Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195(13-16):1722-1749.
67. Zhang LT, Gay M. Immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interactions. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2007; 23(6):839-857.
68. Boffi D, Gastaldi L, Heltai L, Peskin CS. On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008; 197(25-28):2210-2231.
69. Griffith BE, Luo X. Immersed boundary method with finite element elasticity. Submitted, preprint. Available from: .
70. Kim H, Chandran KB, Sacks MS, Lu J. An experimentally derived stress resultant shell model for heart valve dynamic simulations. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2006; 35(1):30-44.
71. Kim H, Lu J, Sacks MS, Chandran KB. Dynamic simulation of bioprosthetic heart valves using a stress resultant shell model. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2007; 36(2):262-275.
72. May-Newman K, Lam C, Yin FCP. A hyperelastic constitutive law for aortic valve tissue. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2009; 131(8):081009 (7 pages).
73. Gundiah N, Kam K, Matthews PB, Guccione J, Dwyer HA, Saloner D, Chuter TAM, Guy TS, Ratcliffe MB, Tseng EE. Asymmetric mechanical properties of porcine aortic sinuses. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2008; 85(5):1631-1638.
74. Gundiah N, Matthews PB, Karimi R, Azadani A, Guccione J, Guy TS, Saloner D, Tseng EE. Significant material property differences between the porcine ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2008; 17(6):606-613.