A variable-density fictitious domain method for particulate flows with broad range of particle-fluid density ratios

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 243, Issue , 2013, Pages 109-129

  Apte, Sourabh V ^a   Finn, Justin R ^a  

^a Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Fictitious domain method; Fully resolved simulations; High density ratio; Particle vortex interactions; Particulate flows

Indexed keywords

FLOW OF FLUIDS; RIGIDITY;

DENSITY RATIO; FICTITIOUS DOMAIN METHOD; FLUID DENSITIES; FULLY RESOLVED SIMULATIONS; HIGH-DENSITY RATIO; PARTICLE FLUIDS; PARTICLE-VORTEX INTERACTION; PARTICULATE FLOWS; VARIABLE DENSITY; VORTEX INTERACTIONS;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 84876330201     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Sharma N., Patankar N. A fast computation technique for the direct numerical simulation of rigid particulate flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 205(2):439-457.
2. Muldowney G., Higdon J. A spectral boundary element approach to three-dimensional Stokes flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1995, 298:167-192.
3. Hu H., Patankar N., Zhu M. Direct numerical simulations of fluid-solid systems using the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian technique. Journal of Computational Physics 2001, 169(2):427-462.
4. Johnson A., Tezduyar T. Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996, 134(3-4):351-373.
5. Monaghan J. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics 2005, 68(8):1703-1759.
6. Glowinski R., Pan T., Hesla T., Joseph D., Periaux J. A fictitious domain approach to the direct numerical simulation of incompressible viscous flow past moving rigid bodies- application to particulate flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2001, 169(2):363-426.
7. Peskin C. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numerica 2003, 11:479-517.
8. Mittal R., Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2005, 37(1):239-261.
9. Uhlmann M. An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 209(2):448-476.
10. Kim D., Choi H. Immersed boundary method for flow around an arbitrarily moving body. Journal of Computational Physics 2006, 212(2):662-680.
11. Mittal R., Dong H., Bozkurttas M., Najjar F., Vargas A., Von Loebbecke A. A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 2008, 227(10):4825-4852.
12. Ladd A., Verberg R. Lattice-Boltzmann simulations of particle-fluid suspensions. Journal of Statistics Physics 2001, 104:1191-1251.
13. Feng Z., Michaelides E. Proteus: a direct forcing method in the simulations of particulate flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 202(1):20-51.
14. Zhang Z., Prosperetti A. A second-order method for three-dimensional particle simulation. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 210(1):292-324.
15. Roma A., Peskin C., Berger M. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 1999, 153(2):509-534.
16. Goldstein D., Handler R., Sirovich L. Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field. Journal of Computational Physics 1993, 105(2):354-366.
17. Udaykumar H., Mittal R., Rampunggoon P., Khanna A. A sharp interface Cartesian grid method for simulating flows with complex moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics 2001, 174(1):345-380.
18. Gibou F., Fedkiw R., Cheng L., Kang M. A second-order-accurate symmetric discretization of the Poisson equation on irregular domains. Journal of Computational Physics 2002, 176(1):205-227.
19. Kim J., Kim D., Choi H. An immersed-boundary finite-volume method for simulations of flow in complex geometries. Journal of Computational Physics 2001, 171(1):132-150.
20. Fadlun E., Verzicco R., Orlandi P., Mohd-Yusof J. Combined immersed-boundary finite-difference methods for three-dimensional complex flow simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000, 161(1):35-60.
21. Kempe T., Fröhlich J. An improved immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particle laden flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2012, 231(9):3663-3684.
22. Taira K., Colonius T. The immersed boundary method: a projection approach. Journal of Computational Physics 2007, 225(2):2118-2137.
23. Patankar N., Singh P., Joseph D., Glowinski R., Pan T. A new formulation of the distributed Lagrange multiplier/fictitious domain method for particulate flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 2000, 26(9):1509-1524.
24. Veeramani C., Minev P., Nandakumar K. A fictitious domain formulation for flows with rigid particles: a non-Lagrange multiplier version. Journal of Computational Physics 2007, 224(2):867-879.
25. Apte S., Martin M., Patankar N. A numerical method for fully resolved simulation (FRS) of rigid particle-flow interactions in complex flows. Journal of Computational Physics 2009, 228(8):2712-2738.
26. Rudman M. A volume-tracking method for incompressible multifluid flows with large density variations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1998, 28(2):357-378.
27. M. Bussmann, D. Kothe, J. Sicilian, Modeling high density ratio incompressible interfacial flows, in: Proceedings ASME-FEDSM, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 2002-31125.
28. Raessi M. A level set based method for calculating flux densities in two-phase flows. Center for Turbulence Research Annual Research Briefs 2008, 467-478.
29. Osher S., Fedkiw R. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces 2003, Springer-Verlag.
30. Osher S., Sethian J. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1988, 79(1):12-49.
31. Kim D., Choi H. A second-order time-accurate finite volume method for unsteady incompressible flow on hybrid unstructured grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2000, 162(2):411-428.
32. Mahesh K., Constantinescu G., Apte S., Iaccarino G., Ham F., Moin P. Large-eddy simulation of reacting turbulent flows in complex geometries. Journal of Applied Mechanics 2006, 73:374.
33. Patankar S. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow 1980, Taylor & Francis.
34. van der Vorst H. Iterative Krylov Methods for Large Linear Systems 2003, Cambridge University Press.
35. Roache P. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering - Transactions of the ASME 1994, 116(3):405-413.
36. Cadafalch J., Pérez-Segarra C., Consul R., Oliva A. Verification of finite volume computations on steady-state fluid flow and heat transfer. Journal of Fluids Engineering - Transactions of the ASME 2002, 124:11.
37. Celik I.B., Ghia U., Roache P.J., Freitas C.J., Coleman H., Raad P.E. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of fluids Engineering - Transactions of the ASME 2008, 130(7):078001.
38. Marella S., Krishnan S., Liu H., Udaykumar H. Sharp interface Cartesian grid method I: an easily implemented technique for 3D moving boundary computations. Journal of Computational Physics 2005, 210(1):1-31.
39. Mittal R. A Fourier-Chebyshev spectral collocation method for simulating flow past spheres and spheroids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1999, 30(7):921-937.
40. Clift R., Grace J., Weber M. Bubbles, Drops, and Particles 1978, Academic Press, New York.
41. Johnson T., Patel V. Flow past a sphere up to a Reynolds number of 300. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1999, 378:19-70.
42. ten Cate A., Nieuwstad C., Derksen J., Van den Akker H. Particle imaging velocimetry experiments and Lattice-Boltzmann simulations on a single sphere settling under gravity. Physics of Fluids 2002, 14:4012.
43. Lomholt S., Stenum B., Maxey M. Experimental verification of the force coupling method for particulate flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow 2002, 28(2):225-246.
44. Mordant N., Pinton J. Velocity measurement of a settling sphere. The European Physical Journal B 2000, 18(2):343-352.
45. Oweis G., van der Hout I., Iyer C., Tryggvason G., Ceccio S. Capture and inception of bubbles near line vortices. Physics of Fluids 2005, 17:022105.
46. Mazzitelli I., Lohse D., Toschi F. On the relevance of the lift force in bubbly turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2003, 488:283-313.
47. Climent E., Simonnet M., Magnaudet J. Preferential accumulation of bubbles in Couette-Taylor flow patterns. Physics of Fluids 2007, 19:083301.
48. Finn J., Shams E., Apte S. Modeling and simulation of multiple bubble entrainment and interactions with two dimensional vortical flows. Physics of Fluids 2011, 23(2):023301.