Binocular integration and disparity selectivity in mouse primary visual cortex

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 109, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3013-3024

  Scholl, Benjamin ^a   Burge, Johannes ^a   Priebe, Nicholas J ^a  

^a University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Disparity tuning; Mouse binocularity; Ocular dominance; Primary visual cortex

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR DISPARITY; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CAT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GEOMETRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EID: 84879151920     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01021.2012     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Anderson PA, Movshon JA. Binocular combination of contrast signals. Vision Res 29: 1115-1132, 1989.
2. Banks MS, Bennett PJ. Optical and photoreceptor immaturities limit the spatial and chromatic vision of human neonates. J Opt Soc Am A 5: 2059-2079, 1988.
3. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol 193: 327-342, 1967.
4. Beverley KI. Disparity detectors in human depth perception: evidence for directional selectivity. Science 181: 877-879, 1973.
5. Beverley KI, Regan D. Selective adaptation in stereoscopic depth perception. J Physiol 232: 40P-41P, 1973.
6. Blakemore C. Binocular depth discrimination and the nasotemporal division. J Physiol 205: 471-497, 1969.
7. Blakemore C. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J Physiol 211: 599-622, 1970.
8. Bonin V, Histed MH, Yurgenson S, Reid RC. Local diversity and fine-scale organization of receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 31: 18506-18521, 2011.
9. Brainard DH. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat Vis 10: 443-446, 1997.
10. Burge J, Geisler WS. Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108: 16849-16854, 2011.
11. Burge J, Fowlkes CC, Banks MS. Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception. J Neurosci 30: 7269-7280, 2010.
12. Chalupa LM, Lia B. The nasotemporal division of retinal ganglion cells with crossed and uncrossed projections in the fetal rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 11: 191-202, 1991.
13. Chalupa LM, Williams RW. Eye, Retina, and Visual System of the Mouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
14. Chino YM, Smith EL, Yoshida K, Cheng H, Hamamoto J. Binocular interactions in striate cortical neurons of cats reared with discordant visual inputs. J Neurosci 14: 5050-5067, 1994.
15. Dräger UC. Autoradiography of tritiated proline and fucose transported transneuronally from the eye to the visual cortex in pigmented and albino mice. Brain Res 82: 284-292, 1974.
16. Dräger UC. Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex. J Comp Neurol 160: 269-290, 1975.
17. Field DJ. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 4: 2394-2739, 1987.
18. Gao E, DeAngelis GC, Burkhalter A. Parallel input channels to mouse primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 30: 5912-5926, 2010.
19. Godement P, Salaün J, Imbert M. Prenatal and postnatal development of retinogeniculate and retinocollicular projections in the mouse. J Comp Neurol 230: 552-575, 1984.
20. Gordon JA, Stryker MP. Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. J Neurosci 16: 3274-3286, 1996.
21. Hanover JL, Huang ZJ, Tonegawa S, Stryker MP. Brain-derived neu-rotrophic factor overexpression induces precocious critical period in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 19: RC40, 1999.
22. Held RT, Cooper EA, Banks MS. Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth. Curr Biol 22: 426-431, 2012.
23. Heesy CP. On the relationship between orbit orientation and binocular visual field overlap in mammals. Anat Rec A 281A: 1104-1110, 2004.
24. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. J Vis 4:967-992, 2004.
25. Hirsch JA, Alonso JM, Reid RC, Martinez LM. Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J Neurosci 18: 9517-9528, 1998.
26. Hofer SB, Mrsic-Flogel TD, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Prior experience enhances plasticity in adult visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 9: 127-132, 2006.
27. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154, 1962.
28. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. A re-examination of stereoscopic mechanisms in area 17 of the cat. J Physiol 232: 29P-30P, 1973.
29. Huberman AD, Niell CM. What can mice tell us about how vision works? Trends Neurosci 34: 464-473, 2011.
30. Joshua DE. Binocular single vision and depth discrimination. Receptive field disparities for central and peripheral vision and binocular interaction on peripheral single units in cat. Exp Brain Res 10: 389-416, 1970.
31. Kalatsky VA, Stryker MP. New paradigm for optical imaging: temporally encoded maps of intrinsic signal. Neuron 38: 529-545, 2003.
32. de la Cera EG, Rodríguez G, Llorente L, Schaeffel F, Marcos S. Optical aberrations in the mouse eye. Vision Res 46: 2546-2553, 2006.
33. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 35: 389-412, 1995.
34. Leamey CA, Protti DA. Comparative survey of the mammalian visual system with reference to the mouse. In: Eye, Retina, and Visual System of the Mouse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
35. Legge GE. Binocular contrast summation. I. Detection and discrimination. Vision Res 24: 373-383, 1984.
36. LeVay S, Voigt T. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1: 395-414, 1988.
37. Liu B, Li P, Sun YJ, Li Y, Zhang LI, Tao HW. Intervening inhibition underlies simple-cell receptive field structure in visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 13: 89-96, 2010.
38. Mangini NJ, Pearlman AL. Laminar distribution of receptive field properties in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 193: 203-222, 1980.
39. Métin C, Godement P, Imbert M. The primary visual cortex in the mouse: receptive field properties and functional organization. Exp Brain Res 69: 594-612, 1988.
40. Mrsic-Flogel TD, Hofer SB, Ohki K, Reid RC, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Homeostatic regulation of eye-specific responses in visual cortex during ocular dominance plasticity. Neuron 54: 961-972, 2007.
41. Nieder A, Wagner H. Horizontal-disparity tuning of neurons in the visual forebrain of the behaving barn owl. J Neurophysiol 83: 2967-2979, 2000.
42. Nieder A, Wagner H. Hierarchical procession of horizontal disparity information in the visual forebrain of behaving owls. J Neurosci 21: 4514-4522, 2001.
43. Niell CM, Stryker MP. Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex. J Neurosci 28: 7520-7536, 2008.
44. Nikara T, Bishop PO, Pettigrew JD. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 6: 353-372, 1968.
45. Ohzawa I. Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8: 509-515, 1998.
46. Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 56: 221-242, 1986.
47. Packwood J, Gordon B. Stereopsis in normal domestic cat, Siamese cat, and cat raised with alternating monocular occlusion. J Neurophysiol 38: 1485-1499, 1975.
48. Pardhan S, Rose D. Binocular and monocular detection of Gabor patches in binocular two-dimensional noise. Perception 28: 203-215, 1999.
49. Pelli DG. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10: 437-442, 1997.
50. Perry VH, Oehler R, Cowey A. Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience 12: 1101-1123, 1984.
51. Pettigrew JD. Evolution of binocular vision. In: Visual Neuroscience, edited by Pettigrew JD, Sanderson KJ, Levick WR. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1986, p. 208-222.
52. Pettigrew J, Konishi M. Neurons selective for orientation and binocular disparity in the visual Wulst of the barn owl (Tyto alba). Science 193: 675-678, 1976a.
53. Pettigrew JD, Konishi M. Effect of monocular deprivation on binocular neurones in the owl's visual Wulst. Nature 264: 753-754, 1976b.
54. Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, Bishop PO. Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res 6: 391-410, 1968.
55. Priebe NJ. The relationship between subthreshold and suprathreshold ocular dominance in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 28: 8553-8559, 2008.
56. Priebe NJ, Ferster D. Mechanisms underlying cross-orientation suppression in cat visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 9: 552-561, 2006.
57. Priebe NJ, Ferster D. Inhibition, spike threshold, and stimulus selectivity in primary visual cortex. Neuron 57: 482-497, 2008.
58. Ringach DL, Shapley RM, Hawken MJ. Orientation selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence. J Neurosci 22: 5639-5651, 2002.
59. Sarnaik R, Wang BS, Cang J. Experience-dependent and independent binocular correspondence of receptive field subregions in mouse visual cortex. Cereb Cortex (February 6, 2013). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht027.
60. Scholl B, Priebe NJ. Monocular inputs linearly combine to generate binocular responses in simple cells of primary visual cortex (Abstract). Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, 2011.
61. Schuett S, Bonhoeffer T, Hübener M. Mapping retinotopic structure in mouse visual cortex with optical imaging. J Neurosci 22: 6549-6559, 2002.
62. Simpson AJ, Fitter MJ. What is the best index of detectability? Psychol Bull 80: 481-488, 1973.
63. Simpson WA, Manahilov V, Shahani U. Two eyes: square root 2 better than one? Acta Psychol (Amst) 131: 93-98, 2009.
64. Swets JA. Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance. Psychol Bull 99: 181-198, 1986.
65. Tagawa Y, Kanold PO, Majdan M, Shatz CJ. Multiple periods of functional ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 8: 380-388, 2005.
66. Tan AY, Brown BD, Scholl B, Mohanty D, Priebe NJ. Orientation selectivity of synaptic input to neurons in mouse and cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 31: 12339-12350, 2011.
67. Vreysen S, Zhang B, Chino YM, Arckens L, Van den Bergh G. Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in mouse visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 107: 2937-2949, 2012.
68. Wagor E, Mangini NJ, Pearlman AL. Retinotopic organization of striate and extrastriate visual cortex in the mouse. J Comp Neurol 193: 187-202, 1980.
69. Wallace GK. Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria Forskål. J Exp Biol 36: 512-525, 1959.
70. Wang BS, Sarnaik R, Cang J. Critical period plasticity matches binocular orientation preference in the visual cortex. Neuron 65: 246-256, 2010.
71. van der Willigen RF, Frost BJ, Wagner H. Stereoscopic depth perception in the owl. Neuroreport 9: 1233-1237, 1998.