Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: The disparity energy model

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 509-515

  Ohzawa, Izumi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EYE MOVEMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0032143474     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(98)80039-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond). 193:1967;327-342.
2. Poggio GF, Fischer B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving Rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 40:1977;1392-1405.
3. Poggio GF, Motter BC, Squatrito S, Trotter Y. Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms. Vision Res. 25:1985;397-406.
4. Julesz B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception. 1971;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
5. Marr D, Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]. 204:1979;301-328.
6. Marr D. Vision. 1982;WH Freeman, New York.
7. Ferster D. A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 311:1981;623-655.
8. LeVay S, Voigt T. Ocular dominance and disparity coding in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 1:1988;395-414.
9. Poggio GF, Gonzalez F, Krause F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J Neurosci. 8:1988;4531-4550.
10. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science. 249:1990;1037-1041.
11. Qian N. Computing stereo disparity and motion with known binocular cell properties. Neural Computation. 6:1994;390-404.
12. Zhu YD, Qian N. Binocular receptive field models, disparity tuning, and characteristic disparity. Neural Computation. 8:1996;1611-1641.
13. Fleet DJ, Wagner H, Heeger DJ. Encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res. 36:1996;1839-1857.
14. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. of special interest J Neurophysiol. 77:1997;2879-2909 Extensive analyses of binocular RFs of V1 complex cells and examinations of the validity of the disparity energy model are presented. It describes a highly specific neural wiring scheme by which output of multiple simple cells are combined to produce an efficient sensor for binocular disparity. Comparisons of the physiological data and predictions of the model show generally excellent agreement.
15. Qian N, Zhu Y. Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Res. 37:1997;1811-1827.
16. Qian N, Andersen RA. A physiological model for motion-stereo integration and a unified explanation of the Pulfrich-like phenomena. Vision Res. 37:1997;1683-1698 This theoretical study unifies the models for V1 complex cells in the joint domain of motion and stereoscopic perception. The authors view complex cells as sensors for both motion energy [29,30] and disparity energy [10-13,14] Physiological evidence in support of the joint model has begun to emerge (A Anzai, I Ohzawa, RD Freeman, Soc Neurosci Abstr 1997, 23:567).
17. of special interest McLoughlin NP, Grossberg S. Cortical computation of stereo disparity. Vision Res. 38:1998;91-99.
18. Gray MS, Pouget A, Zemel RS, Nowlan SJ, Sejnowski TJ. Reliable disparity estimation through selective integration. Visual Neurosci. 15:1998;511-528.
19. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Nature. 389:1997;280-283 This is the first demonstration that the disparity energy model predicts well the responses of monkey V1 cells to dynamic random-dot stereograms (RDSs). Qian and colleagues [11,12,15] were the first to predict this outcome. An emphasis is placed on conscious perception of depth, motivated by a recent surge in interest in our awareness of neural activities [20]. This paper shows that V1 complex cells do not support the conscious perception of depth, as they respond to reversed-contrast RDS for which we cannot perceive any depth [21].
20. of special interest Crick F, Koch C. Are we aware of neural activity in primary visual cortex? Nature. 375:1995;121-123.
21. Cogan AI, Lomakin AJ, Rossi AF. Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay. Vision Res. 33:1993;1959-1975.
22. Cogan AI, Kontsevich LL, Lomakin AJ, Halpern DL, Blake R. Binocular density processing with opposite-contrast stimuli. Perception. 24:1995;33-47.
23. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 195:1968;215-243.
24. Tanaka K, Saito H, Fukada Y, Moriya M. Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 66:1991;170-189.
25. Ito M, Fujita I, Tamura H, Tanaka K. Processing of contrast polarity of visual images in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex. 4:1994;499-508.
26. Adelson EH, Movshon JA. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature. 300:1982;523-525.
27. Morgan MJ, Castet E. The aperture problem in stereopsis. Vision Res. 37:1997;2737-2744 This work represents the first detailed psychophysical examination of an aperture problem for stereopsis. The aperture problem refers to an ambiguity that results from viewing images through an aperture, and has been studied extensively in relation to motion perception. For example, one cannot determine the true direction of motion of a grating pattern if viewed through an aperture (e.g. see Figure 4a, top). An RF of a visual neuron is an aperture. Therefore, if the RF truly has no sensitivity to stimuli outside the RF, it suffers from an aperture problem. In general, however, the visual system is able to solve the aperture problem because it is able to utilize responses of many neurons.
28. of special interest Masson GS, Busettini C, Miles FA. Vergence eye movements in response to binocular disparity without depth perception. of special interest Nature. 389:1997;283-286 Although we do not perceive depth from reversed-contrast stereograms, the vergence eye movement system, remarkably, responds to such stimuli. Short latencies in the response suggest that V1 complex cells may be an important source of the signal for this vergence response.
29. Adelson EH, Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am [A]. 2:1985;284-299.
30. Emerson RC, Bergen JR, Adelson EH. Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Res. 32:1992;203-218.