Dual-task performance is differentially modulated by rewards and punishments

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 250, Issue , 2013, Pages 304-307

  Yildiz, Ali ^a   Chmielewski, Witold ^a   Beste, Christian ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dopamine; Dual task; Psychological refractory period (PRP); Punishment; Response selection; Reward

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNISHMENT; REFRACTORY PERIOD; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PUNISHMENT; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879136155     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 116:220-244.
2. Welford A.T. The psychological refractory period and the timing of high-speed performance: a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology 1952, 43:2-19.
3. Pashler H. Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:358-377.
4. Wu C., Liu Y. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP). Psychological Review 2008, 115:913-954.
5. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
6. Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:3-18.
7. Navon D., Miller J.K. Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 44:193-251.
8. Durstewitz D., Seamans J.K. The dual-state theory of prefrontal cortex dopamine function with relevance to catechol-o-methyltransferase genotypes and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry 2008, 64:739-749.
9. Seamans J.K., Yang C.R. The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex. Progress in Neurobiology 2004, 74:1-58.
10. Schultz W., Tremblay L., Hollerman J.R. Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cerebral Cortex 2000, 10:272-284.
11. Kravitz A.V., Tye L.D., Kreitzer A.C. Distinct roles for direct and indirect pathway striatal neurons in reinforcement. Nature 2012, 15:816-818.
12. Bromberg-Martin E.S., Matsumoto M., Hikosaka O. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 2010, 68:815-834.
13. Ferguson S.M., Eskenazi D., Ishikawa M., Wanat M.J., Phillips P.E., Dong Y., Roth B.L., Neumaier J.F. Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization. Nature Neuroscience 2011, 14:22-24.
14. Hikida T., Kimura K., Wada N., Funabiki K., Nakanishi S. Distinct roles of synaptic transmission in direct and indirect striatal pathways to reward and aversive behavior. Neuron 2010, 66:896-907.
15. Wichmann T., DeLong M.R. Functional neuroanatomy of the basal ganglia in Parkinson's disease. Advances in Neurology 2003, 91:9-18.
16. Gerfen C.R., Surmeier D.J. Modulation of striatal projection systems by dopamine. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2011, 34:441-466.
17. Cisek P., Kalaska J.F. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2010, 33:269-298.
18. Chakravarthy V.S., Joseph D., Bapi R.S. What do the basal ganglia do? A modeling perspective. Biological Cybernetics 2010, 103:237-253.
19. Redgrave P., Prescott T.J., Gurney K. The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem. Neuroscience 1999, 89:1009-1023.
20. Humphries M.D., Stewart R.D., Gurney K.N. A physiologically plausible model of action selection and oscillatory activity in the basal ganglia. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:12921-21242.
21. Frank M.J. Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: a neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and nonmedicated Parkinsonism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:51-72.
22. Jentzsch I., Leuthold H., Ulrich R. Decomposing sources of response slowing in the PRP paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:610-626.
23. Sigman M., Dehaene S. Dynamics of the central bottleneck: dual-task and task uncertainty. PLoS Biology 2006, 4:e220.
24. Lien M.C., Proctor R.W. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Reviews 2002, 9:212-238.
25. Borger R. The refractory period and serial choice-reactions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1963, 15:1-12.
26. Fischer R., Hommel B. Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance. Cognition 2012, 123:303-307.
27. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:313-327.
28. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5:297-323.