Overtreatment in a see-and-treat approach to cervical intraepithelial lesions

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1209-1216

  Bosgraaf, Remko P ^a   Mast, Peter Paul ^a   Struik Van Der Zanden, Petronella H T H ^a   Bulten, Johan ^a   Massuger, Leon F A G ^a   Bekkers, Ruud L M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COLPOSCOPY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT REFERRAL; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERUS SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84879121969     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318293ab22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893-917.
2. Baron RC, Melillo S, Rimer BK, Coates RJ, Kerner J, Habarta N, et al. Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers: a systematic review of provider reminders. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:110-7.
3. Rebolj M, van Ballegooijen M, Berkers LM, Habbema D. Monitoring a national cancer prevention program: successful changes in cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands. Int J Cancer 2007;120:806-12.
4. Council NHI. Starting points for the restructuring of the organised cervical cancer screening programme-final decision [in Dutch]. Amstelveen (The Netherlands): ZiekenfondsRaad; 1993.
5. Gustafsson L, Ponten J, Zack M, Adami HO. International incidence rates of invasive cervical cancer after introduction of cytological screening. Cancer Causes Control 1997;8:755-63.
6. de Kok IM, van der Aa MA, van Ballegooijen M, Siesling S, Karim-Kos HE, van Kemenade FJ, et al. Trends in cervical cancer in the Netherlands until 2007: has the bottom been reached? Int J Cancer 2011;128:2174-81.
7. LEBA. Landelijke Evaluatie van het Bevolkingsonderzoek naar Baarmoederhalskanker. [National Cervical Screening Program Evaluation] Rapportage 2006-2010. 2011. Available at: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource? objectid5rivmp:59404&type5org&disposition5inline&ns-nc51. Retrieved February 27, 2013.
8. Holschneider CH, Ghosh K, Montz FJ. See-and-treat in the management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: a resource utilization analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:377-85.
9. Balasubramani L, Orbell S, Hagger M, Brown V, Tidy J. Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy? BJOG 2007;114:39-45.
10. Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, Whittaker L, Rhodes-Morris H, Silva E. A randomized clinical trial of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:737-44.
11. Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62.
12. Cardenas-Turanzas M, Follen M, Benedet JL, Cantor SB. See-and-treat strategy for diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:43-50.
13. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367:489-98.
14. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;337: a1284.
15. Bulk S, Van Kemenade FJ, Rozendaal L, Meijer CJ. The Dutch CISOE-A framework for cytology reporting increases efficacy of screening upon standardisation since 1996. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:388-93.
16. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9.
17. Keijser KG, Kenemans P, van der Zanden PH, Schijf CP, Vooijs GP, Rolland R Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: diagnosis and treatment in one procedure. AmJ Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1281-7.
18. Briet MC, Berger TH, van Ballegooijen M, Boon ME, Rebolj M. Effects of streamlining cervical cancer screening the Dutch way: consequences of changes in the Dutch KOPAC-based follow-up protocol and consensus-based limitation of equivocal cytology. Acta Cytol 2010;54:1095-100.
19. Bigrigg MA Codling BW, Pearson P, Read MD, Swingler GR. Colposcopic diagnosis and treatment of cervical dysplasia at a single clinic visit. Experience of low-voltage diathermy loop in 1000 patients. Lancet 1990;336:229-31.
20. Hallam NF, West J, Harper C, Edwards A Hope S, Merriman H, et al. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) as an alternative to both local ablative and cone biopsy treatment: a series of 1000 patients. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:77-82.
21. Kjellberg L, Tavelin B. 'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:1140-4.
22. Darwish A, Gadallah H. One-step management of cervical lesions. IntJ Gynaecol Obstet 1998;61:261-7.
23. TOMBOLA Group. Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2009;339:b2548.
24. Das SS, Elias AH. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a single visit. Aust N ZJ Obstet Gynaecol 1998;38:246-50.
25. Numnum TM, Kirby TO, Leath CA 3rd, Huh WK, Alvarez RD, Straughn JM Jr. A prospective evaluation of 'see and treat' in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy? J Low Genit Tract Dis 2005;9:2-6.
26. Dunn TS, Burke M, Shwayder J. A 'see and treat' management for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap smears. J Lower Genit Tract Dis 2003;7:104-6.
27. Szurkus DC, Harrison TA. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1180-2.
28. van Ballegooijen M, van den Akker-van Marle E, Patnick J, Lynge E, Arbyn M, Anttila A et al. Overview of important cervical cancer screening process values in European Union (EU) countries, and tentative predictions of the corresponding effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:2177-88.
29. van Ballegooijen M, Koopmanschap MA, van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD, Lubbe KT, van Agt HM. Diagnostic and treatment procedures induced by cervical cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 1990;26:941-5.
30. Sadan O, Yarden H, Schejter E, Bilavski E, Bachar R Lurie S. Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a 'see and treat' versus a three-step approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;131:73-5.
31. Denny LA, Soeters R Dehaeck K, Bloch B. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:545-8.
32. Li ZG, Qian de Y, Cen JM, Chen GD, Shu YH. Three-step versus 'see-and-treat' approach in women with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in a low-resource country. IntJ Gynaecol Obstet 2009;106:202-5.
33. Fung HY, Cheung LP, Rogers MS, To KF. The treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia: when could we 'see and loop.' Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;72:199-204.
34. Cantor SB, Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Bratka CS, Bodurka DC, Richards-Kortum R Cost-effectiveness analysis of diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:270-7.