'See and treat' regime by LEEP conisation is a safe and time saving procedure among women with cytological high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1140-1144

  Kjellberg, Lennart ^a   Tavelin, Björn ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Follow up; High grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Loop electrosurgical excision procedure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DYSPLASIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH GRADE SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL LESION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOOP ELECTROSURGICAL EXCISION PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCH BIOPSY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; RISK FACTORS; SAFETY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 34548303941     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340701505267     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gustavsson L, Ponten J, Zack M, Adami HO. International incidence rates of invasive cancer after introduction of cytologic screening. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8:755-63.
2. Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edvards RP, Nauman RW, Partridge EE, Shingleton HM, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;52:175-9.
3. Buxton EJ, Luesley DM, Shafi MI, Rollason M. Colposopically directed punch biopsy: a potentially misleading investigation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:1273-6.
4. Barker B, Garcia FA, Warner J, Lozerski J, Hatch K. Baseline inaccuracy rates for the comparison of cervical biopsy to loop electrosurgical excision histopathologic diagnoses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:349-52.
5. Dennis C, Surkus MD, Terry A, Harrison MD. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1180-2.
6. Massad SL, Markwell S, Cejtin HE, Collins Y. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasian among young women with abnormal screening cytology. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9:225-9.
7. Berdishevsky L, Karmin R, Chuang L. Treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a 2- versus 3-step approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1424-6.
8. Numnum TM, Kirby O, Leath CA 3rd, Huh WK, Alvarez RD, Straughn JM Jr. A prospective evaluation of 'see and treat' i.n women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9:2-6.
9. Robinson WR, Lud ED, Adams J. The predictive value of LEEP specimen margin status for residual/recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1998;8:109-12.
10. Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, Niv J, Kupferminc MJ, Bornstei J, et al. Combined colposcopy, loop conisation, and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:47-51.
11. Johnson N, Khalili M, Hirschowitz L, Rali F, Porter R. Predicting residual disease after excision of cervical dysplasia. BJOG. 2003;110:952-5.
12. Gonzales DI Jr, Zah CM, Retzloff MG, Moore WF, Kost ER, Snyder RR. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:315-21.
13. Brockmeyer AD, Jason D, Wright JD, Gao F, Powell MA. Persistent and recurrent cervical dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1379-8.
14. Gardeil F, Berry-Walsh C, Prendivilie W, Clinch J, Turner MJ. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:419-22.
15. Shafi MI, Dunn JA, Buxton EJ, Finn CB, Jordan JA, Luesley DM. Abnormal cervical cytology following large loop excision of the transformation zone: a case controlled study. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;100:145-8.
16. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Role of loop electrosurgical excision procedure in the evaluation of abnormal test results. Washington, DC: The College; 1993. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 195.
17. Szurkus DC, Harrison TA. Loop excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cytology: correlation with colposcopic and histologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1180-2.
18. Cardenas-Turanzas M, Follen M, Benedet JL, Cantor SB. See-and-treat strategy for diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:43-50.
19. Östör AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1993;12:186-92.
20. Sjoborg K, Vistad I, Myhr SS, Svenningsen R, Herzog C, Kloster-Jensen A, et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:423-8.
21. Balasubramani L, Orbell S, Hagger M, Brown V, Tidy J. Do women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prefer a see and treat option in colposcopy? BJOG. 2007;114:39-45.