Digital breast tomosynthesis

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1415-1417

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84879115923     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000431055.71711.dc     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Autier P, Koechlin A, Smans M, Vatten L, Boniol M. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:1080-93.
2. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. US Preventive Services Task Force [published errata appear in Ann Intern Med 2010;152:688;
3. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:199-200].
4. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716-26, W-236.
5. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, Eisen A, Shumak R, Plewes D. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:671-9.
6. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group [published erratum appears in CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:185].
7. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:75-89.
8. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) Investigators Group [published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 2006;355:1840].
9. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83.
10. Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 1992;183:629-30.
11. Smith A. Full-field breast tomosynthesis. Radiol Manage 2005;27:25-31.
12. Williams MB, Judy PG, Gunn S, Majewski S. Dualmodality breast tomosynthesis. Radiology 2010;255:191-8.
13. Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology 2013; 266:104-13.
14. Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Kelly AE, Catullo VJ, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions. Radiology 2013;266:89-95.
15. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013; DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12121373.
16. Hendrick RE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology 2010;257:246-53.
17. Feng SS, Sechopoulos I. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. Radiology 2012;263:35-42.