Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis

Radiology

Volumn 255, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 191-198

  Williams, Mark B ^a   Judy, Patricia G ^a   Gunn, Spencer ^a   Majewski, Stanislaw ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CARCINOMA IN SITU; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DUAL MODALITY TOMOSYNTHESIS; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYBRID SCANNER; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCAR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GAMMA CAMERAS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNETIUM TC 99M SESTAMIBI;

EID: 77950411886     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09091160     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 part 1):347-360.
2. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(3):168-175. [Published correction appears in Ann Intern Med 2003;138(9):771.]
3. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(6):1675-1679.
4. Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, et al. Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008;100(12):876-887.
5. Saunders RS Jr, Samei E, Lo JY, Baker JA. Can compression be reduced for breast tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo study on mass and microcalcification conspicuity in tomosynthesis. Radiology 2009;251(3):673-682.
6. Cutrone JA, Yospur LS, Khalkhali I, et al. Immunohistologic assessment of technetium-99m-MIBI uptake in benign and malignant breast lesions. J Nucl Med 1998;39(3):449-453.
7. Sergieva SB, Timcheva KV, Hadjiolov ND. 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy as a functional method for the evaluation of multidrug resistance in breast cancer patients. J BUON 2006;11(1):61-68.
8. Kim IJ, Bae YT, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Kim DS, Lee JS. Determination and prediction of P-glycoprotein and multidrug-resistance-related protein expression in breast cancer with double-phase technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography: visual and quantitative analyses. Oncology 2006;70(6):403-410.
9. Jekerle V, Klinkhammer W, Scollard DA, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of WK-X-34, a novel inhibitor of P-glycoprotein and BCRP, using radio imaging techniques. Int J Cancer 2006;119(2):414-422.
10. Piwnica-Worms D, Kesarwala AH, Pichler A, Prior JL, Sharma V. Single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging of multi-drug resistant P-glycoprotein: monitoring a transport activity important in cancer, blood-brain barrier function and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006;16(4):575-589, viii.
11. Allen MW, Hendi P, Schwimmer J, Bassett L, Gambhir SS. Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies. Q J Nucl Med 2000;44(2):168-185.
12. Buscombe JR, Cwikla JB, Holloway B, Hilson AJ. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves. J Nucl Med 2001;42(1):3-8.
13. Palmedo H, Biersack HJ, Lastoria S, et al. Scintimammography with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile: results of a prospective European multicentre trial. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(4):375-385.
14. Scopinaro F, Schillaci O, Ussof W, et al. A three center study on the diagnostic accuracy of 99mTc-MIBI scintimammography. Anticancer Res 1997;17(3B):1631-1634.
15. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, et al. Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer. Radiology 2005;237(1):274-280.
16. Brem RF, Fishman M, Rapelyea JA. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study. Acad Radiol 2007;14(8):945-950.
17. Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, Rhodes DJ, O'Connor MK. Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(6):1805-1815.
18. Cinti MN, Pani R, Pellegrini R, et al. Tumor SNR analysis in scintimammography by dedicated high contrast imager. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50(5):1618-1623.
19. Hruska CB, O'Connor MK. Effect of collimator selection on tumor detection for dedicated nuclear breast imaging systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006;53(5):2680-2689.
20. Majewski S, Kieper D, Curran E, et al. Optimization of dedicated scintimammography procedure using detector prototypes and compressible phantoms. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2001;48(3):822-829.
21. More MJ, Goodale PJ, Majewski S, Williams MB. Evaluation of gamma cameras for use in dedicated breast imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2006;53(5):2675-2679.
22. Pani R, Bennati P, Cinti MN, et al. Imaging characteristics comparison of compact pixellated detectors for scintimammography. Nucl Sci Sympos Conf Rec 2004;6:3748-3751.
23. Stebel L, Carrato S, Cautero G, et al. A modular prototype detector for scintimammography imaging. Nucl Sci Sympos Conf Rec 2005;5:3027-3031.
24. Brem RF, Petrovitch I, Rapelyea JA, Young H, Teal C, Kelly T. Breast-specific gamma imaging with 99mTc-Sestamibi and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a comparative study. Breast J 2007;13(5):465-469.
25. Brem RF, Ioffe M, Rapelyea JA, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: detection with mammography, sonography, MRI, and breast-specific gamma imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(2):379-383.
26. Hruska CB, Boughey JC, Phillips SW, et al. Scientific Impact Recognition Award: molecular breast imaging - a review of the Mayo Clinic experience. Am J Surg 2008;196(4):470-476.
27. Zhou M, Johnson N, Gruner S, et al. Clinical utility of breast-specific gamma imaging for evaluating disease extent in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient. Am J Surg 2009;197(2):159-163.
28. More MJ, Heng L, Goodale PJ, et al. Limited angle dual modality breast imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2007;54(3):504-513.
29. Williams M, Judy PG, More MJ, et al. Tomographic dual modality breast scanner. In: Krupinski EA, ed. Digital mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2008;99-107.
30. Williams MB, More MJ, Narayanan D, et al. Combined structural and functional imaging of the breast. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2002;1(1):39-42.
31. Williams MB, More MJ, Narayanan D, et al. Phantom study of radiotracer concentration quantification in breast scintigraphy. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50(3):433-438.
32. More MJ, Narayanan D, Goodale PJ, Harvey J, Williams MB. Analysis of spatial correlation between 99mTc-Sestamibi uptake and radiographic breast density. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4(3):265-273.
33. Dobbins JT 3rd, Godfrey DJ. Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys Med Biol 2003;48(19):R65-R106.
34. Williams MB, Simoni PU, Smilowitz L, Stanton M, Phillips W, Stewart A. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography. Med Phys 1999;26(11):2273-2285.
35. Williams MB, Narayanan D, More MJ, Goodale PJ, Majewski S, Kieper DA. Analysis of position-dependent Compton scatter in scintimammography with mild compression. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50(5):1643-1649.
36. Miraluma [drug data sheet]. North Billerica, Mass: Bristol-Myers Squibb Medical Imaging, 2009.
37. Williams MB, Raghunathan P, More MJ, et al. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. Med Phys 2008;35(6):2414-2423.
38. Crotty DJ, McKinley RL, Tornai MP. Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography. Phys Med Biol 2007;52(3):603-616.
39. Brzymialkiewicz CN, Tornai MP, McKinley RL, Cutler SJ, Bowsher JE. Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes. Phys Med Biol 2006;51(19):5051-5064.
40. Bowen SL, Wu Y, Chaudhari AJ, et al. Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging. J Nucl Med 2009;50(9):1401-1408.
41. Sinha SP, Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, et al. Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with x-ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound. Conf Proc: IEEE Eng Med & Bio Soc 2007;2007:1335-1338.
42. Hardesty LA, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Cohen CS, Clearfield RJ, Gur D. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms. Acad Radiol 2005;12(3):286-290.