Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 15-22

  Antoniou, Stavros A ^a,b   Antoniou, George A ^a   Koch, Oliver O ^c   Pointner, Rudolph ^c   Granderath, Frank A ^a  

^a Hospital Neuwerk   (Germany)

^b MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c General Public Hospital Zell am See   (Austria)

Author keywords

Duodenal ulcer; Gastric ulcer; Laparoscopy; Metaanalysis; Peptic ulcer disease; Perforated peptic ulcer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878982760     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/108680812X13517013317752     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Nathanson LK, Easter WT, Cushieri A. Laparoscopic repair/ peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1990;4:232-233.
2. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1006.
3. Coghlan JG, Gilligan D, Humphries H, et al. Campylobacter pylori and recurrence of duodenal ulcers-a 12-month follow-up study. Lancet. 1987;2:1109-1111.
4. Bhogal RH, Athwal R, Durkin D, Deakin M, Cheruvu CN. Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease. World J Surg. 2008;32:2371-2374.
5. Ates M, Sevil S, Bakircioglu E, Colak C. Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2007;17: 615-619.
6. Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1995; 82:814-816.
7. Bashinskaya B, Nahed BV, Redjal N, Kahle KT, Walcott BP. Trends in peptic ulcer disease and the identification of Helicobacter pylori as a causative organism: Population-based estimates from the US nationwide inpatient sample. J Glob Infect Dis. 2011;3:366-370.
8. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1195-1207.
9. Karantonis FF, Nikiteas N, Perrea D, et al. Evaluation of the effects of laparotomy and laparoscopy on the immune system in intra-abdominal sepsis-a review. J Invest Surg. 2008;21:330-339.
10. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
11. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:2700.
12. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg. 1996;224: 131-138.
13. Lau JY, Lo SY, Ng EK, Lee DW, Lam YH, Chung SC. A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving laparoscopic or open patch repair. Am J Surg. 1998;175:325-327.
14. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002;235:313-319.
15. Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009;33: 1368-1373.
16. Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK, Tang CN, Ha PY, Li MK. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:481-484.
17. Lagoo S, McMahon RL, Kahikara M, Pappas TN, Eubanks S. The sixth decision regarding perforated duodenal ulcer. JSLS. 2002;6:359-368.
18. Ng EK, Lam YH, Sung JJ, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation: Randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2000;231:153-158.
19. Tomtitchong P, Siribumrungwong B, Vilaichone RK, Kasetsuwan P, Matsukura N, Chaiyakunapruk N. Systematic review and meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Helicobacter. 2012; 17:148-152.
20. Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987;205:22-26.
21. Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Chan S, Booth RJ, Hill AG. The humoral response after laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2010;164:28-37.
22. Schietroma M, Piccione F, Carlei F, et al. Peritonitis from perforated appendicitis: stress response after laparoscopic or open treatment. Am Surg. 2012;78:582-590.
23. Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1017-1020.
24. Wong DC, Siu WT, Wong SK, Tai YP, Li MK. Routine laparoscopic single-stitch omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer: Experience from 338 cases. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:457-458.
25. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K. Community-based evaluation of laparoscopic versus open simple closure of perforated peptic ulcers. World J Surg. 2011;35:2485-2492.
26. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:413-420.
27. Lam CM, Yuen AW, Chik B, Wai AC, Fan ST. Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: A population-based study. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:774-779.