Rage against the machine: A reply to professors bierschbach and bibas

Minnesota Law Review

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 2245-2271

  Luna, Erik ^a  

^a School of Law   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878965560     PISSN: 00265535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (88)

1. Albert W. Alschuler, Two Ways to Think About the Punishment of Corporations, 46 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1359, 1389 n.167 (2009)
2. Rachel E. Barkow, Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law, 61 STAN. L. REV. 869 (2009)
3. Stephanos Bibas, Prosecuto-rial Regulation Versus Prosecutorial Accountability, 157 U. PA. L. REV. 959 (2009)
4. Erik Luna, Principled Enforcement of Penal Codes, 4 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 515 (2000)
5. Marvin E. Frankel, Criminal Sentences: Law Without Order (1973)
6. Albert W. Alschuler, The Prose-cutor's Role in Plea Bargaining, 36 U. CHI. L. REV. 50 (1968)
7. Herman Gold-stein, Police Discretion: The Ideal Versus the Real, 23 PUB. ADMIN. REV. 140 (1963)
8. Joseph Goldstein, Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice, 69 YALE L.J. 543 (1960)
9. Sanford H. Kadish, Legal Norm and Discretion in the Police and Sen-tencing Processes, 75 HARV. L. REV. 904 (1962)
10. John Kaplan, The Prosecutori-al Discretion-A Comment, 60 NW. U. L. REV. 174 (1965)
11. Wayne R. LaFave, The Prosecutor's Discretion in the United States, 18 AM. J. COMP. L. 532 (1970)
12. Carl McGowan, Rule-Making and the Police, 70 MICH. L. REV. 659 (1972)
13. James Vorenberg, Narrowing the Discretion of Criminal Justice Offi-cials, 1976 DUKE L.J. 651
14. Kenneth Culp Davis, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (1969)
15. Kenneth Culp Davis, Police Discretion (1975)
16. Kenneth Culp Davis, An Approach to Legal Control of the Police, 52 TEX. L. REV. 703 (1974)
17. Norman Abrams, Internal Policy: Guiding the Exercise of Pros-ecutorial Discretion, 19 UCLA L. REV. 1, 3-10, 34 n.108 (1971).
18. United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741, 743-44, 749-55 (1979)
19. Wayne R. LaFave, Controlling Discretion by Administrative Regulations: The Use, Misuse, and Nonuse of Police Rules and Policies in Fourth Amendment Adjudication, 89 MICH. L. REV. 442, 442-51 (1990)
20. Stephen J. Schulhofer, Criminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory System, 17 J. LEGAL STUD. 43, 43-49 (1988)
21. Richard A. Bierschbach and Stephanos Bibas, Notice-and-Comment Sen-tencing, 97 MINN. L. REV. 1, 3-4 (2012).
22. 5 U.S.C. 553(c) (2006).
23. Marc L. Miller and Ronald F. Wright, Reporting For Duty: The Uni-Versal Prosecutorial Accountability Puzzle And An Experimental Transparency Alternative, In The Prosecutor In Transnational Perspective,
24. Ronald F. Wright and Marc L. Miller, The Worldwide Ac-countability Deficit for Prosecutors, 67 WASH. and LEE L. REV. 1587 (2010).
25. Julian V. Roberts and Loretta J. Stalans, Public Opinion, Crime, And Criminal Justice 23-47 (1997)
26. Deborah W. Denno, The Perils of Public Opinion, 28 HOFSTRA L. REV. 741, 753-55 (2000)
27. http://www.sentencingproject.org/detail/publication.cfm?publication-id= 146.
28. Erik Luna, Criminal Justice and the Public Imagination, 7 OHIO ST. J. CRIM. L. 71, 81-83 (2009)
29. Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 443 (2000)
30. Carol S. Steiker, Counter-Revolution in Constitutional Criminal Procedure? Two Audiences, Two Answers, 94 MICH. L. REV. 2466, 2470-71 (1996).
31. Erik Luna, The Overcriminalization Phenomenon, 54 AM. U. L. REV. 703, 719-29 (2005)
32. Sara Sun Beale, Still Tough on Crime?: Prospects for Restorative Justice in the United States, 2003 UTAH L. REV. 413, 425-28
33. Sara Sun Beale, What's Law Got to Do with It?: The Political, Social, Psychological and Other Non-Legal Factors Influencing the Development of (Federal) Criminal Law, 1 BUFF. CRIM. L. REV. 23, 44-51 (1997).
34. Jonathan Simon, Governing Through Crime: How The War On Crime Transformed American Democracy And Created A Culture Of Fear (2007).
35. Michael Tonry, Thinking About Crime: Sense And Sen-Sibility In American Penal Culture 195-227 (2004)
36. Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins and Sam Kamin, Punishment And Democracy: Three Strikes And You'Re Out In California 181-215 (2001)
37. Philip Pettit, Depo-liticizing Democracy, 17 RATIO JURIS 52, 58-63 (2004).
38. Cheryl Marie Webster and Anthony N. Doob, Punitive Trends and Sta-ble Imprisonment Rates in Canada, 36 CRIME and JUST. 297, 341-42 (2007).
39. Stephanos Bibas, The Machinery Of Criminal Justice 43-48 (2012)
40. Kate Stith and José A. Cabranes, Fear Of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines In The Federal Courts 104-42 (1998)
41. Erik Luna, Gridland: An Allegorical Critique of Federal Sentencing, 96 J. CRIM. L. and CRIMINOLOGY 25, 35-48 (2005)
42. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 427 (1989)
43. Yuval Eylon and Alon Harel, The Right to Judicial Review, 92 VA. L. REV. 991, 994 (2006)
44. Susan Gordon, Montesquieu: The French Philosopher Who Shaped Modern Government 86-87 (2006)
45. Gregory R. Johnson, The First Founding Father: Aristotle on Freedom and Popular Government, in LIBERTY AND DEMOCRACY 29, 49 (Tibor R. Machan ed., 2002)
46. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/bureaucracy
47. Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas Of The Individual In Public Services 3 (Rev. Ed. 2010).
48. Lawrence M. Friedman, Crime And Punishment In American History 29, 251, 391 (1993).
49. Max Weber, The Methodology Of The Social Sciences 90 (Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch Eds. and Trans., 4Th Ed. 1968)
50. Max Weber, The Theory Of Social And Economic Organiza-Tion 329-41
51. James P. Pfiffner, Political Appointees and Career Executives: The Democracy-Bureaucracy Nexus in the Third Century, 47 PUB. ADMIN. REV. 57, 57-58 (1987)
52. V.A. Leonard and Harry W. More, Police Organization And Man-Agement 5 (9Th Ed. 2000).
53. McElroy v. United States, 455 U.S. 642, 673 (1982)
54. H.L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398, 454 (1981)
55. Herbert L. Packer, Two Models of the Criminal Process, 113 U. PA. L. REV. 1 (1964)
56. Mirjan Damas?ka, Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study, 121 U. PA. L. REV. 506, 574-77 (1973)
57. John Griffiths, Ideology in Criminal Procedure, or a Third Model of the Criminal Process, 79 YALE L.J. 359 (1970)
58. Herbert L. Packer, The Courts, the Police, and the Rest of Us, 57 J. CRIM. L., CRIMINOLOGY and POLICE SCI. 238, 239 (1966)
59. Erik Luna and Marianne Wade, Prosecutors As Judges, 67 Wash. and Lee L. Rev. 1413, 1481-86 (2010)
60. Lindsey Devers, Bureau Of Just. Assistance, Plea And Charge Bargaining: Research Summary 3 (2011), Available At Https://Www.Bja.Gov/Publications/ Pleabargainingresearchsummary.Pdf
61. J.P. Mayer, Max Weber And German Politics 125-31 (2D Ed. 1944).
62. Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism 181-82
63. Ralph P. Hummel, The Bureaucratic Experience: The Post-Modern Challenge 165-68 (5Th Ed. 2008)
64. Robert L. Sanders, The Future of Bureaucracy, 31 REC. MGMT. Q. 44 (1997)
65. Claudia Buck, Maligned, Tedious, but Essential, SACRAMENTO BEE, Sept. 1, 1985, at A1
66. Charles T. Goodsell, The Case For Bureaucracy: A Public Administra-Tion Polemic (4Th Ed. 2003)
67. H. Brinton Milward and Hal G. Rainey, Don't Blame the Bureaucracy!, 3 J. PUB. POL'Y 149 (1983)
68. Irvin Molotsky, Bureaucracy Just Another Machine Stalled in Snow at Nation's Capital, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 23, 1987, at B2
69. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bureaucratese
70. http://www2.owen.vanderbilt.edu/lukefroeb/files/Bureaucratese-tlk.doc
71. Alex Kozinski, The Wrong Stuff, 1992 BYU L. REV. 325, 328
72. People v. Mai, 22 Cal. App. 4th 117, 126 (1994)
73. Arredondo v. Ortiz, 365 F.3d 778, 787
74. Erik Luna, System Failure, 42 AM. CRIM. L. REV. 1201, 1212 n.36 (2005)
75. Pierre J. Schlag, Normativity and the Politics of Form, 139 U. PA. L. REV. 801, 881 (1991).
76. Lewis A. Coser, Masters Of Sociological Thought: Ideas In His-Torical And Social Context 231 (1971)
77. Chris R. Braiden, Enriching Traditional Roles, in POLICE MANAGE-MENT: ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES 87, 96 (Larry T. Hoover ed., 1992).
78. Jenia Iontcheva, Jury Sentencing as Democratic Practice, 89 VA. L. REV. 311, 339 (2003)
79. Debra Livingston, Gang Loitering, the Court, and Some Realism About Police Patrol, 1999 SUP. CT. REV. 141, 193.
80. Louis L. Jaffe, Book Review, 14 VILL. L. REV. 773, 777 (1969)
81. John Schwartz, Open-Access Advocate Is Arrested for Huge Download, N.Y. TIMES, July 20, 2011, at A17
82. Michael Daly, Aaron Swartz's Unbending Prosecutors Insisted on Pris-on Time, DAILY BEAST (Jan. 15, 2012, 4:45 AM), http://www.thedailybeast.com/ articles/2013/01/15/aaron-swartz-s-unbending-prosecutors-insisted-on-prison- time.html
83. Noam Cohen, A Data Crusader, a Defendant and Now, a Cause, N.Y. TIMES, Jan. 14, 2013, at A1
84. http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/murder-by-prosecutor/Content?oid=2803044
85. James Boyle, The Prosecution of Aaron Swartz: A Reply to Orin Kerr, HUFFINGTON POST (Jan. 18, 2013, 10:11 PM), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james- boyle/prosecution-aaron-swartz-b-2508242.html.
86. http://www.volokh.com/2013/01/16/the-criminal-charges-against-aaron- swartz-part-2-prosecutorial-discretion.
87. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/fire-assistant-us-attorney- steve-heymann/RJKSY2nb
88. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/remove-united-states-district- attorney-carmen-ortiz-office-overreach-case-aaron-swartz/RQNrG1Ck