The role of margin status and reexcision in local recurrence following breast conservation surgery

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 2250-2255

  Adams, Barbara J ^a   Zoon, Christine K ^a   Stevenson, Christina ^b   Chitnavis, Padma ^c   Wolfe, Luke ^a   Bear, Harry D ^a,d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CONSERVATION SURGERY; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; EXCISION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LOCAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECURRENT CANCER; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECEPTOR, ERBB-2; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84878869196     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2831-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233-41. (Pubitemid 35176242)
2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227-32. (Pubitemid 35176241)
3. Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, Meric F, et al. Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(3):256-65. (Pubitemid 34298630)
4. Gage I, Schnitt SJ, Nixon AJ, et al. Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 1996;78(9):1921-8. (Pubitemid 26360575)
5. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1668-75. (Pubitemid 30220545)
6. Vicini FA, Kestin L, Huang R, Martinez A. Does local recurrence affect the rate of distant metastases and survival in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy? Cancer. 2003;97(4):910-9. (Pubitemid 36173142)
7. Heil J, Breitkreuz K, Golatta M, et al. Do reexcisions impair aesthetic outcome in breast conservation surgery? Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):541-7.
8. Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(4):979-85. (Pubitemid 37324115)
9. Kouzminova NB, Aggarwal S, Aggarwal A, Allo MD, Lin AY. Impact of initial surgical margins and residual cancer upon reexcision on outcome of patients with localized breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):771-80.
10. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(3):333-9. (Pubitemid 43255916)
11. Swanson GP, Rynearson K, Symmonds R. Significance of margins of excision on breast cancer recurrence. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25(5):438-41. (Pubitemid 35154944)
12. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184(5):383-93. (Pubitemid 35335942)
13. Jones HA, Antonini N, Hart AA, et al. Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):4939-47.
14. Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical margins on local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3219-32.
15. Wang SY, Chu H, Shamliyan T, et al. Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(7):507-16.
16. Meric F, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, et al. Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy. Cancer. 2003;97(4):926-33. (Pubitemid 36173144)
17. Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, et al., Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(2):99 - 03.