Comparison of process configurations for ethanol production from acid- and alkali-pretreated corncob by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with and without β-glucosidase expression

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 142, Issue , 2013, Pages 154-161

  Wang, Guoqiang ^a   Liu, Cheng ^a   Hong, Jiefang ^a   Ma, Yuanyuan ^a   Zhang, Kun ^a   Huang, Xinyu ^a   Zou, Shaolan ^a   Zhang, Minhua ^a  

^a TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cellulosic ethanol; Process configuration; Recombinant yeast; Synergy; Glucosidase

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; OPTIMIZATION; UREA; YEAST;

GLUCOSIDASE; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; RECOMBINANT YEAST; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SEPARATE HYDROLYSIS AND FERMENTATION; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; SYNERGISTIC EFFECT; SYNERGY;

LOADING;

ALCOHOL; BETA GLUCOSIDASE; UREA;

BIOMASS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; OIL PRODUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; RECOMBINATION; YEAST;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNCOB; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; MAIZE; NONHUMAN; PLANT STRUCTURES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHARIFICATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84878856095     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.033     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ask M., Olofsson K., Felice T.D., Ruohonen L., Penttilä M., Lidén G., Olsson L. Challenges in enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated Arundo donax revealed by a comparison between SHF and SSF. Process Biochem. 2012, 47:1452-1459.
2. Banerjee G., Scott-Craig J.S., Walton J.D. Improving enzymes for biomass conversion: a basic research perspective. Bioenergy Res. 2010, 3:82-92.
3. Cantarella M., Cantarella L., Gallifuoco A., Spera A., Alfani F. Comparision of different detoxification methods for steam-exploded poplar wood as a substrate for the bioproduction of ethanol in SHF and SSF. Process Biochem. 2004, 39:1533-1542.
4. Den Haan R., Rose S.H., Lynd L.R., Van Zyl W.H. Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2007, 9:87-94.
5. Gao D., Chundawat S.P.S., Krishnan C., Balan V., Dale B.E. Mixture optimization of six core glycosyl hydrolases for maximizing saccharification of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreated corn stover. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2770-2781.
6. Ghose T.K. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 1987, 59:257-268.
7. Gietz R.D., Schiestl R.H., Willems A.R., Woods R.A. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 1995, 11(4):355-360.
8. Golias H., Dumsday G.J., Stanley G.A., Pamment N.B. Characteristics of cellulase preparations affecting the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to ethanol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2000, 22:617-621.
9. Huang R.L., Su R.X., Qi W., He Z.M. Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research. Bioenergy Res. 2011, 4:225-245.
10. Khramtsov N., McDade L., Amerik A., Yu E., Divatia K., Tikhonov A., Minto M., Kabongo-Mubalamate G., Markovic Z., Ruiz-Martinez M., Henck S. Industrial yeast strain engineered to ferment ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:8310-8313.
11. Lynd L.R., Van Zyl W.H., McBride J.E., Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16:577-583.
12. Manzanares P., Negro M.J., Oliva J.M., Saéz F., Ballesteros I., Ballesteros M., Cara C., Castro E., Ruiz E. Different process configurations for bioethanol production from pretreated olive pruning biomass. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011, 86:881-887.
13. Matano Y., Hasunuma T., Kondo A. Display of cellulases on the cell surface of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for high yield ethanol production from high-solid lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 108:128-133.
14. Olofsson K., Bertilsson M., Lidén G. A short review on SSF - an interesting process option for ethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2008, 1:7.
15. Olson D.G., McBride J.E., Shaw A.J., Lynd L.R. Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23:396-405.
16. Pallapolu R.V., Lee Y.Y., Garlock R.J., Balan V., Dale B.E., Kim Y., Mosier N.S., Ladisch M.R., Falls M., Holtzapple M.T., Sierra-Ramirez R., Shi J., Ebrik M.A., Redmond T., Yang B., Wyman C.E., Donohoe B.S., Vinzant T.B., Elander R.T., Hames B., Thomas S., Warner R.E. Effects of enzyme loading and β-glucosidase supplementation on enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass processed by leading pretreatment technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11115-11120.
17. Sakai A., Shimizu Y., Hishinuma F. Integration of heterologous genes into the chromosome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a delta sequence of yeast retrotransposon Ty. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1990, 33:302-306.
18. Sambrook J., Russell D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2001, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
19. Shen J.C., Agblevor F.A. The operable modeling of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of ethanol production from cellulose. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160:665-681.
20. Shen Y., Zhang Y., Ma T., Bao X., Du F., Zhuang G., Qu Y. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of acid-pretreated corncobs with a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing beta-glucosidase. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:5099-5103.
21. Singhania R.R., Patel A.K., Sukumaran R.K., Larroche C., Pandey A. Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127:500-507.
22. Souza C.J.A., Costa D.A., Rodrigues M.Q.R.B., Santos A.F., Lopes M.R., Abrantes A.B.P., Costa P.S., Silveira W.B., Passos F.M.L., Fietto L.G. The influence of presaccharification, fermentation temperature and yeast strain on ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 109:63-69.
23. Tolan J.S. Iogen's demonstration process for producing ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Biorefineries-Industrial Processes and Products: Status Quo and Future Directions 2008, 193-208. Wiley, Germany. B. Kamm, P.R. Gruber, M. Kamm (Eds.).
24. Van Dyk J.S., Pletschke B.I. A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes-factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30:1458-1480.
25. Van Zyl W.H., Lynd L.R., Den Haan R., McBride J.E. Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2007, 108:205-235.
26. Viikari L., Vehmaanpera J., Koivula A. Lignocellulosic ethanol: from science to industry. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 46:13-24.
27. Wingren A., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19:1109-1117.
28. Wyman C.E., Balan V., Dale B.E., Elander R.T., Falls M., Hames B., Holtzapple M.T., Ladisch M.R., Lee Y.Y., Mosier N., Pallapolu V.R., Shi J., Thomas S.R., Warner R.E. Comparative data on effects of leading pretreatments and enzyme loadings and formulations on sugar yields from different switchgrass sources. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11052-11062.
29. Xu Q., Singh A., Himmel M.E. Perspectives and new directions for the production of bioethanol using consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:364-371.
30. Zacchi G., Axelsson A. Economic evaluation of preconcentration in production of ethanol from dilute sugar solutions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 34:223-233.
31. Zhang W.N., Liu C., Wang G.Q., Ma Y.Y., Zhang K., Zou S.L., Zhang M.H. Comparison of the expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae of endoglucanases II from Trichoderma reesei and endoglucanase I from Aspergillus aculeatus. BioResources 2012, 7(3):4031-4045.
32. Zheng Y., Pan Z.L., Zhang R. Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2009, 2:51-68.