Fabrication of a multi-layer three-dimensional scaffold with controlled porous micro-architecture for application in small intestine tissue engineering

Cell Adhesion and Migration

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 267-274

  Knight, Toyin ^a   Basu, Joydeep ^a   Rivera, Elias A ^a   Spencer, Thomas ^a   Jain, Deepak ^a   Payne, Richard ^a  

^a Tengion Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Multi layer scaffold; Pore size; Porosity; Small intestine; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPITHELIUM CELL; EPITHELIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; SMALL INTESTINE; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE STRUCTURE;

RODENTIA;

EID: 84878810696     PISSN: 19336918     EISSN: 19336926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cam.24351     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Basu J, Ludlow JW. Platform technologies for tubular organ regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 2010; 28:526-33; PMID:20800302; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. tibtech.2010.07.007.
2. Basu J, Genheimer CW, Guthrie KI, Sangha N, Quinlan SF, Bruce AT, et al. Expansion of the human adipose-derived stromal vascular cell fraction yields a population of smooth muscle-like cells with markedly distinct phenotypic and functional properties relative to mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011; 17:843-60; PMID:21595545; http://dx.doi. org/10.1089/ten.tec.2010. 0697.
3. Jayo MJ, Jain D, Ludlow JW, Payne R, Wagner BJ, McLorie G, et al. Long-term durability, tissue regeneration and neo-organ growth during skeletal maturation with a neo-bladder augmentation construct. Regen Med 2008; 3:671-82; PMID:18729792; http://dx.doi. org/10.2217/17460751.3.5.671.
4. Joseph D, Borer J, De Filippo R, McLorie G, Goldberg L, Tillinger M, et al. A Phase 2 study - Autologous Neo-Bladder Construct (NBC) for augmentation cystoplasty in subjects with neurogenic bladder secondary to spina bifida. Abstract presented at the American Urology Association meeting, Chicago, IL, April 25-30, 2009.
5. Gupta A, Dixit A, Sales KM, Winslet MC, Seifalian AM. Tissue engineering of small intestine - current status. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7:2701-9; PMID:17025341; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ bm060383e.
6. Basu J, Mihalko KL, Payne R, Rivera E, Knight T, Genheimer CW, et al. Regeneration of rodent small intestine tissue following implantation of scaffolds seeded with a novel source of smooth muscle cells. Regen Med 2011; 6:721-31; PMID:22050524; http:// dx.doi.org/10.2217/rme.11.78.
7. Gupta A, Vara DS, Punshon G, Sales KM, Winslet MC, Seifalian AM. In vitro small intestinal epithelial cell growth on a nanocomposite polycaprolactone scaffold. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2009; 54:221-9; PMID:19860739; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ BA20090214.
8. Kaihara S, Kim S, Benvenuto M, Kim BS, Mooney DJ, Tanaka K, et al. End-to-end anastomosis between tissue-engineered intestine and native small bowel. Tissue Eng 1999; 5:339-46; PMID:10477856; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten. 1999.5.339.
9. Bianchi A. Longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring: results in 20 children. J R Soc Med 1997; 90:429-32; PMID:9306995.
10. Krupnick AS, Morris JB. The long-term results of resection and multiple resections in Crohn's disease. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000; 11:41-51; PMID:10706228.
11. Smith IO, Liu XH, Smith LA, Ma PX. Nanostructured polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2009; 1:226-36; PMID:20049793; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wnan.26.
12. Wei G, Ma PX. Nanostructured biomaterials for regeneration. Adv Funct Mater 2008; 18:3566- 82; PMID:19946357; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ adfm.200800662.
13. Pamula E, Filová E, Bacáková L, Lisá V, Adamczyk D. Resorbable polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: the influence of their microstructure on the growth of human osteoblast-like MG 63 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 89:432-43; PMID:18431773; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31977.
14. Lee JB, Jeong SI, Bae MS, Yang DH, Heo DN, Kim CH, et al. Highly porous electrospun nanofibers enhanced by ultrasonication for improved cellular infiltration. Tissue Eng Part A 2011; 17:2695-702; PMID:21682540; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten. tea.2010.0709.
15. Luo Y, Engelmayr G, Auguste DT, da Silva Ferreira L, Karp JM, Saigal R, et al. Three dimensional scaffolds. In: Lanza R, Vacanti JP eds. Principles of Tissue Engineering. 3rd Ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007: 367.
16. Tan Q, Li S, Ren J, Chen C. Fabrication of porous scaffolds with a controllable microstructure and mechanical properties by porogen fusion technique. Int J Mol Sci 2011; 12:890-904; PMID:21541032; http://dx.doi.org/10. 3390/ijms12020890.
17. Chen DC, Avansino JR, Agopian VG, Hoagland VD, Woolman JD, Pan S, et al. Comparison of polyester scaffolds for bioengineered intestinal mucosa. Cells Tissues Organs 2006; 184:154-65; PMID:17409741; http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/ 000099622.
18. Khoda AK, Ozbolat IT, Koc B. Engineered tissue scaffolds with variational porous architecture. J Biomech Eng 2011; 133:011001; PMID:21186891; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4002933.
19. Hidalgo-Bastida LA, Barry JJA, Everitt NM, Rose FRAJ, Buttery LD, Hall IP, et al. Cell adhesion and mechanical properties of a flexible scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 2007; 3:457-62; PMID:17321810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.006.
20. He L, Liu B, Xipeng G, Xie G, Liao S, Quan D, et al. Microstructure and properties of nano-fibrous PCL-b-PLLA scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 2009; 18:63-74; PMID:19859871.
21. Pamula E, Bacakova L, Filova E, Buczynska J, Dobrzynski P, Noskova L, et al. The influence of pore size on colonization of poly(L-lactide-glycolide) scaffolds with human osteoblast-like MG 63 cells in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008; 19:425-35; PMID:17607515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3001-1.
22. Vaquette C, Cooper-White JJ. Increasing electrospun scaffold pore size with tailored collectors for improved cell penetration. Acta Biomater 2011; 7:2544-57; PMID:21371575; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio. 2011.02.036.
23. Caliari SR, Harley BA. The effect of anisotropic collagen-GAG scaffolds and growth factor supplementation on tendon cell recruitment, alignment, and metabolic activity. Biomaterials 2011; 32:5330-40; PMID:21550653; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2011.04.021.
24. Chiu YC, Cheng MH, Engel H, Kao SW, Larson JC, Gupta S, et al. The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011; 32:6045-51; PMID:21663958.
25. Murphy CM, O'Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr 2010; 4:377-81; PMID:20421733; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ cam.4.3.11747.
26. Mayhew TM. Adaptive remodelling of intestinal epithelium assessed using stereology: correlation of single cell and whole organ data with nutrient transport. Histol Histopathol 1996; 11:729-41; PMID:8839763.
27. Martini F, Ober WC, Garrison CW, Welch K, Hutchings RT, Caceci T. Fundamentals of Anatomy & Physiology, fifth edition. Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 2001.
28. Friedl P, Zänker KS, Bröcker EB. Cell migration strategies in 3-D extracellular matrix: differences in morphology, cell matrix interactions, and integrin function. Microsc Res Tech 1998; 43:369-78; PMID:9858334; http: / / dx .doi.org /10.1002/ (SICI) 1097 -0029(19981201)43:5<369::AID-JEMT3>3.0. CO;2-6.
29. Zahm JM, Kaplan H, Hérard AL, Doriot F, Pierrot D, Somelette P, et al. Cell migration and proliferation during the in vitro wound repair of the respiratory epithelium. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1997; 37:33-43; PMID:9142437; http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1997)37:1<33::AIDCM4> 3.0.CO;2-I.
30. Bianco G, Fontanella B, Severino L, Quaroni A, Autore G, Marzocco S. Nivalenol and deoxynivalenol affect rat intestinal epithelial cells: a concentration related study. PLoS One 2012; 7:e52051; PMID:23251682; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052051.
31. Rocnik EF, Chan BM, Pickering JG. Evidence for a role of collagen synthesis in arterial smooth muscle cell migration. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:1889-98; PMID:9576753; http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI1025.
32. O'Neil CH, Boffa MB, Hancock MA, Pickering JG, Koschinsky ML. Stimulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration by apolipoprotein(a) is dependent on inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta activation and on the presence of kringle IV type 9. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:55187-95; PMID:15498766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M409860200.
33. Ghibaudo M, Trichet L, Le Digabel J, Richert A, Hersen P, Ladoux B. Substrate topography induces a crossover from 2D to 3D behavior in fibroblast migration. Biophys J 2009; 97:357-68; PMID:19580774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpj.2009.04.024.
34. Peyton SR, Kalcioglu ZI, Cohen JC, Runkle AP, Van Vliet KJ, Lauffenburger DA, et al. Marrow-derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108:1181-93; PMID:21449030; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23027.
35. Mills RJ, Frith JE, Hudson JE, Cooper-White JJ. Effect of geometric challenges on cell migration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2011; 17:999-1010; PMID:21631399; http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0138.
36. Guarino V, Causa F, Ambrosio L. Porosity and mechanical properties relationship in PCL porous scaffolds. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2007; 5:149-57; PMID:20799184.
37. Rajagopalan S, Robb R. Image-based metrology of porous tissue engineering scaffolds. Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging. 2006; 6144.
38. Shackelford C, Long G, Wolf J, Okerberg C, Herbert R. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of nonneoplastic lesions in toxicology studies. Toxicol Pathol 2002; 30:93-6; PMID:11890482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 01926230252824761.