Non linear push over assessment of heritage buildings in Istanbul to define seismic risk

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 285-306

  D'Ayala, D ^a   Ansal, A ^b  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^b BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Heritage buildings; Masonry; Performance point; Pushover analysis; Seismic vunerability; Site amplification; Site response analysis

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; SEISMIC DESIGN;

HERITAGE BUILDINGS; MASONRY; PERFORMANCE POINTS; PUSH-OVER ANALYSIS; SITE AMPLIFICATION; SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS; VUNERABILITY;

EARTHQUAKES;

CULTURAL HERITAGE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; HISTORIC BUILDING; NONLINEARITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VULNERABILITY;

ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84878805716     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-011-9311-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ansal A, Tönük G (2007) Source and site effects for microzonation. In: Pitilakis K (ed) Earthquake geotechnical engineering, 4th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering-invited lectures, Chap. 4. Springer, pp 73-92
2. Ansal A, Durukal E, Tönük G (2006) Selection and scaling of real acceleration time histories for site response analyses. In: Proceedings of ETC12 Workshop, Athens
3. Ansal A, Tönük G, Demircioglu M, Bayrakli Y, Sesetyan K, Erdik M (2006) Ground motion parameters for vulnerability assessment. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Paper Number: 1790
4. Ansal A, D'Ayala D, Kurtuluş A, Tönük G (2010) Site specific ground motion estimations for the vulnerability assessment of historic buildings in Istanbul. In: Joint conference proceedings, 7th international conference on urban earthquake engineering (7CUEE) & 5th international conference on earthquake engineering (5ICEE) March 3-5, 2010, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo
5. ASCE 41-06 (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, 1st edn. American Society of Civil Engineers, 423 p, ISBN: 9780784408841
6. Bernardini A (1999) Qualitative and quantitative measures in seismic damage assessment and forecasting of masonry buildings. In: Bernardini A (ed) Seismic damage to masonry buildings. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 169-179
7. Bernardini A, Lagomarsino S (2008) The seismic vulnerability of architectural heritage. Proc ICE Struct Build 161(4):171-181
8. Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site dependent response spectra for design (Methodology and Justification). Earthq Spectr 10(4):617-654
9. Carpinteri A, Invernizzi S, Lacidogna G (2005) In situ damage assessment and nonlinear modelling of a historical masonry tower. Eng Struct 27(3):387-395
10. Coburn A, Spence R (2002) Earthquake protection. 2. Wiley, London
11. D'Ayala D (2004) Correlation of fragility curves for vernacular building types: houses in Lalitpur, Nepal and in Istanbul, Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference of earthquake engineering, Vancouver
12. D'Ayala DF (2005) Force and displacement based vulnerability assessment for traditional buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 3(3):235-265
13. D'Ayala DF (2008) Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of cultural heritage buildings in Istanbul, Turkey. In: 14th WCEE, Beijing
14. D'Ayala DF, Casapulla C (2001) Limit state analysis of hemispherical domes with finite friction. In: Historical constructions, possibilities of numerical and experimental techniques, pp 617-626
15. D'Ayala DF, Shi Y (2011) On modeling masonry historic buildings by multi-body Dynamics. Int J Archit Heritage 5(4):1-35
16. D'Ayala D, Speranza E (2003) Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spectr 19:479-509
17. D'Ayala DF, Tomasoni E (2011) Three-dimensional analysis of masonry vaults using limit state analysis with finite friction. Int J Archit Heritage 5(2):140-171
18. D'Ayala D, Spence R, Oliveira C, Pomonis A (1997) Earthquake loss estimation for Europe's historic town centres. Earthq Spectr 13(4):773-793
19. Directive of the PCM 12 October 2007 (2007) Evaluation and reduction of seismic risk of cultural heritage with reference to the technical standard for construction (in Italian) G.U.R.I. n. 24, 9 January 2008
20. Erdik M, Fahjan Y (2006) Damage scenarios and damage evaluation, assessing and managing earthquake risk geo-scientific and engineering Knowledge for earthquake risk mitigation: developments, tools, techniques. In: Oliveira CS, Roca A, Goula X (eds) Book series: geotechnical, geological, and earthquake engineering, vol 2, Ch. 10
21. Erdik M, Durukal E, Şeşetyan K, Demircioǧlu MB (2007) Assessment of site-specific earthquake Hazard at reference ground conditions, Istanbul seismic risk mitigation and emergency preparedness project (ISMEP). Consultancy Services for inventorization and multi-hazard and earthquake performance evaluation of the cultural heritage buildings in Istanbul under the responsibility of theministry of culture and tourism Eurocode 8, 2002004, BS EN 1998-3:2004, Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings. British Standard Institution, London
22. Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectr 16(3): 573-592
23. Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15, Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg, p 99
24. Heyman J (1977) Equilibrium of shell structures. Clarendon Press, Oxford
25. Idriss IM, Sun JI (1992) Shake91, a computer program for conducting equivalent linear seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits modified based on the original SHAKE program published in December 1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed
26. ISCARSAH (2003) ICOMOS charter: principles for the analysis, conservation and structural restoration of architectural heritage. ICOMOS, Available at the website. http://www.international.icomos.org/charters.htm. (Accessed July 2010)
27. Lagomarsino S, Podesta S (2004) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. Statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthq Spectr 20:395. doi:10.1193/1.1737736
28. Lang K, Bachmann H (2004) On the seismic vulnerability of existing buildings-a case study to the city of Basel. Earthq Spectr 20
29. Meli R, Sanchez-Ramirez R (1996) Considerations on the seismic safety of historical monuments. In: Proceedings of 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, 11 WCEE, Acapulco, June 1996. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Paper No. 2087 (CD)
30. TEC (2007) Turkish code. Ministry of public works and settlement. Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Government of Republic of Turkey
31. Tomaževic M (2007) Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience. Can J Civ Eng 34:1403-1412
32. Zhou Z, Walker P, D'Ayala D (2008) Strength characteristics of hydraulic lime mortared brickwork. Proc Inst Civ Eng Constr Mater 161(4):139-146