Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1403-1412

  Tomaževič, Miha ^a  

^a SLOVENIAN NATIONAL BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Behavior factor; Damage; Limit states; Masonry structures; Seismic performance; Seismic resistant design

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION THEORY; DAMAGE DETECTION; MASONRY CONSTRUCTION; STANDARDS; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

BEHAVIOR FACTOR; MASONRY STRUCTURES; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; SEISMIC-RESISTANT DESIGN;

EARTHQUAKES;

CORRELATION THEORY; DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKES; MASONRY CONSTRUCTION; STANDARDS; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; LOADING; MASONRY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SHAKING TABLE TEST;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SLOVENIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 40449087339     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/L07-128     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alcocer, S.M., Arias, J.G., and Flores, L.E. 2004. Some developments on performance-based seismic design of masonry structures. In Performance-Based Seismic Design. Concepts and Implementation. Edited by P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler. PEER, Berkeley, Calif, pp. 233-244.
2. Bosiljkov, V., and Tomaževič, M. 2006. Optimization of shape of masonry units and technology of construction for earthquake resistant masonry buildings, Parts 2 and 3. Report. ZAG (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Ljubljana, Slovenia.
3. Calvi, G.M. 1999. A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3: 411-438. doi:10.1142/S136324699900017X.
4. CEN. 2004. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Eurocode 8: EN 1998-1. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN), Brussels.
5. D'Ayala, D. 1998. Correlation of seismic vulnerability and damage between classes of buildings: churches and houses. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Measures of Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. pp. 41-58.
6. Grünthal, G. (Editor). 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. In Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie. Vol. 15. European Seismological Commission, Luxemburg, Brussels.
7. Magenes, G. 2006. Masonry building design in seismic areas: recent experiences and prospects from a European standpoint. In The First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 3-8 September 2006. [CD-ROM], Keynote Address K9. Available from www.ecees.org/Paper/paper4009.pdf [accessed 10 December 2007].
8. Tomaževič, M., and Klemenc, I. 1997. Seismic behavior of confined masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26: 1059-1071.
9. Tomaževič, M., and Žarnić, R. 1984. The effect of horizontal reinforcement on strength and ductility of masonry walls, Part one. Report ZRMK/IKPI-84/02. ZAG (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Ljubljana, Slovenia.
10. Tomaževič, M., Lutman, M., and Weiss, P. 1993. The seismic resistance of historical urban buildings and the interventions in their floor systems: an experimental study. The Masonry Society Journal, 12(1): 77-86.
11. Tomaževič, M., Bosiljkov, V., Weiss, P., and Klemenc, I. 2004. Experimental research for identification, of structural behaviour factor for masonry buildings, Part 1. Report. ZAG (Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute), Ljubljana, Slovenia.